Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FedEx CEO Calls For End To Oil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 11:10 AM
Original message
FedEx CEO Calls For End To Oil
http://thinkprogress.org/2011/02/03/fred-smith-end-oil/

FedEx CEO Calls For End To Oil

In his State of the Union address, President Barack Obama called for the nation to rapidly deploy electric cars and trucks to get the United States off oil dependence. The president has now been joined by one of America’s top Republican businessmen, FedEx CEO Frederick W. Smith. In a Fortune column, Smith described how the “670 aircraft and 70,000 motorized vehicles” of his company deliver 7 million packages a day — “nearly every single one of which is fueled by oil.” This dependence “comes at a significant cost,” Smith said, putting the U.S. military at risk and “requiring us to accommodate governments that share neither our values nor our goals.” Oil spikes bring about recessions, and “petroleum was responsible for 43% of U.S. energy-related CO2 emissions in 2009,” Smith, a huge financial supporter of George W. Bush and Sen. John McCain, explained. However, Smith agreed with the president that America can power away from petroleum:

We cannot continue down this path. There is, however, a solution that may become economically attractive sooner than most think: cars and trucks powered by electricity. Electricity is generated by a diverse, domestic, stable, fundamentally scalable portfolio of fuels that is almost entirely free of oil.

A member of the Electrification Coalition, Smith called on Congress to enact the bipartisan Electric Vehicle Deployment Act which stalled last year in the Senate. “I am not someone who tends to advocate increased government involvement in the private sector,” Smith concluded. “But there is no free market for oil. This is not a market issue — it is a national security issue.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Electric jets?
Got to see that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. All electric jet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. And Opec is price controls anyways.
Although it can have a benefit of raising prices to get people off of oil, almosty nobody figured that out in the 1970s because so many people were making money off of oil.

We could all be driving the 2000 'flying' cars of cheap distributed energy right now, if people would have listened to what was obvious back then.


Side note back then I didn't push much for that, I thought the leaders in many sectors were actually taking care of things for most people, my bad there.


The amount of 'electricity' needed to run cars and trains and the ability to produce that with wind, solar, and other inventions, is an interesting question.

But if windmills can create fuel for hydrogen fuel cells or similar tech, then anyone that buys a windmill could open a gas station. It has the added benefit of diversifying energy control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. We are gonna need to massively increase our mass transit if we want to do this,
and not cut and cut and cut like we have been doing the past few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RollWithIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Not a big fan of his, mostly his anti-union stance, but glad he's gettin on board...
So thanks buddy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. We've Known This Since The 1970s
and our dependency on oil has only gotten worse. In fact, there's been less and less mass transit projects since the 1970s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarsInHerHair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. I like the solar "trees" in parking lots/recharging stations...
http://www.jetsongreen.com/ I first saw them here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC