Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

After Running Against Govt. Spending, GA Republicans Whine About Not Getting $105 Million Port Grant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 06:27 PM
Original message
After Running Against Govt. Spending, GA Republicans Whine About Not Getting $105 Million Port Grant

After Running Against Govt. Spending, GA Republicans Whine About Not Getting $105 Million Port Grant

During last year’s election season, some of the most vitriolic anti-government rhetoric came from GOP officials in the state of Georgia. Across the state, Republican lawmakers ranging from members of Congress all the way up to gubenatorial candidate Nathan Deal demonized the government and praised the free market as the solution to all of the state’s problems:

<...>

- Then-gubenatorial candidate Nathan Deal: Deal’s stand against government spending was so extreme that one his spokesmen even compared federal dollars to illicit drugs: “The thing with this federal money is it’s like a drug dealer: the first one’s free and then they’ve got you hooked and you play by their rules.” (8/3/10)

Yet all these Republicans are now singing a different tune related to a local government project they have been advocating for. For years, the port city of Savannah, Georgia, has sought federal funds in order to expand and deepen the Savannah Port, which would allow for more extensive operations and commerce in the major southeastern port. The Georgia congressional delegation as well as Gov. Nathan Deal had requested $105 million in order to make these expansions in the recent Obama budget. Yet the budget contained only $600,000 for the project, falling well short of the request. Now, these same Republicans are complaining about not getting enough federal spending that they all campaigned against this past election season:

<...>

- Gov. Nathan Deal: Deal, apparently no longer willing to compare the federal government to a drug dealer, said the state “obviously hoped for a much greater show of support from the president.” The governor even went as far as to say that the Constitution mandate that it’s the federal government’s “responsibility” to pay for ports. (2/15/11, 2/14/11)

Kingston, responding to a tweet asking about the port project from the Georgia Young Democrats on CSPAN, lavished praise on the port project, saying that “infrastructure spending can create jobs.” “There’s a big case out there for infrastructure spending,” Kingston concluded. Watch it:

more




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's pork if it's in someone else's district, and infrastructure
if it's in yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Let 'em choke on their own whine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddwv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Port whine...
Lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. ...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Friendly reminder: There are millions of Dems here in GA. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. K and R (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philkd Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Similar situation in Charleston SC with Graham threatening an earmark
Edited on Wed Feb-16-11 11:22 PM by philkd
A $400,000 dredging study for the port wasn`t included in the pres budget after all but wilson and demint signed a letter requesting the funds. This is "you lie" wilson`s district ironicaly. Clyburn`s been roasting Graham for apparently fillibustering the funds 3 times last year and now wanting to use earmarks. Clyburn says he will stand with the Pres and oppose all earmarks ;) Graham`s using Savannah as an example of not recieving federal funds putting charleston`s port at a competative disadvantage.

By not including these funds in the budget this may be a good strategy for bargaining by the WH. Graham is an excellent litigater and very good at playing the game so this is definatly a story to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC