Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How many of you remember when the interest on your car loan was deductible?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:32 PM
Original message
How many of you remember when the interest on your car loan was deductible?
I remember the last years of the Carter Administration. I bought a house in Mill Valley, California. Within a month of buying it, I was offered $100,000.00 more than I paid for it. I sat down with my accountant, who was also a good friend and someone I grew up next door to. He told me that the short term capital gains rate at that time was 90%. Thus, if I sold the house immediately, my net profit would have been $10,000.00 after taxes.

That year, we did my taxes. I was allowed to deduct the interest on EVERY loan I had. My car loans, my credit cards, everything. If you leased a car, you could write off the entire payment. Additionally, long about May, you would reach the withholding limit on your Social security payments and start seeing the additional income on your paycheck.

St. Ronnie took care of all that. Now, If I can somehow manage to keep my house out of foreclosure, I can still write off my mortgage interest but nothing else.

Tax cuts my ass!

The workers were once again fucked by our feudal lords.

Welcome to the neo-feudalism.

I bet most of you didn't know this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. I remember that. It was Reagan's "favor" to the working class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
52. I remember when I could deduct credit card interest. SIGH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Another Bill C. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. As I recall,
all charitable contributions were deductible whether you itemized your deductions or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
48. And medical expenses. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. That sounds almost unbeliveable
I'm 23. Man, Reagan was great :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I bet it does sound unbelievable now but that's the way it was
We, the workers of the world have been asked to bear the burden while our masters frolic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
34. Yeap, I'm 36..I have to see this to beleive it almost..RayGun fuckin sucked why did we vote for him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes and every penny of health care - none of this 7% crap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes you're right. Every bottle of asprin, cold pills, and even
mileage to & from the Dr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Weren't taxes cigarettes deductible too? It wasn't a lot, but
it was so much a pack multiplied by how many packs you estimated you bought that year. I remember my cousin telling me that even though his mother never smoked, she always was a smoker on her tax return. Yea I sure do remember.

A tax specialist told me back then to also keep every receipt you got for the whole year. Just make a box and drop the receipt in when you take the items out of the bag. If you are ever questioned about deducting actual sales tax, just bring in the box...unsorted...put it on the agents desk and say "here's my documentation". Most of the time, they just stamp the return accepted as filed rather than sort through all that mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I never got that much into it but I think you could write off all state
taxes from your Federal income if you could prove you paid them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
38. You still can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sadly that did NOT apply the Barbie Dream car I had at the time. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yeah, I'm sorry too
But you can't have everything.

Check with Tiger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. lol! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 05:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
54. If you'd put it on your credit card you would have been able to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. I remember deducting interest on everything - I didn't realize it was St Ronnie that took it away.


Thank you for enlightening me tonite!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yeah, tax cut Ronnie
Biggest deficit increase in the history of the country.

Biggest tax increase in workers since I don't know.

Government sucks. Elect us and we'll prove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. I believe the first $200 of interest
from a savings account was exempt from taxes and I think RR took that one away. I know RR started taxing unemployment compensation, he said unemployment was just a paid vacation for Union workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yeah, I'm having a great vacation trying to pay my bills
On half my income. I guess having a knot in your stomach 24/7 is his idea of a vacation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl_interrupted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I don't...but my parents and grandparents do
Just like you said..you could deduct the interest you paid on all loans, credit cards, etc. And not only that...when you had a savings account, you collected really good interest rates on your money.

If ever there was a time to bring something like back...it's now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. That's why I'm writing this.
You don't remember. You don't know, but you should. It wasn't always like this and it doesn't have to stay this way. It has been different in the past and can be again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl_interrupted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Thank you for writing this
I hear my family talking about it, and I don't understand why it changed and why it isn't brought back. And I have no answer for that. So I'm glad someone like you brought it up. Thank you! K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. I think the first $200 of savings account interest was not
taxed either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. I remember being able to do that. Doctors bills were also
deductible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
57. Yep, and not only if they exceeded a certain percentage of your income.
Every dime you spent on medical care AND medical insurance was deductible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
21. All these People remember but no one thinks we are being taxed?
I don't get it.

Every time they take a dime out of your pocket and give you nothing in return, you are being taxed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl_interrupted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. yes and I doubt Obama will bring this back
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 01:09 AM by girl_interrupted
Look at the credit card bill he signed this year...no caps. We are at the mercy of banks that hold credit cards,and mortgages, etc . They get interest free loans via our tax dollars, for bailouts. I wish I could believe things will change, but I don't anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
23. I remember those days
I was telling this to my 20 year old son and his friends not long ago. They thought I was joking.

The post-Reagan generations haven't a clue on how it was and could be because they are 'trained' to accept what they are not given.

Back in the day you could make a modest income and live quite nicely. We had a house, two cars, a cabin & property, took nice vacations, raised & educated our children and celebrated a prosperous Christmas. Nowadays, you literally break the bank just to provide the fixings for a Thanksgiving dinner.

The betrayal is glaring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
24. That's when Ronnie the Raygun had the great idea that "the little people" should pay the largest
burden of taxes in this country. His rationale: if the rich paid less taxes, their wealth would somehow "trickle down" to the rest of us. Of course Bush the Elder termed the Raygun economic folly: voodoo economics, a term he soon forgot once he was elected Vice Caretaker... er, I mean, Vice President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #24
32. To be fair, their claim is that the rich would invest in businesses
And those businesses employ people. But it doesn't seem to work that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. To be really fair, that meme was just the song and dance du jour...
It was all part of the largest transfer of wealth in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
46. But they did invest in new businesses, and employ people.
In China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
25. Wow... just... Wow.
"$100,000.00 more than I paid for it."

So, a disgustingly rich person is claiming that post-Reagan, they couldn't make $100,000 in a month, for doing absolutely nothing... they'd only make $10,000 that month, for doing.... ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

..and then complaining about the tax benefits, because while they could afford a $100,000+ house (assuming it was worth $1 when they bought it), their ability to avoid taxation was reduced.

Is this a parody that I'm missing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Uh,
He wasn't complaining about ONLY being able to make $10,000. It was an illustration of the results of Reagan policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #25
42. No, what you are missing is the fact that short term capital gains
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 11:25 AM by OffWithTheirHeads
taxes were so high that they discouraged "flipping" and encouraged you to keep your capital invested. That is what I did. Kept the house. Unfortunately, at that same time, Paul Volker, then head of the Fed,shortly before the election spiked the discount rate, supposedly to "whip inflation". Interest rates on home loans climbed into the 18% range, the job market collapsed because no one could afford to borrow and you couldn't sell a house to save your life. This little stunt, combined with the deal Ronnie made with the Iranians to not release the hostages until inauguration day insured Ronnie's election. By the way, this "rich" guy was a construction worker. His wife was a real estate Agent. We worked our asses off and made a comfortable living until then. With the collapse of the real estate market and all construction work, we ended up loosing everything we had worked all of our lives for including the house. Rich indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hersheygirl Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
27. Wasn't that also around the time
they started the "earned income credit" where if you only earned so much they would give so much extra for dependents even though you did not earn it or pay taxes on it. I know of several people that only work for part of the year so they can qualify for it, and most of them get the limit, some get up to 5,000.00. Then they brag about all the money they got from their income tax return. Between welfare and their income tax return, they make a pretty good living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
28. 1986 tax reforn ended most deductions for the middle class
My father, who did taxes for HR BLock for 30 some years, stated the 1986 tax reform under ole Ronnie Raygun fucked up everything from the middle class and he was a republican at the time..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #28
36. I know PLENTY of tax prepairers are liberals because of that decade. They saw FIRST HAND what RayGun
...was doing to the middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
29. I remember all that has been mentioned.
I also remember when unemployment benefits were not taxed and when there was no limit to how much money you could put into your 401K tax deferred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
30. I remember that.
I also remember when Social Security and unemployment benefits were not subject to income taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
31. I remember that
And what was the point of dong away with it? It stimulates borrowing and purchasing. The auto industry should have fought it. Another Raygun fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
33. My GOD!!! Why did this guy get voted for TWICE?! Do reThugs hate America?!?!?!?
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 10:26 AM by uponit7771
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puglover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
37. I do.
I used to buy a new car every few years or so. No more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
39. i know that putting that profit into your next house purchase would have prevented that
Edited on Thu Dec-17-09 10:45 AM by mkultra
so im not sure how i feel about your story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
40. I do
They tightened up the whole tax code, actually. I remember that I paid over 2k more from one year to the next.

Ronnie, the man advertised as a tax cutter, was not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
41. Where did you get all this information?
For disclosure purposes, I am a tax CPA.

Now, first of all, your good friend was/is a moron. The capital gains rate has never been over 35%.

http://www.cch.com/wbot2005/019CapitalGainsHistory.asp

The short term rate would have been 70%, at the top:

http://www.taxfoundation.org/files/federalindividualratehistory-20080107.pdf

However, you did touch on something few people actually realize, but drew the wrong conclusion. Taxes that you or I pay is a component of TWO inputs - taxable income AND the tax rate. You are correct in saying tax rates were much higher, but there were also a TON more in write-offs available. What you miss is that this method of tax is MUCH more regressive and affects the poor and working class much worse that the rich. The tax act of 1986 removed MANY of these write-offs, with the trade-off being lower income tax rates. Taxes collected were exxentially unchanged as a percentage of GDP. However, I would have to bet that while most people were paying the same, they should have seen a decrease in their compliance costs, as the code was much less complicated.

If you are interested, there is a great article by a Harvard economist in the December issue of Money magazine essentially discussing just this. Many in Congress want to do away with the deduction for mortgages altogether. His recommendation (which I agree with) is to lower the limit on what is deductible from a $1,000,000 loan to a $250,000. This still allows the working class to benefit, but removes the regressive nature of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. Well for starters, this was 30 years ago and I was and still am
a construction worker, not a CPA so I may have the exact numbers a little fuzzy but the point is that high short term capital gains rates encouraged you to keep your capital invested, not just take the money and run.

I don't know about your second paragraph as a percentage of GDP. What I do know is that I never again made enough money to be able to stop paying into SSI.

As to your Harvard economist, I have seen enough of the damage to the working class that Harvard economists have done to last me a lifetime. Stanford economists too (see Arthur Laffer)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
44. I remember quite well. Those were the years
when I would get a tax return instead of having to pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
45. Interest on credit card purchases, too.
Yes, I remember that. I'm so old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
47. Yes...and since folks need one to get to work in most cases, it should be
deductible again. Nice Post....Remember the days...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. If you are a big corporate CEO you still get all those breaks +
Limo and driver to take you to work and back= business expense
Meals at the corporate executive cafateria = business expense
Lear jet at your disposal = business expense
Country club membership = business expense
vaca..I mean business trip to Aruba = business expense
The list goes on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. True...times have changed...........I guess we gotta get used to it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Blue in PDX Donating Member (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
51. I remember those days fondly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
53. Yup, and tuition. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pecwae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
55. I also recall that taxes on utility bills
were deductible at one time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
56. I remember survivor Social Security used to pay up through college.

It did for me and my sibs. Our father died when we were little kids.

St. Ronnie's minions put an end to that too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC