A very nasty anti Obama article today from Charles Krauthammer

You can put in a rating of the article at the site from today's Chicago Tribune. The lowest rating you can give it is 0 out of 5 stars:

Obama's doctrine: Lead from behind


"Obama may be moving toward something resembling a doctrine. One of his advisers described the president's actions in Libya as "leading from behind." — Ryan Lizza, the New Yorker, May 2.

To be precise, leading from behind is a style, not a doctrine. Doctrines involve ideas, but since there are no discernible ones that make sense of Obama foreign policy — Lizza's painstaking two-year chronicle shows it to be as ad hoc, erratic and confused as it appears — this will have to do.


more ugly stuff at: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/obama/ct-oped-0502-krauthammer-20110502,0,7381418.story

light. He is so predictable in his negativity that
he loses credibility.

Don't waste your time like I just did.

Krauthammer is so obviously pissed that Obama is the one who got bin Laden that he is ranting jibberish.

Bite us, Chuckie.

His entire schtick consists of seeming to be calm and reasonable while spouting the most vile of lies.

He's too cerebral for the Teahadii and too full shit for any thinking person, so he's reaching only a very limited minority of the (R) party - basically acting as an echo chamber for Congressional (R) talking points.

No matter, he still makes my skin crawl.

Nu?

.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

I wish there were a spit icon here.

Krauthammer never met a neocon idea that failed to moisten his panties.