Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Insurers will have to justify rate increases over 10 percent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 04:06 PM
Original message
Insurers will have to justify rate increases over 10 percent

Insurers will have to justify rate increases over 10 percent

by Joan McCarter

Amid numerous reports of massive rate increases, and profits, for health insurance companies in the new Affordable Care Act universe, the Obama administration is demanding that insurers begin justifying proposed rate increases in September of this year

Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of health and human services, issued a final rule establishing procedures for federal and state insurance experts to scrutinize premiums. Insurers, she said, will have to justify rate increases in an environment in which they are doing well financially, with profits exceeding the expectations of many Wall Street analysts.

“Health insurance companies have recently reported some of their highest profits in years and are holding record reserves,” Ms. Sebelius said. “Insurers are seeing lower medical costs as people put off care and treatment in a recovering economy, but many insurance companies continue to raise their rates. Often, these increases come without any explanation or justification.”

Federal health officials proposed the 10 percent threshold in December. The insurance industry criticized it as an arbitrary test that could brand a majority of rate increases as presumptively unreasonable. But the administration rejected the criticism and insisted on the 10 percent standard in the final rule, issued Thursday.

Beginning in September 2012, the government will set separate thresholds for the states, depending on health care and insurance costs in those states. In the meantime, insurers will have to abide by the 10 percent threshold. Note that it doesn't mean insurers can't increase premiums above 10 percent, but that they will have to justify those increases. Insurers, of course, don't like it and say that the rule will do nothing to "address the underlying costs of health care, which they described as the main factor driving up premiums." Which does deflect from the issue of insurance company profits.

This new rule comes in the midst of a rhetorical war waging this week between industry group America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) and health care advocacy group Health Care for America Now (HCAN) over the industry's profits. Former insurance company executive Wendell Potter writes about it at HuffPo:

Robert Zirkelbach, spokesman for America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) took aim at the health care advocacy group Health Care for America Now (HCAN). HCAN took issue with AHIP's assertion that the average profit margin for health insurance firms is just 4.4 percent. Zirkelbach did not explain how he came up with that figure, but considering the fact that the big for-profit insurers had significantly higher margins than 4.4 percent last year (according to Yahoo! Finance), AHIP's calculations must have included the insurers that, at least in theory, don't make profits at all, like the so-called nonprofit Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans.

In a memo to editors and reporters Thursday afternoon, HCAN took issue with the 4.4 percent figure and accused AHIP of trying to pull the wool over journalists' eyes.

"AHIP's focus on profit margins is misleading and designed to protect their massive income by shifting attention away from their return on equity—a key measure of profits as a percentage of the amount invested," HCAN's executive director, Ethan Rome, wrote.

"That return is a phenomenal 16.1 percent as of today. By that measure, health insurers are ranked fourth highest of the 16 industries in the health care sector. The health insurance industry has a higher return for investors than cell phone companies, beer companies, mortgage companies, life insurance companies, TV broadcasters, drug store companies, or grocery stores."

The drivers of health insurance costs, the industry will say, is doctors practicing "defensive medicine" and "fraud and abuse in the entire system." However:

more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. would that it were "above the rate of inflation".
maybe in another 2 generations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think the Feds
have this authority. States do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Here,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That confirms
my thinking. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Err... there was this massive health care reform bill a year or so ago
Which gave HHS this authority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-11 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Wrong. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. of course, that does nothing for the folks who have had rate increases of 50% or better in the last
year. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Point taken. There's an acknowledgment of this problem in the linked NYT's article.
Federal officials acknowledged that they did not have the authority to block rates that were found to be unjustified. But they said many states had such authority, and the federal government is providing $250 million to states to strengthen their capacity. A small number of states, opposed to the federal health care law, have turned down the money.

The new rule says a rate increase is unreasonable if it is excessive, unjustified or “unfairly discriminatory.” An increase is deemed excessive if it is “unreasonably high in relation to the benefits provided.”

Consumer advocates generally welcomed the rule. “The days of insurance companies running roughshod over consumers and jacking up rates whenever they want are over,” said Ethan S. Rome, executive director of Health Care for America Now, a coalition that includes labor unions and civil rights groups.


States will have the primary responsibility for reviewing rate increases. “But if a state does not have the authority or the resources to conduct a review, our department will step in,” said Ms. Sebelius, a former state insurance commissioner in Kansas.

Under the rule, as part of an effective rate review program, states must have “a mechanism for receiving public comments” on proposed rate increases.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/20/us/politics/20health.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC