Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Krugman: Ma! He’s Looking At Me Funny! Watch (and a response to David Brooks' column)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 02:26 PM
Original message
Krugman: Ma! He’s Looking At Me Funny! Watch (and a response to David Brooks' column)
Krugman: Ma! He’s Looking At Me Funny! Watch

Oh, my: apparently the new line on the right is that the economy is weakening because Obama, that nasty man, said bad things about Paul Ryan.

I am not making this up. In fact, I don’t think I could have made this up.



Krugman's on a roll: Flim-Flammed

I’ve been getting requests that I respond to my colleague David Brooks’s column today. Actually, I’ll just outsource it. Read Ezra Klein, Jonathan Chait, and Jonathan Cohn. The bottom line is, sorry, the evidence is indeed dispositive: decentralized, “consumer-based” health care is worse, and far more expensive, than universal systems run by the government.

<...>

Which brings me to one last point: it’s really time to stop pretending that the Ryan plan is an intellectually sound expression of a philosophical viewpoint. Even from its own ideological perspective, it’s a piece of incompetent junk; all you had to do was spend a little while poking through the assumptions, and it became clear that it was nonsense. I know this is a hard thing for people who gushed about the plan to accept, but it’s the simple truth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. They needed to explain what "intellectually sound expression of a philosophical viewpoint"
It wasn't intended to be a good thing for the public. Their philosophy is to destroy all that is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R Get Krugman to the WH right away.
They need him. Badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MattSh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not holding my breath waiting for that... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hwmnbn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. K & R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Interesting to see David Frum tearing Michael Barone a new one.
From The New Republic:

http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/89517/obama-lied-paul-ryan-cried-the-economy-died

The new line on the right is that the economy is now swooning because President Obama criticized Paul Ryan. Here's Michael Barone:

On April 13 Obama delivered a ballyhooed speech at George Washington University. ...
The man depicted as pragmatic and free of ideological cant indulged in cheap political rhetoric, accusing Republicans, including House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan who was in the audience, of pushing old ladies in wheelchairs down the hill and starving autistic children.


(SNIP)

David Frum rebuts:

I would myself lay much more emphasis on economic factors like: (i) the continuing destruction of American consumer wealth as housing prices deflate; (ii) the burden of rising oil prices; (iii) the collective decision of American consumers to increase their saving by 6 points of personal income – a laudable decision, but one that subtracts a lot of demand from the economy.

But if I were a believer in the business confidence theory, here’s the counter-question I’d put to Michael Barone:

Which is more likely to subtract from business confidence: a lame speech by the president – or a highly credible and sustained threat by the majority party in the House of Representatives to force a default on the debts, contracts, and other obligations of the United States?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cracklin Charlie Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nicely done on both counts!. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC