Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kyl puts a price in his ransom note

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 07:17 AM
Original message
Kyl puts a price in his ransom note
Posted with permission.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal/2011_06/kyl_puts_a_price_in_his_ransom030116.php


June 08, 2011 8:00 AM
Kyl puts a price in his ransom note

By Steve Benen


A month ago, Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), who is participating in the White House’s debt-reduction talks, said Republicans would expect $6 trillion in cuts over the next decade in exchange for raising the debt ceiling. The demand was laughably insane.

Yesterday, Kyl floated a new number.

The Senate’s No. 2 Republican on Tuesday spelled out GOP leaders’ conditions in the negotiations over reducing the federal deficit, offering the most specific outline of the party’s demands thus far.

Minority Whip Jon Kyl (Ariz.) told reporters that Republicans want $2.5 trillion in budget savings in exchange for voting to raise the country’s $14.3 trillion borrowing limit through the end of next year.

“You’d have to do about $2.4 trillion in debt ceiling,” Kyl said, “which means you’d have to be about $2 1/2 trillion — at a minimum — in savings.”


Oddly enough, there are a few reasons to actually be mildly encouraged by this. For one thing, $2.5 trillion is not quite as preposterous as $6 trillion. For another, Kyl specifically used the word “savings.” In fact, in talking to reporters, he said the word more than once. Back in early May, the Senate Minority Whip was talking about trillions in “spending cuts,” and by referencing “savings,” the implication is that some of the debt-reduction effort can come through additional revenue, which would be a step in the right direction.

And perhaps most importantly, last month Kyl put a timeline on all of this — he wanted massive cuts over the next 10 years. Yesterday, the conservative senator said he wants trillions, but didn’t say how many years this could be stretched over.

That’s the good news. The bad news is, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said a month ago he expected about $2 trillion in exchange for doing the right thing. Yesterday, Kyl said $2.5 trillion. To this extent, we appear to be moving in the wrong direction.

It was also discouraging to hear Kyl say he expected to wrap up talks sometime in July. Boehner and President Obama signaled an agreement last week to complete this process by the Fourth of July in order to prevent panic in global markets. If the Senate Republican leader intends to blow off this deadline and push talks even further into July, it may prove to be very dangerous for all of us.

Of course, there’s also the problem Kyl is reinforcing the Republican Party’s hostage strategy, making clear that the GOP will cause a recession, on purpose, unless Democrats give Republicans massive spending cuts.

And then there’s the small matter of actually trying to find $2.5 trillion in budget savings that will satisfy Republicans enough that they won’t shoot their hostage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avant Guardian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just ditch all of the Bush tax cuts
Problem solved, budget balanced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. The U.S. has gone from "We don't negotiate with terrorists" to
voting them in as Republicans ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC