Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AARP says the Wall Street Journal story is a lie

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 05:03 PM
Original message
AARP says the Wall Street Journal story is a lie
Edited on Fri Jun-17-11 05:04 PM by TheBigotBasher
AARP CEO A. Barry Rand offered the following statement in response to inaccurate media stories on the association's policy on Social Security:

"Let me be clear—AARP is as committed as we've ever been to fighting to protect Social Security for today's seniors and strengthening it for future generations. Contrary to the misleading characterization in a recent media story, AARP has not changed its position on Social Security.

"First, we are currently fighting some proposals in Washington to cut Social Security to reduce a deficit it did not cause. Social Security should not be used as a piggy bank to solve the nation's deficit. Any changes to this lifeline program should happen in a separate, broader discussion and make retirement more secure for future generations, not less.

"Our focus has always been on the human impact of changes, not just the budget tables. Which is why, as we have done numerous times over the last several decades, AARP is engaging our volunteer Board to evaluate any proposed changes to Social Security to determine how each might—individually or in different combinations—impact the lives of current and future retirees given the constantly changing economic realities they face.

"Second, we have maintained for years—to our members, the media and elected officials—that long term solvency is key to protecting and strengthening Social Security for all generations, and we have urged elected officials in Washington to address the program's long-term challenges in a way that's fair for all generations....

"Social Security is a critically important issue for our members, their families and Americans of all ages, especially at a time when many will have less retirement security than previous generations with fewer pensions, less savings and rising health care costs. And, as we have been for decades, we will continue to protect this bedrock of lifetime financial security for all generations of Americans."


Stop jumping on people who are on side. Republicants are at war with AARP and are doing anything and everything to discredit and destroy them. For very obvious reasons.

(update - corrected original news source)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Then...
Fuck you Wall Street Journal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. AARP is first and foremost an insurance company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Are they any good, compared to other insurance providers? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. AARP never said the Wall Street Journal story is a lie. Please provide the quote?
AARP has not made it clear today where they stand. They have discussed it in terms of
inaccurate or misleading stories, but did not refute that it is a lie.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-17/aarp-says-it-will-back-social-security-cuts-to-ensure-solvency.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "inaccurate or misleading"
= LIE.

The GOP have set their targets on AARP, watch the continued drip, drip, drip of smears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I respectfully disagree. Inaccurate or misleading implies that not everything said was incorrect
In fact if they came out and said point blank they would oppose any cuts in social security period, not just in reference to the deficiet, that would mean something

There was an interview today, and something in that interview left the impression to the reporter that there was wiggle room in cuts to social security acceptance from certain leaders at AARP

In fact when asked about that from other outlets, they indicated they have always been open to things, including cuts or raising the age for retirement to insure solvency of social security

Furthermore, they said that has been their longstanding policy, it is just that most members did not realize that

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SolutionisSolidarity Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. No, lie = lie. Inaccurate or misleading just means that AARP wants to spin their betrayal.
These are obvious weasel words you always here in a PR pushback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. except that there is some truth the story..
From CBS News...

The nation's most powerful senior's group telling the Wall Street Journal it was ready to deal on cutting social security benefits. The AARP's policy chief John Rother admitting "some of our members will no doubt be upset." So upset that within hours the AARP was insisting this was always their position, CBS News correspondent Nancy Cordes reports.

"We can make changes that are modest and we can make changes with a great deal of lead time so we don't need to affect anyone who is currently retired today or near retirement," said said David Certner, AARP's legislative policy director.

Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/06/17/eveningnews/main20072092.shtml#ixzz1PZsvUw27

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. It should be clear that these AARP spokes people do NOT speak for the majority of AARP members /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That quote was from the AARP's Legislative Policy Director..
not just a "spokesperson". As Legislative Policy Director, I would think he knows what the organization's legislative policies are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I wasn't disagreeing with you, just saying that the members he represents I don't think share his
views
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. yes, that is probably true.
no doubt they will not like what he had to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Just saw an ad from AARP promoting Republican proposal and selling more insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC