Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So yet again we have a serviceman who was about to be discharged

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:45 AM
Original message
So yet again we have a serviceman who was about to be discharged
but for the Log Cabin GOP.

http://gay.americablog.com/2011/07/airmans-dadt-discharge-suspended-as.html

Andrew Harmon has direct confirmation that the DADT discharge policy has finally changed -- from a servicemember facing discharge:

Airman 1st Class Justin Dailey said Friday that he had been served with discharge paperwork on June 9 after his sexual orientation came to the attention of his command. Dailey said he did not make a voluntary statement on his sexual orientation and was not seeking separation from the Armed Forces.

Stationed at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, Dailey said he was told on Thursday — one day after the ninth circuit’s order lifting the stay on U.S. district judge Virginia Phillips’s injunction against DADT — that his discharge proceedings had been suspended. “I had intended on fighting this tooth and nail,” Dailey said. “I’m happy I can proceed with my career and get back to work.”

Dailey’s account was confirmed by Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, which has represented the airman in collaboration with his military defense attorney. SLDN spokesman Zeke Stokes said that the military attorney had received notification via phone of Dailey’s discharge suspension but has not yet received specific written communication from defense officials.

Why the hell did Dailey even get discharge orders on June 9th?

As pointed out in the post below, not everyone got the news. Jim Pietrangelo tried to re-enlist today and couldn't -- because he's gay.

end of quote (nothing else at link)

Let's be blunt here. This serviceman would be facing discharge today had the Log Cabin case gone the other way. Time after time after time we have been told this policy is over. Time after time after time we were told this as we provided example after example of service men being discharged. Here is yet another one. This should have been certified months ago. This man shouldn't have had to fight tooth and nail. I am so glad this policy is finally gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. And there are the facts.
The Log Cabin Kidz did good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Remember when
the claim was made that the best way to deal with this is through the courts?

Now it's done, and after the President signed the repeal into law.

A win, credit the LCR.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Pretty definitive
thanks DSC.

I can't imagine why anyone would be pissed off by Judge Phillip's ruling nor the 9th circuit panel's lifting of the stay.

DADT has now been officially killed. People who wanted it dead should be thrilled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The human condition is the look for the bad in everything
and to never be happy even when you get exactly what you wanted or at least that is my observation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriMera Donating Member (885 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think you're owed a few apologies
but I'm fairly sure you won't receive them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC