Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chris Cillizza - Liberals are losers in this deal, Tea Party winners

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 08:39 PM
Original message
Chris Cillizza - Liberals are losers in this deal, Tea Party winners
Losers:
Liberals: As the basic framework of the deal emerged, liberals began voicing their discontent about a bargain that left their side wanting more. With no revenue in the initial phase of the legislation and Medicare cuts on the table in the second phase, there’s not much for the ideological left to celebrate.


Winners:
The tea party: inside and outside Congress — will almost certainly be emboldened by the result of this fight.


As a progressive, I am furious.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-debt-ceiling-deal-winners-and-losers/2011/07/31/gIQAHl7FmI_story.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Apparently someone needs to inform the Teabaggers that they "won"
because they don't see it that way.

Interesting how the far end of each party is claiming defeat and rollover. How can that be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Because it was a COMPRIMISE..
and both the far left & far right hate that word equally. But, in reality - both sides got somethings that they wanted (no tax increases for them, extended to '13 for us), and both hate some things in there.

It's not perfect.. but I'm not really sure what better deal we would have been able to get either. It's not like the House was going to just change their minds over-night and give Obama whatever he wanted. Hell.. 1/3 of them wanted to freaking default.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. I think your definition of the "far end" means anyone to the left of Evan Bayh
I know a number of moderate mainstream Democrats. And they are furious about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. He lives to write that
I don't like it, but neither do they.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yup,
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 08:44 PM by ProSense
I expect the teabaggers in the House to vote for this bill!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. should have though about that in November
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Think about what he said ....
"With no revenue in the initial phase" = there is in the second phase.
"Medicare cuts on the table in the second phase" = there no cuts on the table now.

Obama declared the Medicare cuts to be "modest adjustments" and I believe him. And there are quite a few adjustments I can think of that need to made in Medicare that do not effect the benefits. Adjusting the purchase of drugs in Part D is one. Reimbursements to provider hospitals is another.

The pundits on TV are just trying hard to perpetuate the punditry. I'm sick of it. I read for myself and don't give a good crap what any of these commentators think. I frequently listen to the same speeches and hear things never mentioned by anyone. People hear what they want to hear, and I HATE SPIN, especially in slogans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. You believe Obama -- I used to make that mistake too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Are you using these boards to express your frustration, in spite ot fhe hope and change campaign
rhetoric...these boards are a public opportunity for you to express your undying support for the President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I initially bought in to the hope and change campaign. But now I consider it a fraud. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melissaf Donating Member (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. because we wouldn't want any democrats
to support the president. Oh, no. We want to curl up in a little ball of cynicism and wither away to nothing. That'll teach the Republicans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vroomvroom Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Have Liberals won ANY FIGHT since the 70s? I am curious.
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 09:31 PM by vroomvroom
And i mean a fight that special interests had lots of $$ at stake if they lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. all this crap about who won and who lost
is just spinning. On this board, the spinning should be for us, not them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. So apparently we should continue to allow the right to screw us, and then to
make matters worse we should try to spin it to make it not look so bad after all. Got it. Then they will continue to screw us all the while we will be whistling in the dark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why do the teabagger think they lost?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melissaf Donating Member (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks, Chris C
I'm sure your brilliant powers of prescience...oh, forget it. This guy's not worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. teabaggers didn't want the limit raised
so I'd say they lost too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Exactly. Why is everyone missing that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. The Teabaggers got rolled by the GOP Old Guard.
This isn't even a Pyhrric Victory for them; it was their Waterloo.

NO WAY is Big Money going to let their vast fortunes be held hostage by a bunch of ignorant, know-nothing, suicide mission politicians like the Teabaggers.

The money spigot will not be opened for them again, and their 'grass-roots' fund-raising will not be able to overcome massive money from mainstream Republican sources in any primary or election.

They are toast.

I can't wait to hear the music of their wailing; it will be all for naught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
19. definitely not a tea party victory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
21. Paul Krugman - The President Surrenders
In fact, Republicans will surely be emboldened by the way Mr. Obama keeps folding in the face of their threats. He surrendered last December, extending all the Bush tax cuts; he surrendered in the spring when they threatened to shut down the government; and he has now surrendered on a grand scale to raw extortion over the debt ceiling. Maybe it’s just me, but I see a pattern here.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/01/opinion/the-president-surrenders-on-debt-ceiling.html?_r=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC