Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't like this deal at all, but don't feel the President/Dems had any choice at this point

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:14 PM
Original message
I don't like this deal at all, but don't feel the President/Dems had any choice at this point
It's impossible to come out on top when dealing with people who are controlled by a handful of people who are crazy enough to blow up the economy.

This is not a classic case of refusing to blink first. The President and Democratic and Republican leadership were trying to diffuse a ticking timebomb and were dealing with a group of people who really don't care whether the bomb goes off. But letting the bomb go off was not an option, period. So that ensured that we weren't going to get much, if anything, out of this - except the bomb not going off.

This is extremely frustrating - and I fear that the Tea Party has created a new method of political negotiating.

But I don't believe the President and Dems "caved" and I really can't see what they could have realistically done differently - realistically being the operative term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trueblue2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. i agree with you. the PIGS control the congress. we could not do better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Dems haven't had any choice in 31 years. How could that be? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. That's exactly my reaction
Whether they are in power (majority) or out of it, the GOp always gets its way.

Whether we are in power or out of it, Democrats never get our way.

Odd how that works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. That's because the Dems aren't crazy and actually care about the country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. But the GOP always do the same things. And so do we. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. There's some truth to this
The "deal" is signed right now, but the battle will still be waged over the next 18 months.

It's a bad deal right now, but the ultimate verdict isn't in yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Poor, poor Prresident ...
... and hapless Democrats.

They had no choice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Lots of good things for the dems in it ....
No default.

No slashes to Medicare, did not touch SS, and Medicaid is still intact!

The Bush tax cuts are being left untouched, meaning they WILL expire December 31, 2012!

And there is NO Balanced Budget Amendment stipulation in the new agreement :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. How does not doing anything about the Bush tax cuts now
mean they won't be extended in 2012? -- You really think Obama will have the spine not to push for them in an election year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. I believe that one of Obama's main 2012 campaign messages will be ...
make the millionaires and billionaires pay their fair share.

So, I do not see Obama ever agreeing to extend the Bush tax cuts.

The tax cuts expire December 31, 2012 which is AFTER the election.

He will win re-elect in and the tax cuts WILL expire.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. That WAS one of Obama's MAIN 2008 Campaign Promises.
But THIS time will be different? :shrug:

Hey, maybe he can use THAT for a Campaign Slogan.

THIS time, it will be different!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Agar Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. In order to "cave" you need to have stood for something.
Since they really didn't, I agree with you on the "cave" business.

The Dems are the Republicans now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnoopDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. So if terrorists infiltrated our Congress and demanded that they Nuke NCY - that's ok?
It is the same thing. They are making terrorists demands to destroy our economy. And we are supposed to agree with their demands?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. It's not the same thing ...
The more apt analogy would be if terrorists threatened to nuke NYC unless we cut $10 billion from the city's budget by closing all of the schools in Harlem, firing all of the street cleaners and shutting down the subway system 3 days a week - and it was clear that they really were ready, willing and able to carry out their threat and had no incentive NOT to do it.

If we came out with a deal in which they agreed not to nuke the city in return for a process that would result in $5 billion in cuts through various means that could include closing some schools, firing some street cleaners and reducing subway service, but could also include getting rid of limousine subsidies, eliminating private airports and increasing taxes on the wealthiest residents that could take some of the burden off of the schools, workers and subways, that could be seen as the best possible bargain under the circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why don't you like it? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's almost as if the Tea Party are suicide bombers...
They really don't CARE if the blow up the economy.. and take the whole country down with it. Their "RELIGION" is Patriotism.. and they have no problem sacrificing their own financial safety net as well as the safety nets of others if it furthers their "CAUSE".

It's really not much different then Osama Bin Laden.. they're a cult.. and they hide amoungst civilians. Makes me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Exactly
So it is not very reasonable to expect the kind of result we would get if we were negotiating on an even playing field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
16. A large part of political skill is about not allowing yourself to get cornered like this.
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 04:04 AM by JVS
The debt ceiling should have been part of what the republicans had to concede in order to renew the Bush tax cuts, as it provides a source of funds necessary to run the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Huh?
Obama does NOT want to renew the Bush tax cuts.
If anything the GOP would have held the deficit ceiling hostage to get the Bush tax cuts 'extended' - and the GOP did not do that.
The tax cuts for the millionaires and billionaires have to GO - so that we will have more revenue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveofCali Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
19. "First of all, he could and should have demanded an increase in the debt ceiling back in December."
"When asked why he didn’t, he replied that he was sure that Republicans would act responsibly. Great call."
- Paul Krugman, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/01/opinion/the-president-surrenders-on-debt-ceiling.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
20. He has The Constitution and his party was asking him to use it. ALLEN SIMPSON on an SS committee???
PLease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
21. According to John Conyers and just about everyone else too,
Obama put Medicare and SS cuts on the table, not the Republicans.

So all this, he had no choice but to do this to get the ceiling raised is a bunch of bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
22. Barney Frank agrees with you.
That's good enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
24. In order to "like" or "not like" this deal we'd actually have to know what is in it -
and no one is telling us that. And don't cite the white house "fact sheet" to me either - that is full of flowerly language without actual numbers that mean anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tweeternik Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
26. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC