|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 06:54 PM Original message |
So the Party Line is now "Obama compromised because he wanted BIGGER cuts" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. Gee, I miss Howard Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bitchkitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 07:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Me too! Makes me cry. :( n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think the Party line is Republicans were never serious about deficit reduction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 07:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. They aren't serious about it....But it shouldn't be our priority now either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
3. What did he give up' Armstead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 07:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. He gave up a Grand Bargain that Reagan would have been proud of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
4. dumb asses... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DarthDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
5. That's Not What She Said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 07:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. THere was no nuance in that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 07:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. ^ Agree re: job creation ^ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 07:07 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. They see their markets overseas now because we are becoming an economic backwater |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DarthDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 07:10 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Good Idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
6. compounding the damage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Life Long Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
8. Obama originally wanted $4 trillion in 12 years or less. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
11. Deleted message |
pa28 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
15. What you are now witnessing is the most masterful rope-a-dope . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 07:17 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. He is rope-a-doping liberals and progressives... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 07:23 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. You're right, PA28. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pa28 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 08:14 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. You should be concerned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 08:22 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Fox news exists to tamp down the rebellion impulse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
18. So *'s unfunded spending was actually liberal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-01-11 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
19. Because Obama wanted 4 trillion versus the 2.3/2.4 trillion they went with. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC