Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scott Brown calls for civility. Brown's supporters insult Warren and women in general

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 08:30 AM
Original message
Scott Brown calls for civility. Brown's supporters insult Warren and women in general
Edited on Mon Oct-03-11 08:31 AM by Mass
http://belmont.patch.com/articles/brown-regulations-costs-wet-blanket-for-businesses
"I've been disgusted lately to the complete breakdown of civility in Washington," said Brown at a breakfast meeting hosted by the Watertown Belmont Chamber of Commerce at the Belmont Country Club Wednesday, Sept. 28.


The same Scott Brown whose supporters have this blog post
http://bluemassgroup.com/2011/10/new-internet-dirty-tricks-from-brown-backers/

Hard on the heels of top Scott Brown advisor “Craz-E” Eric Fehrnstrom’s outing as the long-hidden author of the “CrazyKhazei” attack site against Democratic Senate candidate Alan Khazei, comes a blog-based assault on Elizabeth Warren headlined by Beauchamp Brogan Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Tennessee Glenn Reynolds through his blog Instapundit, part of the ultra-Republican Pajamas Media conglomerate.



How this kind of ham-handed attack can advance Scott Brown’s campaign for re-election is hard to say, but what I find significant is Brown’s unwillingness to go on the record to condemn this and similar Internet-based attacks against Warren, combined with his refusal to apologize for Fehrnstrom’s dirty tricks against Khazei, or to sanction his top aide.

Brown is easy to attack as a poser — not a real Senator — and the more he claims to oppose dirty campaigning while simultaneously employing a confessed online trickster in a top position and not condeming perverse campaigns like this one, the wider his credibility gap grows.


I guess Mr Brown is going to apologize quickly, for the sake of civility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. LOL. She's already been portrayed as a liberal elitist and last week
the republicants were calling her a communist and linking her to a communist newspaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. He'll apologize for the sake of not losing this election
And from what I've heard around his home town, he can be very nasty himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is completely obnoxious on so many levels
It is not done by Brown's people, but the ugliness of it means he likely will have to call the author out for writing it. (I don't see what he has to apologize for as his staff did not do this and I think the idea that they set the tone is too subtle for Brown.)

What is strange is that it is not at all helpful to Brown. It should be extremely obnoxious to ALL women, no matter what their politics. There are so many really disgusting assumptions here - starting with the idea that "being hot" is the thing that matters - and implying that that requires the help of others - including plastic surgeons. It is the worst of juvenile frat boy mentality.

Not to mention, there is no question of which party's nominee has always used his looks to help him succeed. Did he need plastic surgery - or is that just what women need?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's "border", Mr Fehrnstrom.
Is the part of the brain responsible for logic and spelling damaged in Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC