Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Schoen & Caddell shovel more idiocy in Op-Ed: President Obama should step aside and let Hillary run.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 07:48 PM
Original message
Schoen & Caddell shovel more idiocy in Op-Ed: President Obama should step aside and let Hillary run.
Edited on Sun Nov-20-11 07:49 PM by jefferson_dem
How these two bottom-feeding hacks can show their face in public is beyond me... Seriously, just try to read this tripe and keep from either :spray:ing or :puke:ing.

The Hillary Moment
President Obama can't win by running a constructive campaign, and he won't be able to govern if he does win a second term..

By PATRICK H. CADDELL
AND DOUGLAS E. SCHOEN

When Harry Truman and Lyndon Johnson accepted the reality that they could not effectively govern the nation if they sought re-election to the White House, both men took the moral high ground and decided against running for a new term as president. President Obama is facing a similar reality—and he must reach the same conclusion.

He should abandon his candidacy for re-election in favor of a clear alternative, one capable not only of saving the Democratic Party, but more important, of governing effectively and in a way that preserves the most important of the president's accomplishments. He should step aside for the one candidate who would become, by acclamation, the nominee of the Democratic Party: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Never before has there been such an obvious potential successor—one who has been a loyal and effective member of the president's administration, who has the stature to take on the office, and who is the only leader capable of uniting the country around a bipartisan economic and foreign policy.

Certainly, Mr. Obama could still win re-election in 2012. Even with his all-time low job approval ratings (and even worse ratings on handling the economy) the president could eke out a victory in November. But the kind of campaign required for the president's political survival would make it almost impossible for him to govern—not only during the campaign, but throughout a second term.

Put simply, it seems that the White House has concluded that if the president cannot run on his record, he will need to wage the most negative campaign in history to stand any chance. With his job approval ratings below 45% overall and below 40% on the economy, the president cannot affirmatively make the case that voters are better off now than they were four years ago. He—like everyone else—knows that they are worse off.

<SNIP>

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203611404577041950781477944.html?mod=rss_opinion_main
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
appleannie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. As long as the thugs rule the House, God Himself could not govern or get anything done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. hmmmmm.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hmmm...
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Here
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Here
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Thanks for the link.
Dinner with Barack sounds great.

Although, I'm not sure what that has to do with the subject of your OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Ha...
Click on through the splash to Obama's home page. He's the Democratic nominee in 2012. End of story. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Yes he will be the Dem nominee for 2012
I don't think that was ever in question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Another PUMA flare-up?
The sting of '08 left a persistent rash.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. +1. And it plays itself out here on a regular basis. A lot of the "journalists" are still pissed..
because they told us for a year how "inevitable" Hillary was, and when that turned out to be untrue, they've tried to make this president's tenure a living hell. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
60. Not to mention one of those guys made a small fortune of Clinton in 2008.
Schoen is the same guy from "Penn Schoen & Berland," with Penn being Mark Penn, the walking pair of eyebrows that crashed Hillary's campaign in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Next we hear the old rumors about Larry Sinclair, the Whitey tape and Indonesian madrases.
This is absurd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Consider the source.
And Obama -- like everyone else -- knows were are worse off because it is the Republicans who did everything possible to stop him. And Hillary "EX-DLC-Officer" Clinton would improve things how?

:crazy:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Hillary may keep her campaign promises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. You mean
like passing health care reform with a mandate????
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. What office has Hillary run for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. What do you mean?
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
chowder66 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. More than likely they would allow her to pass a couple of minor
things then they would begin their obstructionist crap all over again. I knew back when all the Pres. Clinton stuff was going on that this was never going to end and was only going to get worse. Boy I wish I had put money on it because it got worse alright.

The republicans thirst for power is all-consuming now. They no longer care about the costs or the harm and they will eat their own as they gain more and more power (overtly or subversively). It's not enough that we have been pointing it out and screaming about the corruption from the top of our lungs. It will take a very scary situation, policy or event to actually wake the rest of this nation up it seems. Unfortunately I don't even know what that would be. It seems enough is out there right now but there are too many people ignoring what is right in front of them. It's as though we all got hit by a bus and most lost their memory of what happened instantly while the rest of us still feel the pain and know where the scars came from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
winstars Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. These Two Fucks...
Edited on Sun Nov-20-11 09:08 PM by winstars
Oh, so taking some time out from Faux News, these two fucks say this bullshit??? This can only mean that the pug's have some unused ammo on Hilary and in the end they think it would be better for THEM, if she were to run. Anything they and others like them 'spurt out' we should do the opposite!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Imho, they make good points. Whether Obama were to step aside or not, I would support a Hillary run.
Edited on Sun Nov-20-11 09:21 PM by Skip Intro

I simply think she would be a more effective leader, producing more tangible results, and would certainly be more skilled at fending off repub attacks and outmaneuvering their schemes.

(And before anyone starts, my sig has only to do with my love of cats. It is a .gif used on DU way, way before 2008, so please, save the "he's a puma" dramatics.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. That would be a truly horrible idea
Truman and Johnson had unpopular wars that their replacements could repudiate (and they lost anyhow). Obama is actually more popular than his policies which Hillary wouldn't repudiate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. Schoen and Cadwell should register to the GOP.
Like Mark Penn, they dont have anything to do with the Democratic Party any more. But it is amazing how some people cannot get that their time has gone.

They are the ones who should step aside and leave the place to other pollsters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. When was the last time either of them were right on anything?
If Hillary wanted to challenge him, she could have and if he prefered to step down, he could have done so early enough to let the people of the Democratic party actually chose a nominee. Is that a novel idea? Had he done this and if Hillary ran and won, that would make her a legitimate nominee. I feel sorry for Hillary that these people continue to push her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
thucythucy Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. Let's see now
Truman was replaced by Eisenhower, who overthrew democratically elected governments from Guatemala to Iran, blocked elections in Vietnam, and vastly accelerated the arms race before warning us--belatedly, in fact in his very last speech as president--about the military industrial complex which he did so much to foster. He also gave us Richard Nixon as vice president....

who then succeeded LBJ, kept us in Vietnam an extra four years, bombed, invaded, and basically destroyed civil life in Cambodia, and over threw the democratically elected government of Chile (and gave us Spiro Agnew as vice president and Reinquist as Supreme Court justice). Then too, there was that little to-do at the Watergate....

Given past results, this really doesn't sound to me like very good advise.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
19. Thanks. We've now heard from Caddell and Schoen
But what does Lee Mercer Jr. think?

"On August 22, 1992, The State of Texas installed an intelligence hotwire in me at
the United States Army Military Intelligence Academy Camp Bullis San Antonio, Texas."


Source: The 6 Most Insane People to Ever Run for President | Cracked.com http://www.cracked.com/article_16748_the-6-most-insane-people-to-ever-run-president_p2.html#ixzz1eIyRyTSy
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
21. Faux's favorite faux Dem. pollsters. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. These idiots were suggesting around this time last year
Edited on Sun Nov-20-11 10:29 PM by Proud Liberal Dem
that President Obama declare that he wouldn't seek a second term a la Johnson because, you know, he's been such a "polarizing" figure :eyes: and that the Republicans would actually work with him and important things would suddenly get done if he decided to refuse to run again.
:eyes: :puke: :banghead: :wtf:

These guys are dirtbags and are NOT true Democrats!

Have these guys ever paid any attention to Republican's negative campaigning and dirty election tactics? Do they even pay attention to all the garbage and filth their employer spews every day about President Obama, his wife, his family, and Democrats in general. If Hilary were POTUS, they'd be doing the exact same thing to her. Mark.my.words. This article is filled with so much warped logic and pretzel twisting of poll numbers that..............:banghead: Stuff like this leaves me speechless and incoherent.

:wtf: guys? Seriously, :wtf:

What kind of drugs are these guys on? Really?

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
64. "What kind of drugs are these guys on? Really?"
Pumalis™

"If you've got a raging erection for a Clinton in the White House for more than five years, see your doctor."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sadbear Donating Member (799 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. The only thing that would accomplish would be to embolden the tea party
They would pull the same shit every time a Democrat were elected President. Caddell and Schoen can go fuck themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
26. stroke, stroke, stroke ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
27. Are there any Republicans out there actually saying
that they'd cooperate with Hillary more than they would Obama? Really? If they think that she'd "cooperate" with the Republicans more then that's even more reason NOT to have her as POTUS as far as I'm concerned. The reality of the matter is that she wouldn't be in office for 5 seconds before they start up the Vince Foster murder conspiracy talk again, drag out the old "Billary" and Chelsea dog jokes and "Obamacare" would suddenly become "Hillarycare", etc. What is extremely galling about these kind of assertions by these guys is that they are basically pulling this stuff out of their butts. Her 69% "approval rating" as SOS (something that has never AFAIK been measured, also has absolutely NO bearing whatsoever on how she would fare as POTUS or even as a candidate for POTUS.

Here's my theory about these two guys: They are Republicans and they want Republicans to win. They, like the rest of the GOP, recognize (privately) that President Obama is going to be a tough candidate to beat next year so they are hoping to figure out some way to get President Obama to withdraw from the race so that they can divide and weaken the Democratic Party (and ticket) enough to have a real shot of winning (good luck with that with their bunch of losers). They would love nothing more than to restart the 2008 slugfest between Obama supporters and Hillary supporters, as well as be able to unload their nuclear arsenal of nastiness and negative campaigning on Hillary in the GE.

This article (like the last one they wrote) is the height of lunacy IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zalinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
30. She seems to have more back bone than Obama
that's worth a vote, in itself. As for Republicans working with her? How is Obama doing? At least she wouldn't start in the middle and then cave in. He doesn't seem to know where the left is.

zalinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
31. Cadell has been off the deep end now for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
32. I figured that this would cause a stir in the hen house.
:popcorn:

You can all relax, she's not interested in the job.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. No, she isn't
and besides Obama won't have any problem being re-elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. You have a crystal ball?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. No, but I look at where Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton were at one time
and can make some comparisons. Obama never has been as bad off as they were against the GOP. I also see recent economic news indicating that Unemployment situation is getting better. If that continues it benefits Obama. I also see the weak GOP field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. The big difference is the economy.
Reagan's economy was improving and Bill had the best economy in over 40 years. Obama won't be so lucky. His reelection will depend on circumstances that are mostly out of his control, such as the unemployment rate and the state of the economy. But a year is a lifetime in politics and anything is possible.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #32
46. I bet Hillary is absolutely embarrassed by these two clowns...
Edited on Mon Nov-21-11 12:55 PM by jefferson_dem
I love the woman ... She has far too much class and intellect for these hangers on...

And you really should replace "not" with "no longer".
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. She may not even be aware of this editorial.
I meant not right now. It's hard to know what one wants so far ahead in time. She may change her mind before 2016. if not, so be it. Her life, her decision.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
34. p.s. They point to Lyndon Johnson and Harry Truman not running again
but the big difference between Obama and LBJ and HST is that they were in trouble with the democratic party (McCarthy nearly beat LBJ in NH and HST actually lost NH to Este Kefauver). On the other hand, Obama has no primary opponent (of stature) and poll after poll shows that he is overwhelmingly the choice of Democrats for renomination--unlike LBJ and HST. So their history is faulty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
35. Are all Hillary fans this unreasonable? They seem to permeate the media with their rot.
I've discovered, since the primaries, it wasn't Hillary that I despised so much as it was her rabid fan club. HillaryIs44 was emblematic of this syndrome. Schoen & Caddell should get over themselves, and realize that folks who "enthusiastically" supported this president's first election, did so for a reason, and opposition to Hillary & the DLC was right up there at the top. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #35
53. No more unreasonable than the Obama fans who see no wrong in the guy.
No matter how bad things are going in the country. In their eyes it's always someone else's fault.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Bite Me!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. Oh, ever so polite and classy.
What a surprise..........

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Your perpetual "victimhood" bullshit has played out, and I have no further patience for it.
Edited on Mon Nov-21-11 01:45 PM by Tarheel_Dem
You were cute in the beginning, because you were so obsessively pro "All Things Clinton", but it's kinda weird now, and unless you're related to them by blood, I suggest you get that checked out. :hi:

Sorry we can't all be as classy as you. Your deleted post the other night was "real class". I'm sure you know the one I'm talking about. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. As a rule I'm not rude to other posters.
What's weird, that I think that Obama is not a particularly good and effective president? That has nothing to do with the Clintons.

Not all of us wish to members of his fan club.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. Shoo fly! I made a promise the other night that I was gonna ignore folks like you.
Edited on Mon Nov-21-11 01:50 PM by Tarheel_Dem
It's obviously the attention you crave. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #59
62. You wish..............
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #35
66. No, plenty of Hillary supporters here aren't tooting this horn.
But there are others, as you well know, who will never, ever get past '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. Exactly. Now that you mention it, I know a couple of them, but they are few & far between.
It's the ones with the microphones and newpaper columns, and their followers, who haven't gotten over it. Poll after poll shows this president's base of support is strong, even stronger than Big Dog's at this stage in his presidency. I know that pisses some people off, but it's grown tiresome, to say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
36. Sigh, way to keep the vitriol going. I was a Hillary supporter
during the primaries. I supported Obama once he was the nominee and still do. I support Hillary too, she's doing a great job and would have made a great president. The rest is water under the bridge and constantily dredging up bruised feelings is pointless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
37. Interesting too
Edited on Mon Nov-21-11 11:59 AM by Proud Liberal Dem
they don't ever seem to call out the Republicans for their role in making it difficult (if not impossible) for President Obama to govern effectively nor do they say anything about the Republicans' nasty smears against President Obama and negative campaigns about Democrats in general. If they want to point out where he might have done things differently, that's one thing but they seem to want to lay ALL of the blame for the difficulty in governing in Washington DC on President Obama and none on the GOP? :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
38. Here's some interesting info on Caddell...
His analysis on polls and campaign issues often puts him at odds with the current leadership of the Democratic Party. He has been criticized for predicting the downfall of the Democratic party.<7><8> Critics point out that he has defended the Bush administration by arguing that Republicans did not exploit the issue of gay marriage in the presidential election of 2004. He also denounced Democrats in the House who voted against the Palm Sunday Compromise, which sought to reinstate Terri Schiavo's feeding tube, as "cold blooded," and called environmentalism "a conspiracy 'to basically deconstruct capitalism.'"<1> Caddell is a regular guest on Fox News Channel, listed as a Fox News Contributor. This has earned him the label of "Fox News Democrat."<1>


Also this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIBzmtD0tYw

Oh, and this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8p55o7f3jI4&feature=related



Dems who play along with this shit should be ashamed of themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
39. I guess they are not going to give up on this
until 2017 or Hillary retires, whichever occurs last.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. "They" who? Neither one of these guys are fans of
Hillary, in fact Caddell threatened to leave the country if she won the election. I'm sure they're happy to drive that wedge though, too bad some on DU choose to take the bait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. You're right, they were not Hillary supporters.
Which makes their disappointment doubly sweet. Ditto for Chris Matthews, he of the tingling leg. He too is down on the dumps over his 2008 choice.

:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #44
51. Are you seriously saying that Doug Schoen (Mark Penn's buddy) is/was not a Hillary supporter?
Edited on Mon Nov-21-11 01:06 PM by jefferson_dem
Caddell is simply a slimy FoxNews' resident "concern troll" posing as a Democratic pollster. No surprise he would glom onto any stupid andt-Democrat narrative of the moment. Neither one has our party's best interest in mind. But you already knew that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. Do think Doug Schoen , a hired Fox News goon, co wrote
that article with good intentions toward Hillary or bad intentions toward democrats? The guy is a proven liar:

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/10/18/347165/breaking-doug-schoen-grossly-misrepresents-his-own-poll-results-to-smear-occupy-wall-street/
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #54
63. The latter.
We agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #51
67. These two are nothing but nutty PUMAS with the same old obsessive agenda.
Edited on Mon Nov-21-11 02:58 PM by CakeGrrl
Or they're just shit-stirrers pushing PUMA buttons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
41. Who are Schoen & Caddell and why should I give a rat's ass what they think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MjolnirTime Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
42. Hillary attracts some real lunatics for some reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. They were not Hillary supporters.
They are just disappointed with Obama.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. They would be just as "disapointed" with Hillary, they're
GOP shills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. If you say so..........
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #42
61. +1
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
65. Looks like this is an annual event for professional trolls, Schoen and Caddell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
68. This was just a desperate attempt by a couple of loser commentators to create a headline.
Its trash journalism at its best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC