Super committee failure sets up $7.1 trillion in deficit reduction

ProSense

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Nov-22-11 07:23 PM
Original message

Super committee failure sets up $7.1 trillion in deficit reduction

CBPP: Why Doing Nothing Would Reduce Deficits by $7.1 Trillion

<...>

<...>

What would happen, however, if Congress did not do any of those things? Deficits would be more than $7.1 trillion lower over the next 10 years, and the budget would be nearly balanced in 2021. The savings from such inaction would be:

$3.3 trillion from letting temporary income and estate tax cuts enacted in 2001, 2003, 2009, and 2010 expire on schedule at the end of 2012 (presuming Congress also lets relief from the Alternative Minimum Tax expire, as noted below);
$0.8 trillion from allowing other temporary tax cuts (the �extenders� that Congress has regularly extended on a �temporary� basis) expire on schedule;
$0.3 trillion from letting cuts in Medicare physician reimbursements scheduled under current law (required under the Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate formula enacted in 1997, but which have been postponed since 2003) take effect;
$0.7 trillion from letting the temporary increase in the exemption amount under the Alternative Minimum Tax expire, thereby returning the exemption to the level in effect in 2001;
$1.2 trillion from letting the sequestration of spending required if the Joint Committee does not produce $1.2 trillion in deficit reduction take effect; and
$0.9 trillion in lower interest payments on the debt as a result of the deficit reduction achieved from not extending these current policies.

If Republicans are serious about deficit reduction, they should sign on immediately.

Refresh | +8 Recommendations

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

TheWraith

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Nov-22-11 07:32 PM
Response to Original message

1. While I agree, comparing $7.1 trillion and $1.4 trillion isn't quite accurate.

That $7.1 trillion number includes things which are slated to expire, such as the Bush tax cuts, which were part of the OMB projection which served as the 'floor" to that $1.4 trillion figure. In other words, it's really $7.1 trillion without a deal versus about $5.5 trillion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

ProSense

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Nov-22-11 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #1

4. True

Edited on Tue Nov-22-11 09:16 PM by ProSense

While I agree, comparing $7.1 trillion and $1.4 trillion isn't quite accurate.
That $7.1 trillion number includes things which are slated to expire, such as the Bush tax cuts, which were part of the OMB projection which served as the 'floor" to that $1.4 trillion figure. In other words, it's really $7.1 trillion without a deal versus about $5.5 trillion.

...because the expiration of the tax cuts weren't compromised away.

As long as that remains the case, it's a total $7.1 trillion.

That's the number to Republican try to avoid.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

teddy51

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Nov-22-11 07:34 PM
Response to Original message

2. "If Republicans are serious about deficit reduction", except we know that

they never have been. They went along with the Bush/Cheney expenditures, and never questioned them. They don't give a crap about cutting deficits, they just want Obama to fail.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

high density

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Nov-22-11 07:54 PM
Response to Original message

3. Don't worry, the GOP will continue finding ways to redistribute more money upward

before this takes effect.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:00 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.