ALL OF THESE BREAKING NEWS STORIES WERE ORIGINALLY POSTED IN THE BREAKING NEWS FORUM.
And then moved to sub-forums were only a tiny fraction of DU's members could see any of them. I call that censorship.
http://www.tucsonsentinel.com/nationworld/report/090711_obama_rendition/cia-rendition-flights-continue-under-obama/http://www.truth-out.org/insider-tells-why-obama-chose-not-prosecute-torture/1315419328http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=237199 The rendition news story was inappropriately moved to the Presidential sub-forum.
The torture news story, which had NOTHING to do with 9-11, was curiously moved to the 9-11 sub-forum. When I re-posted it as a breaking news story, this morning, it was promptly deleted as "untimely."
The Palestine story dealt directly with US policy, and, per DU's Breaking News "rules" met the criteria as a post for the breaking news forum.
There's some serious bullshit going on. It all adds up to me that someone at DU doesn't want the President news articles which could harm the President's reputation posted, even when the criticism could be justified and warrented.