Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So it took ten years to find him?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 02:12 AM
Original message
So it took ten years to find him?
I don't see why this is such a great and astonishing achievement. We have the most ridiculous military budget every year that runs into hundreds billions, we have spy satellites roaming the earth constantly, we have the most sophisticated military hardware and intelligence gathering machine, and we couldn't find this guy, the number one terrorist, for ten years.

Sorry but I don't see how this is some great victory. We should have got him a loooong time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. it's a good question -- I wish the inevitable unrec wasn't so predictably sad
...and telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. On the other hand, it took Obama 2 years to do what Bush could not in 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. Technically, it only really took two...
Because we all know Bush wasn't looking for him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. You have to consider the possibility that we weren't looking all that hard for several yrs
Bush pronounced himself uninterested in OBL's whereabouts just a few months after deposing the Taliban, and just before turning his laser-like incompetence towards Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. More like 2.4 years....well, they had to get their sea-legs.
and stop the economic collapse first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. There was no competence in the White House for 8 of those years.
So it really took two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rabs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. Actually it was more than 10 years




Bill Clinton tried to kill OBL on Aug. 20, 1998 when he ordered cruise missiles fired at a compound near Khost, Afghanistan. OBL was not there. The same day cruise missiles struck a pharma plant linked to OBL in Khartoum, Sudan.

Clinton had been trying to off OBL since 1996, after al Qaida was connected to the first World Trade Center attack in 1993.

------- snips -----------

Within those boundaries, there was much more to the war than has reached the public record. Beginning on Aug. 7, 1998, the day that al Qaeda destroyed the U.S. embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, Clinton directed a campaign of increasing scope and lethality against bin Laden's network that carried through his final days in office.

Within days of the August 1998 embassy bombings, the combined efforts of the FBI, CIA and National Security Agency pinned responsibility on bin Laden's organization.

With only Attorney General Janet Reno dissenting, Clinton directed two retaliatory strikes on Aug. 20. One, near the Afghan town of Khost, was timed to kill bin Laden and his associates in their beds at 10 p.m. local time. It missed, the CIA said afterward, by a few hours. The other demolished a pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, Sudan, that the CIA had linked to attempted production of chemical weapons for bin Laden.

Domestically and globally, Clinton National Security Council staffers Daniel Benjamin and Steven Simon lamented recently, the missile attack came to be regarded -- wrongly, they argued -- "as the greatest foreign policy blunder of the Clinton presidency." Apart from the "public relations battering," Paul R. Pillar, the CIA's deputy counterterrorism chief at the time, wrote later, the episode inflicted a "broader blow . . . on the perceived integrity of U.S. intelligence and U.S. counterterrorist efforts generally."

From Washington Post, Wednesday, December 19, 2001, longish article but interesting.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A62725-2001Dec18




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. Remember, Bush wasn't "that concerned" about him way back in 2002
From a March 13, 2002, press conference:

Q: But don't you believe that the threat that bin Laden posed won't truly be eliminated until he is found either dead or alive?

BUSH: Well, as I say, we haven't heard much from him. And I wouldn't necessarily say he's at the center of any command structure. And, again, I don't know where he is. I -- I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him.


source: http://mediamatters.org/research/200410140007
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. It SHOULD'VE been long ago but Bush didn't really look so
it only took 2years. Bush never made a serious effort it suited him to keep OBL alive and a boogeyman to scare Americans with and take away our rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReturnoftheDjedi Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. it's a victory because we should have found him long ago. but we found him yesterday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. yeah, he's been living there apparently since 2005, we have spy planes & spy satellites
& an international network of spies & informers, we spend billions, but we just couldn't find him, he's too smart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. Bush didn't try very hard. He pulled most of the troops out of Afghanistan
in order to fight the war in Iraq.

Afterwards, he was quoted as saying Bin Laden wasn't important anymore. He felt Bin Laden had been contained.

When Obama won, he promised to wind down the Iraq war but to put more troops into Afghanistan to get Bin Laden. And that's what he did. At some point Bin Laden moved into Pakistan, but Obama was determined to get him wherever he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
13. There is something
Edited on Mon May-02-11 03:34 AM by fujiyama
sad and pathetic when it takes over a trillion dollars (the size of many countries' entire GDP!) and thousands of lives to find ONE tall bearded man, especially when it was fairly well known which region he was hiding out in.

Then again, I gotta figure if that much money is being spent with no results, either someone is purposely not doing their job (likely in the case of 8 years prior to Obama), or it is a matter of criminally gross incompetence and negligence. I think we finally had the focus on this in recent years that it deserved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
14. Nope! It took 2 years.
Bush was never serious about finding him, he just used it as an excuse to invade Iraq. He pretty much admitted it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
15. i don't think they were looking for him for the first 8 years
at least not seriously. see tora bora and maybe they didn't want him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC