Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Leads Developed World…in Income Inequality

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 07:27 AM
Original message
U.S. Leads Developed World…in Income Inequality
U.S. Leads Developed World…in Income Inequality

When determining how wealthy a country is, there’s more to it than simply measuring the size of its economy. A nation can have an enormous gross domestic product (GDP), which is used to classify the top developed states in the world, but if much of the economic wealth is concentrated in a few hands, leaving the rest of the population struggling, is it fair to say the country is truly rich?

Which brings us to the United States.

Long considered a leader among developed societies, the U.S. ranks at the bottom in terms of income inequality when compared to its wealthy colleagues, according to the Gini coefficient, which has been used to measure income inequality since 1912. Sweden (23) and Norway (25) lead the way with low income inequality rates, meaning their gaps between rich and poor are smaller than everywhere else.

The U.S. has a rating of 46.8, putting it in the same company as developing countries like Rwanda and Nepal.

http://www.allgov.com/US_and_the_World/ViewNews/US_Leads_Developed_World__in_Income_Inequality_110504
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. This place surely looks developed to me...


And I suspect folks in Chile, Panama, Hong Kong and Argentina would take umbrage at being implicitly called undeveloped too to name but a few.

Sure looks like another in the "ranks first/last in a group of countries we picked to make sure it ranked first/last" series....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Way to intentionally miss the point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. way to intentionally pretend there was a point to miss. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. That means we're # 1! :sarcasm: mucho :sarcasm: nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. The PTB's solution is obvious: Outlaw the Gini Coefficient. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC