Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ill. may order backseat passengers to buckle up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 11:38 AM
Original message
Ill. may order backseat passengers to buckle up
Ill. may order backseat passengers to buckle up

SPRINGFIELD, Ill.—
Illinois vehicle passengers -- whether in the back or front seats -- may soon have to strap in under legislation requiring everyone to wear seatbelts, regardless of age.

Legislation tightening the state's seat belt law has been approved by the Illinois House. It now goes to the Senate, where President John Cullerton has often backed traffic-safety measures.

Currently, safety belts are required for backseat passengers only if they're 19 or younger. The House bill that passed 61-55 on Thursday would require belts for everyone with a few exceptions, such as passengers in cabs.

Supporters call it common-sense safety legislation. Opponents say there's little evidence of a serious problem with backseat passengers being killed or injured because they weren't using seat belts.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-il-xgr-backseatbelts,0,3097678.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. I was under the impression that this was already the law.
Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. In Ca., it's been the law for many years, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. They do that already in my family.
The car does not move unless everyone is wearing a seat belt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Back in my idiotic libertarian youth, I used to oppose seat belt laws for adults.
I'd pontificate about how adults should have the right to risk their lives if they want to, blah blah blah. And then I met and became best friends with a man who was an EMT. For three years I watched him suffer nightmares, stomach ulcers, anxiety attacks, and even PTSD flashbacks because of the horror-gore he witnessed every day while responding to the scene of car accidents. He wasn't the only EMT to suffer these problems, either--it was pretty common. He finally, finally got a couple of promotions and became a county emergency manager, but even now, he still has nightmares.

Seeing the mangled remains of human bodies, hearing the cries of agony and trying to comfort and treat the victim while waiting for the fire truck to bring the Jaws of Life, constantly being the person to whom someone's last, pain-filled words are entrusted...that can traumatize ANYONE. Even professionals who see it every day.

So I thought about it again, and I decided that my right to risk being horrifically injured in a car crash is NOT more important than the rights of the EMTs who come save all our lives to be able to sleep at night without nightmares and to be able to get through the day without PTSD flashbacks of my innards all over the pavement.

When you consider it this way, opposing seatbelt laws is a selfish and cruel thing to do. Even if you don't give a damn about yourself, at least consider that some innocent person is going to have to be the one to clean your body parts up. Considering how much our EMTs and emergency responders sacrifice already for all of us, why on earth would anyone DELIBERATELY make their jobs even more emotionally difficult than they already are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. My instincts are also libertarian. But I realized that you need to take into account
that many people are stupid. And terrible at doing rational risk assessment. Anyone who worries in the slightest about dying in an airplane crash, or getting cancer from a cellphone, who does not fasten their seatbelt (in the front or in the back) is a complete idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modern_Matthew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. And I've known EMTs that are desensitized to such things...
Edited on Sun May-08-11 02:26 PM by Modern_Matthew
Not really a valid argument for forcing people to do something. We can't go around legislating against one for the potential that someone else may be affected. You'll end up with a clusterfuck.

I'm libertarian in just about everything except the economy, health care, and education. If you're not in business or abusing your kids or other people, the government should leave you alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. The purpose of these laws is revenue collection, plain and simple.
Public safety, the sensibilities of EMTs, all secondary to issuing tickets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not the law here in Georgia, but it should be. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC