Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh Noes! Teh People's Republic of Vermont gonna infect us wit Canadianism!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Keith Bee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 02:14 PM
Original message
Oh Noes! Teh People's Republic of Vermont gonna infect us wit Canadianism!
The people who want America to adopt a single-payer health care system like to tell a story. It's about how universal care had a demo in one of Canada's less populous provinces, where it proved so popular and successful that the rest of the country couldn't help but copy it. "Saskatchewan was the first province in Canada to get universal health care," said Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., outside Capitol Hill on Tuesday. "The most beloved Canadian is Tommy Douglas, who started it."

In the early 1960s, under Premier Tommy Douglas, the rural Canadian province introduced something like Medicare that covered everyone. Panic and protests ensued. The province had to import doctors temporarily to cover for the ones who'd gone on strike. But the plan worked. It was popular. By the end of the decade, all of Canada had the plan. And in 2004 Douglas was named the "greatest Canadian" in a poll, surging past Wayne Gretzky, Pierre Trudeau, and the bassist from The Tragically Hip. So that part's not hyperbole, either.

McDermott was telling this story partly to explain why he hadn't just wasted his time. He and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., had just rolled out the latest version of their single-payer plan, the American Health Security Act (PDF). There was not much media present; there were no other members of Congress. Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., cast a quizzical look at the event as he passed by walking his dog. The first question to McDermott and Sanders was about why they thought they could pass single-payer health care in 2011 when it couldn't win enough votes even when Democrats controlled both houses of Congress in the last session.

The answer: They didn't. But the state of Vermont will. On May 26, Gov. Peter Shumlin of Vermont is expected to sign legislation that will create universal coverage in the state—eventually. Vermont will use subsidies from the Affordable Care Act to help create a Canada-style system. And its system, or so the theory goes, will become so popular and cheap that the rest of America will want to copy it.

http://www.slate.com/id/2293634/pagenum/all/#p2

But, but what about the Death Panties? Urm, I mean, Death Pornos? Shit, uh...well Sarah Said it was Death SOMETHING!!!

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. On a related note, did you know that Tommy was Kiefer Sutherland's grampa?


Funny, that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErikJ Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bernie Sanders will be our Tommy Douglas the #1 Canadian hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlimJimmy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. So, in other words, they're going to use federal dollars to fund
a state program? That's not a very wise decision in my opinion. Let it stand or fall on its own merit - and funding.

Vermont will use subsidies from the Affordable Care Act to help create a Canada-style system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It must really really hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlimJimmy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. No, it was a legitimate question. If you want to blow it off with some snarky answer, so be it.
I'll wait for a reasoned response so we can have a discussion concerning the funding for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Keith Bee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. What would REALLY be snarky.....
...is the GOP House refusing to fund the Affordable Care Act, thus aborting Vermont's attempt at using federal dollars to put single-payer to the test.

But maybe you'd like that, Mr Cigna.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlimJimmy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. And why exactly should *any* state use new federal dollars to put
something to the test? As the other poster said, they could and should take the 1 billion in yearly Medicaid funding and use that to develop the program - Ms. Snark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. The poster has a point. Federal dollars can be killed by republicans.
Do you really want that possibility hanging over Vermont as that state makes a long delayed attempt to truly attack excessive health care costs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. They are merely using those funds to create the program not to fund
it. Or at least that is the way I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. That's a traditional thing. Instead of funding a
regular Medicaid type program, they use the federal Medicaid dollars to do single payer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlimJimmy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Okay, I can accept that answer since we are providing those dollars to the state
Edited on Thu May-12-11 05:01 PM by SlimJimmy
already. Thanks for clearing that up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. TennCare did something like that in the 90s
Edited on Thu May-12-11 06:25 PM by socialist_n_TN
It worked pretty well (as I recall) until the Republicans got control of it and shredded it.

Also, I believe the money for this, as another poster said, is just for the set up costs of the system. There'll probably be some other costs involved statewide (taxes), but remember this money SHOULD come from businesses and people NOT having to buy private health insurance.

Just off the top of my head, Medicare, which is NOT single payer, only has something like 4% overhead whereas private health insurance cost consumers nearly 30% in overhead AND profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlimJimmy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. The cost of medicaid in Vermont last year was about 1 billion. I wonder
if the start up costs will come in under that? With that said, I wish them the best with the plan. Most states that have tried similar plans have discovered that the costs out pace the estimates, and they start to get into trouble after a few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. That's what single payer will do. Any money a state gets for healthcare
Edited on Fri May-13-11 05:08 AM by mmonk
is all pooled together for one system. Medicare, Medicaid etc. all goes to one system in that state, not different systems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlimJimmy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. I don't have a problem with that. What I didn't want to see was *new* federal dollars being spent
to cover the start up costs for this program.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. May 26th?
Is this some joke? Aren't we all supposed to gone May 21st? How will we ever know if it works. Damn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. I brought the infection to Brazil!
In the form of a bottle of maple syrup.

And it is DELICIOUS. :9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QED Donating Member (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. Can't be all bad, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'll save the congratulations for when we see what Vermont actually ends up with.
Dont forget America's 13th largest city has universal healthcare, san francisco.
IT has not caught on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. Way to go Vermont. With the Canadian system there is no fear of becoming bankrupt because of your
Health.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. Go Vermont! One province at a time, one state at a time.
That's how Canada adopted universal health care across the country.

That's how Canada legalized same-sex marriage across the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
21. It can't happen soon enough. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
22. hope this will start this necessary change n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
25. Just one more reason to move there
Looking at 4 more properties this weekend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC