Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House GOP moves to end money for new body scanners

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 04:59 PM
Original message
House GOP moves to end money for new body scanners
(05-12) 14:04 PDT WASHINGTON, (AP) -- House Republicans controlling the Transportation Security Administration's purse strings are moving to cut off new money for those advanced airport scanners that have sparked outrage over their revealing images of travelers' bodies.

Draft legislation released by the Appropriations homeland security subcommittee denies the Obama administration's $76 million request for an additional 275 scanners, which many travelers dislike because TSA personnel can view full body images of travelers.

Rep. Robert Aderholt said his move was sparked more by budgetary factors than protests from privacy advocates. It wouldn't affect the 500 machines already in place at the nation's 450 airports — or the 500 recently funded.

The House voted last year to cut off money for the machines, but the administration and the Senate refused to go along.

Source: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/05/12/national/w140423D24.DTL#ixzz1MB66vw00
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Every so often...
the Republican train wreck derails something that really does need to fall down a canyon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Uh-oh! Bad news for Michael Chertoff and the investors at Rapiscan!
Now they'll have to get real jobs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wounded Bear Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Probably couldn't afford the rates to upload the images to the internets...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good. Maybe the Republicans can save us from the Democrats this time.
The Obama Administration wants to spend more millions on invasive, anti-privacy, unnecessary, police-state technology. The GOP -- usually at the forefront of police-state tactics -- opposes that because they oppose Obama.

Good.

Now, if only the GOP could slow down Obama's ongoing Drug War for the same reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. 'House GOP is soft on terrorism!'
You know that's what they'd be saying if the roles were reversed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, that $76M will help pay for bailouts and tax breaks.
Yes, it's that cynical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. A stopped clock is right twice a day...
Let them have this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. Good,
although sort of sick-making that they have to clarify it is not for privacy reasons.

SOMEONE needs to stop them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. We all don't need more radiation exposure.
They should reduce the number for x-rays too. In fact, they shouldn't allow dentists to make it mandatory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC