Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FCC/Comcast whore addresses her quitting the FCC and joining Comcast

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:48 AM
Original message
FCC/Comcast whore addresses her quitting the FCC and joining Comcast
You can read her letter here.



http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306569A1.pdf


And YES SHE'S A WHORE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have called her that also a couple of times on DU already
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DontTreadOnMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is the most obvious conflict of interest I have ever seen
And not one comment from all the other congress critters.

They are ALL bought and sold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Don't insult whores. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. I agree. At least prostitutes do an honest days work. Unbelievable this was allowed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. This should warrant further action by congress, if not justice...
...it's too late to do anything now other then to try and force comcrap to fire her weasel ass, but I doubt that congress or the JustAss dept has the will or the desire to force any 'change' to take place...

I think this is a warning sign that the plutocrats/corporations are now feeling so safe in their dominance that they just aren't that worried about displaying their own corruption anymore...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. How true! How I miss my old USA. Back
when at least the shennagins were covered up better. The House and Senate have become just a gathering place for wannabe rich honchos. We actually know nothing that is happening. Our television media gives us a Democrat for about 5 minutes on air; about 15 minutes for a Republican and afterward we still do not know what either said. In the meantime we get coverage for people like Sarah Palin and Donald Trump. As if they had anything worthwhile to say. We have already gone so far downhill there may be no turning back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. No. Whoring is an honest trade. What she is is a traitor.
She took our money to do a job and betrayed us by not doing it. Whores take money and do the job, however distasteful. She's a criminal. She's a traitor. She is nothing as honest as a whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Good point. She doesn't have the honor of a whore. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. Free Press now hosts an online petition
Free Press now hosts an online petition which holds Baker and the Comcast-NBC merger to task for their possible ethical violation.

Directed toward Rep. Darrell Issa, chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, the petition reads:

Even the appearance of corruption erodes the American people's confidence in the government, and Commissioner Baker's departure for Comcast highlights the problem of the revolving door between government and industry in Washington.

As chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, you pledged to investigate outside influence that would constitute a "serious breach of the independent proceedings of the FCC." I urge you to promptly investigate Commissioner Baker's seemingly blatant conflict of interest.


http://act2.freepress.net/sign/baker_comcast/?akid=2506.9254347.28XCnX&rd=1&t=3


In light of Baker's new job, should be interesting to see where another FCC member will soon end up on AT&T's staff.


http://www.minyanville.com/dailyfeed/fcc-placates-us-before-it/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrendaBrick Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Thanks for link on petition! Signed. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:14 AM
Original message
She's a republican. No further explanation needed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
17. Yup.



My only question would be given her party affiliation why did she wait so long? :shrug:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. She Can Put Out 1000 Press Releases
She voted for the merger.
Recusing herself now is laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. She's The Daughter Of James Baker
Born witha silver spoon in her mouth. A child of privilidge whose gravy train just arrived. No scrupples...but then which legacy does?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Boy, Does That Explain A Lot, Huh?
Another silverspoon thinking they're entitled to success and wealth because their parents had it.

No wonder she thinks nothing of it. She thinks the world owes her this stuff.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Daddy didn't have any scruples to give her.
Scruples can be learned, but it is a difficult subject and not highly rewarded in our society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. The brains behind the stolen Y2K Florida selection.



Now I get it. The pieces of the puzzle are all coming together now.

Thanks for the info.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hotler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. She is a cleaner just like her dad.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. Obama Sure Goes Out of His Way to Please
Edited on Fri May-13-11 02:59 PM by otohara
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. james *addison* baker? explains a lot, thanks. Part of the Farish et al mafia dynasty
Edited on Fri May-13-11 03:03 PM by Hannah Bell
JAMES ADDISON BAKER (1821)

Great-grandfather to James Baker III's ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_A._Bake...

He figured prominently in the Rice murder case as partner in Rice's legal firm, Gray & Botts, later Baker-Botts, which Baker III currently heads.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Addison...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baker_Botts

Adelaide Lovett, daughter of the first President of Rice University, EO Lovett (U of Virginia & U of Leipzig), married a son of Captain James A Baker, Walter Brown "W" Baker, banker.

He was named for the founder of Baker-Botts.

Adelaide's brother Henry was a Baker-Botts partner along with the present James A Baker III's father.

All of them Rice U. trustees.

Robert Scott Lovett, a relation, first worked for Baker-Botts, then left to work for EH Harriman's Union Pacific interests, eventually UP President.

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Hannah%20Bell/58


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. She is his daughter in law, not his daughter
She is married to his son. I have no idea whether her parents were, or were not, affluent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Correction Is Noted...
I saw the information in a broadcast industry newsletter who brought up the relationship. Looking at her bio, she's too young to be a daughter (Graduated college in 1990) but appears to have done work for Baker's law firm. Her appointment is one of two by the GOTB party leadership. I've seen her at some televised commission hearings...very perky and likeable and surely will use this and her contacts to make a nice stash of cash. Connections inside the beltway can get you a long way.

Thank you for the correction...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. She actually is a very bright and pleasant person. Not an idealogue
On the other hand, the decision by Comcast to offer her a job straight out of the FCC and her decision to take it is unprecedented to my knowledge. Most FCC Commissioners don't go directly from the agency to a new job, but take some time off or go to something like the Aspen Institute for a bit of a "cooling off" period. It smacks of arrogance on the part of Comcast/NBCU to make such a move. I truly don't believe that there was any quid pro quo or that she was contacted about the job until after the merger was approved. I personally know a lot of the folks involved and its just not who they are. But, as I said, its unprecedented and it creates a horrible appearance of conflice (if not actual conflict) issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Her Vote Wasn't In Question...
The Commission is in Democratic hands and thus the approval of the merger was based on winning one if not more Democratic votes...which was the case (and with the approval of the administration). The point of her jumping so quickly (similar to what Billy Tauzin did...went straight to K Street after his years in Congress and pushing Telcom '96 through...but he's a Congresscritter) is the eye-opener here. As you rightly note, the "proper" thing to do is to have a cooling period of a year or two in some think-tank or private law practice and then ease into a lobbying gig. The coziness between the regultors and regulated in the communications area has turned our "public airwaves" into private plantations.

Cheers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. If it smells like dead mackerel in the moonlight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
15. Says she recused herself on all Comcast matters as of April 18. The VOTE was in January.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. Second paragraph...
"Not once in my entire tenure as a Commissioner had anyone at Comcast or NBCUniversal
approached me about potential employment."


Not once? Really?

My question is, How did she find out about the opening then? Did her Fairy God-Mother wave her wand?

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. So, she sought them out after she did them a favor? Even worse.
That, or someone from the merged NBComcast approached her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. But She Recused Herself
after they "didn't" approach her?????

I hope she chokes on her ill gotten money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. So, Business HATES government? Does ANYONE think this is a good thing?
I don't get it. I mean, if government is "out to get" business, gets in the way, etc. shouldn't Comcast HATE this woman?

Shouldn't Comcast have such blind hatred for her they'd be following her around to make sure no one in the industry gives her a job?

The kind of people *I* want in government are people who businesses like Comcast HATE. "Oh no, it's HER again! I will *destroy* that woman for all the trouble she's been!!!"

THAT'S what *I* want...

Instead, they love her so much they give her a JOB?

Then... who represents ME in the FCC?

/rambling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC