Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

VIDEO: Matt Taibbi & Atlantic Monthly's "Wall Street apologist" Megan McArdle square off

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 03:06 PM
Original message
VIDEO: Matt Taibbi & Atlantic Monthly's "Wall Street apologist" Megan McArdle square off
May 15, 2011 04:30 AM
Matt Taibbi and Megan McArdle Square Off Over Potential Criminal Charges Against Goldman Sachs

By Heather



http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/matt-taibbi-and-megan-mcardle-square-over-off

Matt Taibbi has a new article on Rolling Stone on the recent hearings in the U.S. Senate and whether or not Goldman Sachs executives should be facing criminal trials or not in the wake of ongoing investigations into their part in the financial meltdown we went through a few years ago. CNN decided to bring in the Atlantic Monthly's Wall Street apologist Megan McArdle to debate Taibbi on Your Money.

I'm no financial expert and a lot of this stuff is over my head, but McArdle's arguments to me here seemed to be that all of these laws are just too terribly difficult to understand, therefore it's too difficult to figure out if they did anything wrong and to prosecute them, but the people they were selling these toxic assets to should have known better and understood what they were buying. Looks like a classic case of blame the victim to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. "complexity is the new opacity" -- or, no crime if i can't understand it.
while blaming the victim for not understanding an offering memo, she's also saying that you can't prosecute people b/c their crimes are too damn difficult to understand. so, which is it??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Locrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. right
her argument is basically - "it's complicated, money = good, fuck you".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. McArdle is lying piece of shit!
I would not be surprised at all if Goldman has a slush fund to pay off "journalists" like her to fight their battles.

Her offerings are bullshit. Ezra Klein and a few others have posted articles about McArdle's less than honest work. The Atlantic should be ashamed to have her blog for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC