Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brown unveils plan to close 70 California parks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 04:38 AM
Original message
Brown unveils plan to close 70 California parks
SAN JOSE, Calif -- SAN JOSE, Calif. - Seventy of California's 278 state parks will be closed under a plan announced Friday by Gov. Jerry Brown's administration, a historic blow to the state's storied natural heritage that may actually get worse as lawmakers scramble to fix the budget crisis.

Although state parks officials initially said Friday the padlocks would go up starting in September, they revised that later in the day, saying instead none would close until July 1, 2012.

The list includes a significant number of Northern California parks, including Henry W. Coe State Park near Morgan Hill; Castle Rock and Twin Lakes State Beach in Santa Cruz County; Portola Redwoods in San Mateo County; Moss Landing State Beach and Limekiln State Park in Big Sur; and Samuel P. Taylor State Park in Marin County.

"We were working night and day to keep this day from coming. Nobody wanted to have to do this," said state Natural Resources Secretary John Laird.


<snip>


Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2011/05/13/3625704/brown-unveils-plan-to-close-70.html#ixzz1MVSx1WBW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. This
is a travesty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. just awful. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. How can a state park be effectively closed/locked up?
It's not like parks or portions thereof which are closed during the winter months, and you just stretch a chain across the main entry. You can put barricades across main entries, but you still have to maintain at least some fire roads/access in case of forest fires. Anyone with an ATV or any kind of off road/4 wheel drive capacity vehicle can get in. The boundaries of state parks are like the "border" with Canada - porous as hell.

Hunters, fishermen, people looking for someplace to party/drink/do drugs - now have a place with no game wardens, no park police, etc. The state will save some funds but still have to pay to patrol and monitor these parks.

It's really a shame that states are forced into such cost cutting actions. And with the downward spiral of the American economy, i.e., the concentration of wealth in the top few percent, and the steadily worsening standard of living for the majority of American workers, I can't see California being able to re-open these parks in the foreseeable future. Unlike highways, streets, fire and ambulance service, health care, etc., parklands are luxuries. Parklands are what the uber wealthy surround their estates with, to isolate them from us great unwashed masses.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwareOne Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Just watch, they will soon be sold to developers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I was going to ask about that. Will the State sell mineral and lumber rights to
Edited on Mon May-16-11 06:39 AM by no_hypocrisy
corporations for the property while locking out the public?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Pennsylvania's GOP Governor has already opened state lands to fracking
This does not bode well for game trails, water quality of streams, ponds, etc., not to mention the roads necessary to haul in millions of gallons of water& toxic chemicals in huge tank trucks. If the poisoned water and toxic fumes from fracking does not kill the wildlife first, the noise of thousands of trucks will scare them away. Give it a year or two and the states' sportsmen will start finding interesting oddities - two headed rabbits and deer with three eyes? Why not? Between several hundred kinds of toxic chemicals and radiation found in fracking waste water, it will be a veritable freak show. As the song goes, "If you go out in the woods today, you're sure of a big surprise!"

Apparently the majority of deer hunters & other outdoors persons in the state are clueless as to how fracking for natural gas on state lands will affect them. Most of these - especially in central PA, are lifelong republicans. The cognitive dissonance of their GOP governor selling out to the oil/gas industry, and the destruction of Pennsylvania's woodlands & their outdoor activities will blow their tiny GOP brains.

Then there's the Cub Scouts on their weekend camping trips. Good times? Not any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I live in PA. I would bet A LOT OF MONEY those hunters VOTED for Corbett, as you suggest.
Edited on Mon May-16-11 07:18 AM by WinkyDink
GUNS. GUNS. That's their big dumb issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Hunters who are crappy shots & vast network of natural gas pipelines in the woods?
Shale drilling: Not a single well goes into production without a network of pipelines to take the gas to market.

Here's an interesting recipe for disaster:
Start with thousands of Pennsylvania deer hunters. These guys - at least the ones I know - go hunting once a year, for "their" deer. They aren't practicing their marksmanship every week at a shooting range. They stock up with lots of beer and booze for their hunting trip. Not exactly sniper-quality shooters.

Put these hunters in off-road vehicles/ATVs, careening through the woods.

Add in thousands of gas wells in the woods.

Connect these wells via thousands of pipelines to collection points.

Are the pipelines painted bright orange and cleared of brush/trees on either side? Don't think so. And there's no federal regulation of pipelines unless they are interstate. So no regulation in the PA. woods.

One or two nasty accidents/explosions and the all powerful shale drillers will get Governor Corbett, the Frackers' Friend, to make a lot of state owned land unavailable for hunting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Don't parks bring in revenue?
Maybe not much from the parks, but from local businesses, restaurants, gas stations, etc? California's parks are a big attraction for the state.

This seems like the wrong thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Apparently not enough to maintain themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC