Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wahpeton police officer suspended for arresting teen with lack of probable cause

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 03:10 PM
Original message
Wahpeton police officer suspended for arresting teen with lack of probable cause
Wahpeton police officer suspended for arresting teen with lack of probable cause

WAHPETON, N.D. – A police officer here has been suspended for five days without pay and must take 40 hours of remedial law enforcement training as punishment for arresting a juvenile with a lack of probable cause – an incident the teenager recorded and posted as a YouTube video that went viral.

Police Chief Scott Thorsteinson announced the disciplinary action against Officer Dustin Hill in a news release dated Monday.

Hill arrested 17-year-old Robert Wanek of Breckenridge, Minn., on May 6 outside the Richland-Wahpeton Law Enforcement Center for interfering with a police investigation.

“Although later determined to have been made with insufficient probable cause, Officer Hill’s arrest in this case was made in good faith and without malice,” Thorsteinson wrote.

http://www.inforum.com/event/article/id/320060/group/homepage/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good. This shit needs to be cracked down on.
The police need to be held to a very high standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And states like Massachusetts and Maryland need to drop the anti-filming laws ...
You can be arrested and put in jail for doing it. Ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That too. It's absurd and authoritarian.
It also encourages abuse because it promotes the idea that the police are special, and not to be held accountable for their actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. What would the outcome have been without the videotape?
This week, I've been treated to the opinions of DUers who think that the remedy for illegal police entry into your home is the exclusion of evidence and a tort claim that could take years to resolve in the iffy atmosphere of our legal system. But who decides what's an illegal entry? And what is that based on? Are you prepared to videotape every knock at your door (or have a camera that goes on automatically should a SWAT team decide your house or apartment is their target)? Would young Mr. Wanek have prevailed on his false arrest claim without the videotape evidence? Notice how the chief continues to excuse his officer's conduct as being done "in good faith and without malice." Of course, Chief Thorsteinson wasn't the one being arrested, so his generous assessment of his officer's conduct may be colored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. So true, no video and cop walks and kid is charged with a bogus crime! n-t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. This needs a kick. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC