Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

India aims to build the world's fastest supercomputer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Vehl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 11:43 AM
Original message
India aims to build the world's fastest supercomputer


India this week committed Rs 10,000 crore ( 2.5 Billion$ ) to indigenously develop the world’s fastest supercomputer by 2017. The Planning Commission agreed in principle to provide the funds to the Indian Space Research Organsiation (ISRO) and Indian Institute of Science (IIS), Bangalore to develop a supercomputer with a performance of 132.8 exaflops (132 quintillion floating operations per second). A quintillion has 18 zeros (a million has six).

The world’s fastest supercomputer right now is a Chinese one, which can do 2.7 petaflops, or two quadrillion flops. A quadrillion has 15 zeros. India in 2007 had the world’s fourth fastest indigenously-developed supercomputer with a performance of 172.5 teraflops (172 trillion flops), which has been enhanced this month to 220 teraflops. That’s still a level lower than China’s supercomputer.

The Indian supercomputer will not be used only for enhancing the country’s space abilities, it will also be used to predict monsoon and precise weather inputs to boost agriculture N Balakrishnan, associate professor at IIS-Bangalore, said the target being set is “ambitious” while referring to achieving the exaflop – or next level of computing performance -- by 2017. “We have planned everything minutely.” “We have agreed to provide R10,000 crore for having ‘exa’ level of supercomputing facility,” minister of state for planning Ashwini Kumar told HT.

more here
http://www.hindustantimes.com/Rs-10-000-crore-push-for-India-s-supercomp-plan/Article1-703189.aspx



I half expected this news from India as soon as I heard about China's Tianhe-1 becoming the world's fastest supercomputer last year. However I am rather surprised by the very high aim set for this one.

132 exaflop will be 50000 times more powerful than Tianhe. Furthermore the top 500 supercomputers in the world add up to only 32.4 petaflops.In 2010 Cray inc predicted that 1 exaflop might be possible by 2020, if India is able to do not just 1, but a 132 exaflop by 2017, as they claim...it would be a huge achievement.

On a related note, its assumed that a one zetaflop(1000 exaflop) supercomputer is needed to model the entire world's weather for 2 weeks accurately...and is not thought to be possible till 2030...if India is able to make good on its aims, then an zetaflop might materialize even earlier than thought possible.

I bet the new generation of NVIDIA processors might be used...or something similar. India is also developing its own operating system for its military/civilian research computers, known as of now as the Indian operating system. DRDO(defense research & development Organization) is supposedly developing this in order to get rid of the multitude of security flaws found in most of the commercial operating systems. This exaflop computer would be a big milestone in computing as well as a boon for researchers and scientists.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Republicons propose to put the brakes on abacus development
Edited on Sun May-29-11 11:47 AM by SpiralHawk
"Cut the funding. Cut the funding, and cut taxes on the rich more more more...

Jeebus is coming after we get Xe (R) to start ARMageddon, so we don't need no steenking high-tech abucuses or shit like that."

- Republicons Against Everything but Tax Cuts for the Rich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vehl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. republcans are always anti science and short sighted
Edited on Sun May-29-11 11:48 AM by Vehl
money spent on education and science always pays dividends by orders of magnitude...while money spent on wars would be money literally down the drain.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
individual rights Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. LOL...
My weatherman can hardly predict what the weather will be tomorrow. Therefore, I will go out on a limb here:sarcasm:and predict that this computer will not allow them to predict what the weather will be in two weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vehl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. lol even this one cant :D
that's the point.

Its assumed that we need a 1 zetaflop for reliable 2 week modeling..which would be about 7 times more than this one..which by itself is 50000 times faster than the current fastest computer..so in other words even if the current weatherman used the fastest in the world(which he doesn't) he needs a machine about 350000 faster than it to predict with certainty :p

till then, as you pointed out..its making generalizations based on available incomplete(most mostly accurate) simulations

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. I hope they never need tech support
"Hello my name is John, have you tried turning it on and off? No? Hold please"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC