Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

America’s Infrastructure Deficit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 11:25 AM
Original message
America’s Infrastructure Deficit
from the Infrastructurist:



America’s Infrastructure Deficit
Posted on Wednesday January 5th by Eric Jaffe


Seven of the country’s major transit projects received a late (or very early) Christmas present last week, when the Federal Transit Administration announced the distribution of $182.4 million under the New Starts program, which provides aid to local subway, light rail, and bus rapid transit lines — and, we’ve argued, creates jobs in the process.

The recipients include New York’s Second Avenue Subway (nearly $41 million), for part of the route that will service Manhattan’s east side; the Washington, D.C., Metro (almost $20 million), for a five-station extension in Northern Virginia; and Utah’s popular TRAX system (roughly $20.6 million), for a nine-stop, 10.6-mile addition. The biggest winner was the Long Island Rail Road, which received more than $44 million for the construction of a passenger concourse in Grand Central Terminal (currently LIRR dumps passengers at Penn Station, on the west side). Quoth LaHood:

“We want to keep the projects moving and people working with these early investments, which will save these cities money over the long haul.”


Early infrastructure investment might be the plan for these seven projects — but unfortunately it’s not the plan for the country at large. Ezra Klein, no stranger to the argument that now is a great time to spend on infrastructure, says there are two types of deficits in present-day America: The budget deficit we’ve heard about to death, and the “investment” deficit that’s rarely mentioned. Infrastructure projects, Klein wrote Monday, are a great way to address the latter:

The American Society of Civil Engineers estimates that the nation needs about $2.2 trillion in infrastructure repairs and upgrades merely to bring the existing infrastructure up to “good condition.” But has America’s rallying cry really gone from “We’re No. 1″ to “We’re only $2.2 trillion away from good condition”? How inspiring.

Our runways are clogged, our rail system is decrepit, and our levees — well, the ASCE gave our levees a D-minus — and its report came out four years after Hurricane Katrina. But in 2011, infrastructure is more than roads, rails and runways. The United States lags the rest of the developed world in broadband speed, penetration and cost. The country has no smart grid to speak of. We don’t just need to bring our infrastructure up to “good condition.” We need to make it better.

Here’s the good news: Infrastructure investment is the best deal in the economy right now. Government borrowing costs are lower than they’ve been since the 1950s. Unemployment in the construction sector is above 15 percent, which means companies are desperate for work and bids to complete projects are coming in low. A weak global economy means cheap raw materials. Bottom line? These investments are more affordable now than they’re likely to be in a few years. We’d be foolish to miss this opportunity.


The opponents of passenger rail and public transit projects often mention high taxpayer cost like it’s the only important factor in infrastructure decisions. It’s time to mention opportunity cost as well.


http://www.infrastructurist.com/2011/01/05/americas-infrastructure-deficit/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jasigirl33 Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Inrastructure projects would be a boon to the economy...so long as
the Fed could prevent corruption or the organized crime kind and so long as fully documented, American citizens received the jobs and the job training that would be needed to give us a first-rate infrastructure. Not just in transit, but water, sewage transport and treatment; gas, electric grid, gasoline, raw materials, temporary shelter systems, emergency food distribution systems, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newest Reality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why would there be a will or effort to
mitigate the crumbling, American infrastructure? It has been decaying for decades and appears to be a tangible symbol of the future if we continue to follow the magic spell of the grossly distorted abstractions presented to us.

Resource issues will not allow a return to the days of wine and roses. While the information is out there, and it is nice to wish for a technological fix, the shiny things are distracting the body politic from what's under the carpet.

However, changes and better distribution of wealth could help to soften the blow for we, the unwashed masses. That's not going to be allowed as a priority during the resource decline, and that's what most of the consent management and manufacturing is geared towards.

It is their bottom-line versus ours. They being the Utopia-dwelling mega-deadbeat-rich, (and company/family). When resources get down to survival, survival and preservation will be the implied reward of the money and power. Politics as usual will only distract and maybe placate us on the way to these major changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC