"where sovereignty is irrelevant" but I see this "loss of sovereignty war" being increasingly waged by the corporate controlled government against the American Peoples' bodies and that's why we pursue creations like this.
I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale to anyone that believes such a device were it perfected or
even believed to be perfected would only be waged against terrorists or people about to commit violence in the future.
The new warfare opens up a Pandora's box, the implications of which are only beginning to be considered. What would be the reaction if Cuban armed forces had landed in Florida and assassinated Luis Posada and Orlando Bosch, two anti-Castro militants who were credibly charged with setting bombs in Havana and downing a Cuban airliner? Washington would treat it as an act of war. The problem with a foreign policy based on claw and fang is that, if one country claims the right to act independently of international law and the UN Charter, all countries can so claim.
Once an enormous intelligence bureaucracy is created—there are some 854,000 people with top-secrecy security clearance—it will be damned hard to dismantle it. And, since the very nature of the endeavor removes it from public oversight, it is a formula for a massive and uncontrolled expansion of the national security state.
Meanwhile health care, the environment, education, the nation's infrastructure and renewable, sustainable energy development, take a back seat to the art of waging war, surveillance and detection, it's as if the corporate controlled government knew that environmental collapse was coming but instead of seriously trying to change, evolve and adapt society in a holistic manner, decided that staying the course and preparing to wage war against its' own citizens when it all hits the fan is the path to be taken.
Thanks for the thread, Donnachaidh