Breitbart smearing Weiner: Accuses relationships with young girls

Conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart appeared on CNN Tuesday where he implied Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) had been engaged in inappropriate relationships with multiple young women.

Breitbart said that Dan Wolfe, the source for a lewd picture that allegedly appeared on Weiner’s Twitter account, had been tracking the congressman.

“I don’t know him that well, he has been monitoring relationships that Congressman Weiner has been having with women, young women, who claimed to have relationships with him,” Breitbart explained. “I’m not saying what type of relationships, but people that @RepWeiner follows. Girls that are quite young — younger than the girl in question here — talk openly about Rep. Weiner, who he follows these girls.”

Following Breitbart’s interview, CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin told host Randi Kaye that he regretted the network allowed Breitbart to make those claims.

http://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/05/breitbart-weiner-having-relationships-with-girls-that-are-quite-young/

End of story....

guy is stubborn & sticks in place, we need REAL Dems in power

And sadly some can't handle the truth.... so they play silly CON games.

And Anthony Weiner is going after Clarence Thomas.

because the rumor I've seen indicates that he has dementia from the syphilis he contacted by fucking farm animals.

he needs to show proof that this isn't true - otherwise - well - would it be an admission of guilt to ignore this claim?

Rep. Weiner Has Angry Exchange With Capital Hill Reporters Over Twitter Scandal
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/rep-weiner-has-angry-exchange-with-capital-hill-reporters-over-twitter-scandal/

Wiener told her to shut up about it. Seems fine to me.

and all the other shit repugs do. disgraceful. and her husband John was Jackass supreme as well. Thankfully Toobin pretty well told them that the circus will move on - Johnny curvy lip seemed to take offence at his colleagues choice of words.

If you think it didn't help, then you may be part of the problem ginning up anxiety over this....let his attorneys handle it.

I'm hoping none of this is true.

I value it at its true worth.

End of story.

Why was he following this 21 year old woman in the first place? I hope I'm wrong but I don't have a good feeling about this one.

let's hear it.

I'm not the one being accused of doing something wrong. Maybe it was part of the whole setup but why should I have to answer the question.

like he was stalking her - thats the tone she made.

I'd trust Wiener over asshole Briebart and anti-journalism any day.

They were referring to him following her on TWITTER, not in real life...

These responses are cracking me up.

Some people will only follow you if you follow them back.

How many OTHER people is Weiner following?

Looks like he's following 198 people and 49,166 people are following him.

Can't you SEE who someone is following on Twitter by simply clicking "Following" on their Twitter page?

I understand howTwitter works and know that many of these politicians and "stars" only follow people they know in real life or who are equally as famous as them. Who was this woman that he was following her? I could see if he was following thousands of people and she just happened to be one of them.

I follow John Cleese, Stephen Fry, the US State Department....and a girl in Dubai who photographs her lunch.

He doesn't follow many people and she happened to be one of them. Like I said in another post, maybe it was a part of the whole setup. Who knows? I just thought it was a good question.

End of story.

:crazy:

He must like old ladies!

:rofl:

I hope he doesn't send you a picture of his "frank". LOL

It's a possibility. I haven't finished watching the whole exchange so the whole thing might inflect my belief in that possibility- but I'm tossing it out there.

PB

This is the subject that peaks the interest of the political reporters at CNN? And Dan Abrams crappy vanity site is more than happy to stoke the fire?

Beltway reporters have no perspective.

comment that in any way contributed to a discussion other than lame attempts at humor.

So I am sincerely interested in what you mean by "Guilty or innocent, THIS doesn't help".

happily lapping up the Breitbart smear?

But I'm realistic about how this interview is going to play in the press.

n/t

End of story.

Bookmark this. There is more to this then Weiner wants to admit.

Brietbart is a sleazy POS, but that doesn't mean Weiner is innocent.

You then believe that merely a direct answer would deny this from playing out as it is? That a direct answer would prevent the gossip, the smears and the whispers?

I value it at its true worth.

now she's a cartoon. I can't believe how trashy CNN and Kaye have become.

Not intended to be a factual statement, but if we repeat it enough, it can become "truth".

Better get CNN in on this deal. They'll be GLAD to get this news.

cnn and faux have an enormous amount of influence on how this nation supposedly perceives itself

these are scary times.

You know this freak has plenty in his closet.

this is pissing me off

Sadly, some can't handle the truth so they resort to con games, and spammers like the ones we see on this thread.

the rest of you, eh not so much.

And they are so very, very concerned.

:hi:

I fear this will end badly.

I may not be a smart man, but I know when I see a lie. (Movie=Gump). Edwards redux.

And since everyone seems to think that him saying nothing means that he is guilty, if he did do it, why not just lie about it to begin with?

there's more than meets the eye. Mark my words.

Personally, I wonder if maybe that was an actual picture of him stored on one of his devices somewhere that was tweeted out by a hacker that gained access. If this is true, Weiner did nothing wrong, but I can see why he would want it to go away.

But do I believe the original story that was spun, especially after the reply by the person that was allegedly messaged? Hell no.

"here's more than meets the eye. Mark my words."

I imagine that if you believe the lack of predicated response is the same thing as a lie, then I can understand why you would infer as such... :shrug:

:yourock:

End of story.

Repetition and wishes do not make it so. Hacking someones account is a crime. Weiner should clear this up by calling for an investigation.

End of story.

jus cause you wanted it to be.

One of two ways this will go - Weiner is rosted

OR

(please god) brietbart and/or other conspirators are squished like toe-jam.

Either way, this is so not "end of story."

:mad:

:hi:

Breitbart, his masters and minions are becoming more professional.

Regardless of what breitbart and his gang of idiots are doing, people here and elsewhere actually believe that if the see it on the internets (or twitter), they think it is true.

:mad:

And they are all over this like buzzards on a garbage truck. Very sad.

Wiener must be stopped, obviously. This is the oldest trick in the book.

He is a liar, an agitator for the far right.

Also, anyone can follow you (and you follow them) on twitter.

because he's so solid on Israel. But do you really think he didn't send that photo? With all the special safeguards on congressional cell phones, there's no way that was hacked.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

words over and over will not make it so.

Tell me about these congressional cellphone safeguards?

If you think it's impossible to crack someone's Twitter password, you don't know a whole lot. You signed up for that?

Republicans respond by lying about Anthony Weiner.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Anyone remember that?

We have real issues, why be distracted by fucking like some eternal private middle school?

There better be some shady influence or the whole matter is pure distraction true, false, or somewhere in between.

Rep. Weiner to Explore Civil and Criminal Charges in Alleged Twitter Hack Attack
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1206545

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1206970
In advanced stage, this disease can cause the sufferer to have neurological deficits which might cause erratic behavior, hallucinations, and telling real big stinky lies.

http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/syphilis-tertiary/overview.html

and something about syphilis..

...is either...


Working for the Right

A victim of the Right

Crazy

or any combination of the above.



end of story.

I have started going through these threads on the Weiner incident and have noticed that if I thumb through and only look at the post count, anyone with a post count under 100 is showing great concern that Weiner was guilty of something. I have to wonder....no, I am pretty sure, Breitbart has sent out the troll brigade to hit every website possible to spread his message of concern. It is the old theory of repeating a lie until it becomes true.

might send rat fuckers to a site like DU?

I don't know that any of his websites BigGovernment.com and BigJournalism.com and BigHollywood.com have commented on the accusation by others that he has syphilis from fucking farm animals - maybe they're too busy spreading lies about Weiner because Clarence Thomas is a fucking corrupt and worthless piece of shit who should be impeached.

All I can assume is that Breitbart has contracted syphilis, as passed along by several anonymous sources within some sort of administration.

I wouldn't want him smearing anything on me if the rumor is true that Andrew Breitbart is suffering from dementia brought on by the syphilis he contracted while having sex with farm animals.

I know who I believe and it ain't Breitfart