Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Didn't SENATOR VITTER solicit prostitutes in 2 states

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 12:32 AM
Original message
Didn't SENATOR VITTER solicit prostitutes in 2 states
Neither one of which was Nevada....

Where's the pout-rage over having an actual SEX CRIMINAL in the Senate. A congressman's alleged photo in underwear so so much worse, right?

This is such bullshit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jorno67 Donating Member (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Vitter has an (R) by his name...so that makes it ok.
Do as they say - NOT as they do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rincewind Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, but he is a republican.
So, all he had to do, was wait I few days after the news came out, then hold a press conference with his wife at his side. He then said that he had prayed for forgiveness, and that Jesus had forgiven him. The wife then gave the reporters a sickly little smile, and poof, no more scandal. And since Jesus has forgiven him, you can't bring it up without pissing Jesus off. So don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. I've been curious about this myself.
Edited on Thu Jun-02-11 12:52 AM by pa28
How is it that Vitter gets a free pass from the media?

You have a US senator caught hiring a high priced prostitute to fulfill his diaper fetish and it's not a story. Alternatively you have a back bench congressman who *might* have tweeted a semi-dressed picture of himself and suddenly CNN decides to go prime time on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. He's probably
giving bj's to the enitre press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Attacking Democrats gets you promoted on your "fair and balanced" credentials.
Attacking Republicans just gets you fired. That's life in the "liberal media".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Nail meet hammer. Spot on pa28 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. I concur
THIS IS BULLSHIT. These pugs are really getting on my last damn nerve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Pout-rage?
Hell, he won re-election!

I just don't get it.

:banghead:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newest Reality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. Prostitutes have
no impact on my life, as far as I know.

I am more concerned about the obvious and continual carnal knowledge that most of our politicians are having with corporations and their CEO's and executives in just about every controlling industry that is set on making us powerless Serfs forever with no liberty or power that we can ever utilize again.

Power porn is the only kind of porn that has any significance right now and there is a real, down and dirty orgy going on that we really need to be paying close attention to.

So, they can feed us all the juicy gossip about the inconsequential intersections of naughty bits, but that only turns out to be a distraction from the ultimately royal fucking we are getting behind our own backs in ways we won't ever want to admit after the deed is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 05:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. agreed but it's the hypocrisy
Of "oh well, everybody sins" when they guy actually COMMITS A CRIME and HE NEEDS TO RESIGN when there's a possible underwear pic if him existing in the universe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. What happens if he was paying for the services with political favors?
Isn't that something we should be aware of?

Its not the sex. Be the same as if it was an illegal gambling debt or anything illegal he may have been doing. The question is did Vitter compromise his Senate seat?

Guess we will never know?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
13. The media was all over Vitter. That was a while ago now.
Apparently, the people of Louisiana didn't care too much about it. They reelected William "90 grand in the freezer" Jefferson, too. What does it take to piss off Louisiana?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. no they didn't reelect Jefferson
he did win a Democratic primary but lost his seat in the general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Sorry, must have been the primary i heard about. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. He was reelected after the money was found in the freezer (2006) but then lost in 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Thanks for clearing that up. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Baloney - the corporate media completely blew off Vitter's Diaper Sex with hookers
Edited on Fri Jun-03-11 06:04 AM by SpiralHawk
a couple of stories. Then they dropped it right after Vitter's Republicon Senate colleages gave him a Standing Ovation for his adulterous romp in Dy Dees.

Extramarital Diaper Sex with hookers is a Republicon Family Values.

Even though it is not an American value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. The diaper story came from a single blog and wasn't verified.
Edited on Fri Jun-03-11 06:28 AM by dorkulon
As I recall, it was a New Orleans blogger who said Canal street hookers called him "Vitter the Shitter," but to report something that wild in the MSM, you need 2 sources. The only hard facts were that he solicited prostitutes. And I know I'm not the only one who saw that press conference footage with his wife in that leopard print dress. There was plenty of coverage.

I realize DUers are not pleased that this Weiner story is getting play in the media, but I think all the talk here about how this would be a non-story if it were a Republican is just confirmation bias. If it were a Republican, and it was getting precisely the same amount of coverage, we'd all be complaining about how the press was "ignoring" the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Uhh, you are saying there are "2 sources" for the Weiner twitter fiasco?
No way. The corporate media never made an ongoing circus out of Vitter's diaper escapades. You can say say that's because they only had one source. But here they have made a huge stinking circus of the Weiner photo -- and the source is a totally discredited Republicon propaganda pimp named Brietbart, and an anonymous "patriot76."

Clearly, the corporate media gave Vitter a huge freaking corporate republicon pass. And clearly the corporate media is having an ugly, perverted ongoing orgasm about an incident that is -- all things considered -- far less important.

Vitter was not held to public accountability for his illegal acts, his marriage violations, or his rank hypocrisy.

That kind of different treatment for Republicon siNNers is, to put it mildly, profoundly unfair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Vitter didn't do a series of interviews in which he "couldn't say" whether he likes to poop diapers.
He admitted soliciting prostitutes and then hid from the media until they forgot about him. Doing all these "can't say with certitude" interviews was an unforced error on Weiner's part, wherein he himself stoked the fire and kept the story in the news cycle.

Clearly, even if Weiner had taken and tweeted the photo, it wouldn't come close to Vitter's crimes. I doubt Weiner will resign, and I bet he gets reelected too, as his district isn't a very prudish one. I hope he can shrug this off--he's one of the only congressmen I actually like. But he hasn't handled this very well.

Vitter couldn't be charged legally because the statute of limitations had already run out by the time he was busted, which is a shame IMHO. But if you think he was reelected because people didn't know about the hooker stuff, I have to disagree. Everyone knows about that, because the press DID cover it. He just didn't prolong the coverage by going on a media tour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC