Stewart chides Weiner for not knowing his own junk

Source:RawReplay
By Stephen C. Webster

The so-called ‘Weinergate’ scandal continues … And somehow, gets even more absurd.

On Thursday’s Daily Show, Jon Stewart seemed a little more than surprised at Rep. Anthony Weiner’s answer to questions about whether or not a lewd photo his Twitter account sent out was of him. He told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, “I can’t say for sure.”

“There are three things in this world that I do have certitude on,” Stewart responded. “Empire Strikes Back is the best Star Wars movie. O.J. killed those two people. And the third one… is what my erect penis looks like in my own underwear — from a bird’s eye view of course.”

This video is from The Daily Show, broadcast Wednesday, June 1, 2011

http://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/06/stewart-chides-weiner-for-not-knowing-his-own-junk/

might answer as Rep. Weiner did on Rachel's program. But if one has never taken photos of ones junk, then the answer is "no, not my photo."

Right or not?

Why parse the answer for goodness sake!!!

the really incredible ways one can take a perfectly innocent pic, twist it manipulate it, till it isn't anything like the original. Once the digital forensic signatures are identified (if they can be), we may find it was originally a photo of his where he's for example standing around in grey sweats or photo manipulated from some college photo of years ago that was replicated.

If he's going to have it analyzed that deeply, he's best to say he doesn't know yet, because it may be the base photo was, and then he'd be accused of lying.

There's no way I could tell. Someone could take a picture of theirself, stuff a LARGE salami down their drawers, and say it was mine. I mean, how many men wear Fruit of the Looms that looks like they stuffed a large salmi down them? 15? 20?

It coulda been any one of them!

He's obviously implying that yes, his weiner is that big, but he can't say for certain that the picture is of said weiner. Simple :-)