Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Psychology Today removes offensive contributor Satoshi Kanazawa

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 04:27 PM
Original message
Psychology Today removes offensive contributor Satoshi Kanazawa
Edited on Thu Jun-02-11 04:28 PM by ProfessionalLeftist
June 1, 2011

NEW YORK – Psychology Today, the publication that recently came under fire for allowing a dehumanizing article to be published on its website two weeks ago, today stated that controversial contributor Satoshi Kanazawa – the author of the article in question – is no longer contributing to the publication and that they are taking the necessary steps to prevent an incident like this from ever happening again.

According to an e-mail sent to ColorOfChange.org – the nation’s largest African-American online political organization who asked its members to flood the editorial offices of Psychology Today with phone calls, e-mails and Facebook and Twitter comments and demand clarification – Psychology Today is no longer allowing Kanazawa to contribute to the publication. “We are currently implementing measures to ensure more rigorous oversight of blogs prior to publication, including nights and weekends, when this was posted. The blogger in question is no longer contributing to the site,” said Kaja Perina, editor-in-chief of Psychology Today.

Two weeks ago, Psychology Today posted an article on their website from controversial contributor, Satoshi Kanazawa. The article – “Why Are African-American Women Less Physically Attractive Than Other Women?” – attempted to use pseudo-scientific evidence to explain why Kanazawa thought black women were less physically attractive than white women.

http://www.colorofchange.org/press/releases/2011/6/39/?akid=2008.1114949.DXR9ej&rd=1&t=2

I've personally found this blogger/author's contributions to PT offensive for quite some time. He finally pissed off enough people that the pop-psych rag had to do something about him. This is IMO good news as some of their other bloggers are decent - he really lowered the quality of the site/publication considerably - even though it is "just a popular psychology site."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
John_Adams Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. How can you prove something that "is in the eye of the beholder?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Beauty- there are societal conventions, some of which cross boundaries. For instance, symmetry.
Edited on Thu Jun-02-11 04:59 PM by KittyWampus
People see symmetrical faces as more beautiful.

edit- I'm not supporting the thesis mentioned in the article. Just saying there are things humans consider beautiful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. how unbelievably out of your mind do you have to be to pose a
'thesis' like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC