Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Edwards Case: Pitfalls Abound For Prosecutors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 10:41 AM
Original message
John Edwards Case: Pitfalls Abound For Prosecutors
RALEIGH, N.C. -- Two crucial witnesses are dead. Another is 100 years old. A fourth was recently held in contempt of court. The daring indictment of two-time presidential candidate John Edwards has pitfalls at every turn for federal prosecutors, adding strain to a Justice Department section still trying to recover after botching its last major political case. (snip)

At the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which typically criticizes the Justice Department for not pursuing enough cases against public officials, executive director Melanie Sloan questioned why federal officials were spending resources on this one. She said it is unlikely prosecutors can prove that participants of the scheme intended for the money to aid Edwards' candidacy, and Sloan said it was a stretch to argue that private plane flights provided to mistress Rielle Hunter should somehow be considered campaign contributions.

"This is a really broad definition of campaign contribution," said Sloan, a former federal prosecutor. "It has never been this broadly interpreted."

Sloan predicted a judge will toss the case before it goes to trial.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/04/john-edwards-case-prosecutors_n_871382.html?icid=main%7Chtmlws-main-n%7Cdl1%7Csec1_lnk3%7C215119

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. "This is a really broad definition of campaign contribution,"
Meanwhile . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Since both donors paid gift taxes (from another thread) on the moneys given
to hide the affair, it makes it harder to prove they were campaign donations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, there is a difference between being a cad and a criminal.
This was said on one of the morning shows today and I agree. If the goal is to make sure he feels like shit for the rest of his life, then I guess you could call this a victory. The guy is ruined already and he knows it. What purpose is served to continue this shaky criminal case against him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CelticThunder Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. But he's a Democrat. Nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Pitfalls abound for defense, too
While the case for the prosecution may be a novel application of the law, and the law a bit vague, when JE gets up in front of a jury it may not matter. (The New York Times, acknowledging the problems for the prosecution, also noted this aspect, which has been totally absent from most analyses.) There is so little sympathy for his behavior, and for the secret machinations of the super-wealthy (not to mention the very explicit note Mrs. Mellon sent saying how they could skirt the law by her paying for campaign related stuff this way), that a jury might decide to convict on some counts regardless. He may think he can charm a jury or play on their sympathies, but I am not in the least convinced of that being a successful strategy.

We shall see: it will be a lot like the Blagojevich trial, where nothing actually happened but a lot of really slimy things were caught on tape. That case is about to wrap up. If he is convicted, I'd say JE should reconsider a generous plea deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. When Schwarzenegger was campaigning for governor, he had PLENTY of GOP operatives spreading dough
around to keep all his MANY extramarital affairs and extramarital children from stopping his campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Let Johnny sweat it out for awhile
Clearly, he didn't learn from Bill Clinton's example that you really won't get away with this, maybe the next idiot who tries this will think twice.

Yes, I resent John Edwards, if Barack Obama had decided to wait it out in 2008, he might have been the nominee. We'd be dealing with Vice-President Palin right now.

And speaking of the Clintons, I'll bet Hillary thinks that she would have been the nominee if Edwards had stayed out. I'll bet that when the story is told, she's a major mover behind this prosecution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. There is something fish about the Edwards prosecution.
Why him and why now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC