Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So - did the Senate change the filibuster rules today?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 09:07 PM
Original message
So - did the Senate change the filibuster rules today?
Or was that just a bunch of noise and smoke?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. The first...
...legislative day, during which the rules may be changed, and the first calendar day, are different critters. Rule changes may not receive a vote till much later in the month. I've heard the 24th tossed around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Really? Before the end of the year what was being said was - January 5th was the day
the *only* day that the Senate rules could be changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. NPR said less than 30 min. ago that Reid had "stopped the clock" and the rule
change may not happen till the 24th if it happens at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thanks - I was irked at Reid for not doing something about it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. My understanding is that Reid blew through it and it never...
came up.

It is not going to happen because the Dems would be screwed if they lose the Senate.

Sonoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Actually things were introduced today
as in reforms

http://www.ktvz.com/news/26379932/detail.html

They did not vote on it, but they were already introduced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Wrong. See post #7 below.
Edited on Wed Jan-05-11 09:18 PM by pnwmom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here's the answer according to CNN:
Edited on Wed Jan-05-11 09:17 PM by pnwmom
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/01/05/senate.filibuster.changes/

Typically, a Senate rule change requires a super majority of 67 yes votes, something that will be difficult for Democrats, with their narrow 53-seat majority, to achieve. However, on the first legislative day of a new Congress, a simple majority of senators, just 51 votes, can approve new rules.

SNIP

Because negotiations need time to play out, Senate leaders won't adjourn after Wednesday's session, during which new members will be sworn in.

Instead, the technical "legislative day" will be extended through at least January 24, when senators return from a two-week break. Doing so will allow Democrats to preserve their ability to pass the reforms with just 51 votes if negotiations break down.

SNIP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. There process has started
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why now when we can say they are not getting things done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes, and the GOP created a gazillion well paying jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC