Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Nearly Triples Bagram Detainee Population

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:47 AM
Original message
Obama Nearly Triples Bagram Detainee Population
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/obama_nearly_triples_bagram_detainee_population_20110606/?ln

The number of detainees at a military detention center in Afghanistan has almost tripled those held by the Bush administration in the three years since President Obama took office.

A recent report by Human Rights First compares the detention center at the Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan to the notorious prision at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba, in part because it is now hosting more than 10 times as many prisoners, and because many of those detained are not given “an adequate opportunity to defend themselves against charges that they are collaborating with insurgents and present a threat to U.S. forces.”

In an interview with Salon.com, Daphne Eviatar, senior associate for Human Rights First, explained that while early on (aka the Bush era) there were “terrible abuses” and “reports of people being killed in custody and tortured,” now the beef human rights organizations have with the detention center is focused on legal status and representation. “The two biggest are to improve the representation for detainees and to reduce the reliance on classified evidence,” she said. “Because really those things amount to detainees not being able to defend themselves.” —BF

:snip:

I spoke to the author of the report, Daphne Eviatar, a senior associate in the law and security program at Human Rights First who traveled to Bagram to observe the situation first-hand. The following transcript of our conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

More at the link --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Talk about Change. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. "According to today’s report, there have been a number of improvements over the past two years"
From the report linked to in the piece, NEW REPORT: Improvements to U.S. Detention Practices in Afghanistan Necessary to Protect U.S. National Security

<...>

The report– “Detained and Denied in Afghanistan: How to Make U.S. Detention Comply with the Law” –is based on the observation by Human Rights First of hearings given to detainees by the U.S. military in Sept. 2010 and Feb. 2011, as well as an Afghan trial supported by the U.S. military in February. In addition, HRF conducted interviews with 18 former detainees, all of whom had been released from U.S. custody within the previous year. This report follows up on Human Rights First’s earlier report, issued two years ago, on US and Afghan detention practices in Afghanistan.

According to today’s report, there have been a number of improvements over the past two years, since the suspension of the Bush administration’s completely secret detainee assessment process. For example, the Obama Administration now allows detainees to attend at least a portion of a hearing and address a board of U.S. military officers examining their case. Each detainee is now assigned a “personal representative” to help present the case and is entitled to a new status hearing every six months. The military has also implemented some of the recommendations that Human Rights First made in its last report, such as:

  • Allowing human rights organizations to observe hearings;

  • Excluding evidence obtained through torture or cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment;

  • Embarking on efforts to improve the prosecution of national security detainees in Afghan courts.
Even so, Human Rights First’s on-the-ground research in Afghanistan revealed that the current detention system remains plagued by failures to comply with international law. Case examples drawn from this research are featured in the report to underscore Human Rights First’s key findings:

<...>

“Even after the United States withdraws the bulk of its troops from Afghanistan, ongoing support for its fledgling justice system will be necessary, and critical to the country’s stable development,” Eviatar concludes. “Human Rights First urges the United States government to take a long-term view of the problem and to commit to civilian assistance for Afghan judges, lawyers and legal institutions far into the future.”

(emphasis added)

That's change!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Just want to say ProSense, I'm sure glad you're around to
debunk most of the crap that gets posted daily on DU.

Thank you very much. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Can't come up with a rational argument, huh? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. As long as they are treated a little better, it's ok to detain more of them.
I didn't know that rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Your logic
not mine. The fact that the President increased focus on the war in Afghanistan likely has a lot to do with the increase in detainees.

Strange that the focus is on the increase, not the important improvements to policy.

Would it be better to have fewer detainees and Bush's policies?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Yet another idea to consider is to focus on departing Afghanistan and
any other -istan suffixed country US troops might be in and leave the detainees there. They would no longer be detainees, and Obama would no longer be engaged in the Bush wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yes, no more leg beatings. Only stress positions and audio torture now.
Gobama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. BS! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwishiwas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. And for every detainee, there are 20+ family members and friends
who hate us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not our Obama! (Fingers to my chest) It's not possible, he has a D after his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC