Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It troubles me greatly to post this, but if Rep Weiner did........

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:06 AM
Original message
It troubles me greatly to post this, but if Rep Weiner did........
I've been following politics for going on forty years and sometimes you watch this stuff unfold and have a feeling when someone might not be telling the truth.

I sincerely hope that Rep. Weiner is telling the truth about his pictures. I really, really hope so because this man has been one of those we so badly need to take the fight to the feet of our foes. However, the more this goes on, I believe we are about to find out that he has been untruthful in this matter and his career is going to be seriously harmed.

Sure, people here believe "who cares" and "so what" and "it's between adults" and blah, blah, blah. But it's more important than that.

We have put our trust in a person who is possibly lying to us and in lying to us, he is only strengthening the power of the bastard Breitbart. If Weiner is lying, then at the end of the day, Breitbart will emerge vidicated and be able to continue his "journalism". Not only that, we will have lost one willing to pick up the battle.

And if I am wrong, and I actually hope I am wrong, I will gladly eat these words and gladly plant the remains of the crow right upon my head.

But I don't think I am.

And for those that still believe this is a bullshit and meaningless tale, well, sorry, but our side too often tries to claim the upper-morality hand, but if we have a congress person behaving this way and ignore it, then really, how much better than them are we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. If Ted Kennedy could remain a Senator after Chappaquiddick
Weiner can certainly remain a Congressman after WeinerWienerGate. But he will never achieve any higher office; no Mayoralty of NYC or runs for President. My guess is he will retreat quietly into the privates sector (oops that's *private* sector).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. But don't you think times are different?
Now days it seems like things that would have ended careers years ago no longer do so today. And then, this also seems to be true of some people all together (to this day I can't imagine how David Vitter STILL remains in office).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. I think he'll have no trouble winning re-election.
"He may be a penis-tweeting sleazebag but he's *our* penis-tweeting sleazebag!".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:10 AM
Original message
it troubles me greatly anyone here believes shitstain Breitbart
Edited on Mon Jun-06-11 11:11 AM by Whisp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benlurkin Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:32 AM
Original message
Will you be convinced with pictures?
We got a picture of "somebody's" pecker last week and look how this blew up. Breitbart just started posting more pics (Mr. Weiner with his cats) and it's going to get really bad considering his lack of lack ethics and consideration for Mr. Weiner's privacy.

We have seen how this has played out with Breitbart before. He starts slowing letting things trickle out and he's saving the big bomb for later. He's a prick. He needs to be stopped!

This has NOTHING to do with Anthony Weiner as an important Progressive and how much we need him and more of him on our side right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
43. I don't think it's a matter of believing him...
IMO, it's more a matter of having reasonable doubt that he's lying.

Even liars tell the truth every now and then.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. I can't believe that some here place so much faith in Breitbart's "facts".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. It's larger than that guy....
Weiner's answers, his behavior, now other politicians, not only these, but other things show the narrative is larger than Breitbart.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. ya know what? If Weiner works for his constituents and US (meaning the little guy)
I don't give a flying flatulent frog how many pictures he's taken of his jockeys!

Hell -- I'll buy him a NEW camera with a zoom feature if he continues to fight for US. I'll offer to TAKE the damned pictures, too!

Personally, I think this is a smear campaign against one of the REAL good guys -- not the *good guy while the press is here and the mike is open*.

And I'm really stunned that an underwear photo can get so many knickers wadded here on this board. It's embarrassing.

IMO -- YMMV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
44. The photo you refer to
looked like the guy had a 4-cell maglight in his drawers. According to Jon Stewart, Weiner is not particularly well endowed. It's not surprising that he doesn't want to deny it's him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
45. It's not his "facts" that makes people say "hmmmm"....
It's wondering why anybody who is truly innocent of something would be so evasive.

Tell you what...if someone accused me of doing something I KNOW I did not do, I'd have steam coming out of my ears as I angrily denied everything.

Not playing word games with reporters.


That is what's so disturbing to many of us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chrisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm with you.
Edited on Mon Jun-06-11 11:16 AM by chrisa
I don't know much about the man or care, but a sexually deviant politician isn't really that hard to imagine.

However, (and I would say this for a Republican politician too), I think he should be given the benefit of the doubt until the picture is actually proven to be him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. Andrew Breitbart has syphilis.
Next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mfcorey1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. I would still vote for Weiner if it proved true. I agree that he is one voice that we do not
silenced in this war against the right and their attempts to destroy way of life for the underserved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. If Weiner did it, that means Clarence Thomas is an innocent lamb...
...and Weiner was on the wrong side of every other argument too, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. Thanks for taking my post completely out of contest......
appreciate it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. My point is the entire thing is a distraction from what is important....
...why would we be all hung up over a Senator emailing a pic of his schlong hidden by jockey shorts when we don't get upset over Senators voting to end Medicare, wage immoral wars, spy on US citizens, etc.???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. Jon Stewart blew the first allegation out of the water using specs on the camera used.
That is good enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. He then told Weiner to "come clean" about the picture.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. Well I don't get why he doesn't simply disclaim the damned thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. I think that's the point.
He would have if he could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Actually if it was someone else's camera that might be worse.
Unless it was his wife's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. If it's a picture of him. Sure
I'm not up on whatever was released earlier today... so that may be moot at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #26
38. Why didn't President Obama release his birth certificate from the beginning?
Because it was FUCKING STUPID that he had to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #38
46. It was stupid, but the point is....
He never played evasive little games with people.

He always claimed to have been born in Hawaii. He didn't hem and haw and claim he didn't know. His claim was, is, and always will be, that he is a US citizen.

Weiner, OTOH, has been evasive almost since day one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #38
48. The idiots sure shut up though.
He destroyed Trump over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
14. The problem is that we go through this every time Breitbart lies
The MSM media approaches his BS stories as if it could be true as well as many DUers and because of this, the reputation of the people and organizations he attacks are permanently tarnished. Even though his lies have been uncovered time and time again, he keeps doing this crap because it is still working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
15. You're right
And it sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
16. Folks - let me be clear - I CAN'T STAND Briebart and long for the day...
this turd gets his and the media send him to an island far into the night and we never hear from him again.

The guy is a nut and I hope I'm wrong and this story will end up being the last nail in this guy's coffin.

But from someone who has watched politics for a long time, there are parts to this story that seem to be suggesting otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. The fact that he wasn't denying the picture was him was a big red flag.
The new picture with the "me" sign is nothing as long as there isn't a story to go with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. I hear what you're saying....
and obviously things would be better if Rep. Weiner would fight back the way we all assumed he would, but at this point I just think we're better off by assuming every thing that Breitbart says is one fat lie. The burden of proof is on Breitbart and so far the crotch shot tweet was shot down, the characters involved are looking extremely suspicious, and the new photo Breitbart has is just Weiner holding up a sign that says "me" on it. Nothing dirty, but Breitbart wants to continue this narrative that Weiner is flirting with young women on twitter so any picture will do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
34. Wait for it.....wait....BUT...There it is.
It's the old "Well, he's a great American leader.........BUT......" bullshit, all over again.

I'm disgusted by your OP and the entire tenor of this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
19. Noted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
23. Yet David Vitter's career is booming, and his "sins" were far worse than anything Weiner has been
alleged of doing. John Ensign did much worse and has been allowed to remain in office for the rest of his term. I know that you don't accept what those two scumbags did but the media apparently found it easy enough to forgive them. Why not Weiner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alc Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
27. morality isn't the issue in lies by politicians
If there's something they don't want us to know, they are open to blackmail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
29. Whatfuckingever...
Some of us just wait to see how things turn out. Others form negative judgments as soon as possible. Have a real nice day, won't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
31. In other news: people who are paying attention disregard your post nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
35. The op Fails on so many levels.
Unrec.

:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #35
50. Ooohhh.....the dreaded "unrec"......not one word about how it "fails"...
I'm sorry, but if don't think our leaders do not have a responsibility to us or the truth.....well......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #50
57. About sex?

NO!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. It's not "about" sex....
it's the lying about the scandal.

Hell, if he had came clean from the start he probably would have survived this. But I bet over the next few days or weeks he will end up resigning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. I'll take that bet.
I made a killing off of people that said President Clinton would be thrown out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #61
64. You are aware of how.....
bad it is going to get, right?

(I am really stunned at how many times we have seen this story in American politics before and how so few here recognize the same story being played out. The Weiner drips are soon going to turn into a gusher.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
36. I don't give a solitary fuck about an underwear picture
or what you perceive as moral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Perhaps you should. If it
was a republican you would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #40
54. I was actually surprised Rep. Lee resigned

FWIW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #40
63. No, I wouldn't. Not beyond using it as a billy club to trash them on high hypocrisy.
The moment they give up on running on "family values" and using religion as justification for regressive policies is the day I don't give a rat's ass who they fuck, or play footsie under the stall with, or cheat on.

I don't care about their sexual practices, I care that they use a bunch of nonsense to justify bad policy positions and to rile up the church lady vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
39. Agree. New woman
supposedly surfaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. you actually -believe- anything that spews out of Breitbart's mouth?
:wow:

a proven liar and media terrorist? :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Big effin deal...a Twitter connection?..oh the horror
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lillypaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
47. k & r
I hope it's really "nothing" - but I think it's looking bad at the moment. I'm hoping he wouldn't have been that careless, at least. But folks, we can't be like the other side and defend the indefensible. Breitbart IS a shit stain, and he's probably royally pissed off at all the syphilis talk. I hate it that this is happening. I hate it that sometimes people can be so stupid (Bill Clinton, John Edwards, et al). If it's true, what a fucking waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
49. Here's the sad thing - let's look at character and reputation....
People here upset with this post appear to be primarily focused on one thing: the lying turd Breitbart. I don't blame them. I despise this man as well.

But there is another aspect of this story other than just Breitbart.

But here is something major that is very troubling: Let's examine the character of each men here - and then ask, which person is remaining true to his regularly known character and reputation?

On one hand, you have a lying, sleazebag turd, who spreads rumors, lies, innuendos at will - Breitbart.

Then, on the other hand you have a firebrand politician who has shown at no time a fear of speaking his mind. A man who has consistently shown he is not afraid to tell it how it is and not afraid to take on the powerful - Weiner.

Now, here's the odd thing - in this troubling time, which of these two have been consistent in their characters and reputations?

Would people not expected Weiner to have exploded and demanded criminal investigations if all of this had been fabricated?

I guess we are about to find out. Just saw a report Weiner is going to speak about this at 4pm Eastern Time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
51. "I didn't have communications with that woman"?
Seriously?

He's accused of typing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. Haven't you learned one of the biggest rules about scandals?
It's not the scandal, it's the covering up of the scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Bullshit.
"We have you on video beating your wife"
"My wife and I both can prove that you're lying."
"Okay then, here's a video of you yelling at your dog."
"Who cares if I yell at my dog?"
"Aha! Coverup!"

The belief that there's no privacy boundary for personal conduct is destroying this country.

Please explain to me what relevance Weiner's chatroom conversations have to me. If you can't do that, then I. Don't. Fucking. Care. In fact, I shouldn't care because it's none of my business who he talks to.

Was the other party underage? Was there anything otherwise illegal about it? Was he having sex with hookers? Picking up men in public restrooms? Going awol from his job to meet his girlfriend? Sleeping with lobbyists?

Everything is okay if you're a republican. The corollary is that nothing is okay if you're a democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. The point is....
he lied. He lied to his family, he lied to his constituents, he lied to Democrats and he lied to all those who give a shit.

I frankly don't care if he sends a picture of his cock to a consenting adult. However, he lied about it and in lying about it he has now just help create a fucking giant out of Breitbart.

My goodness, how that bastard must be gloating. You know why? Because it takes a thinking person to dissect the ACORN scandal and the Shirley Sherrod bullshit he pulled. And now he has the simplest of narratives to prop him up.

And no where did I excuse the terrible behavior of others to make some sort of argument. That is not the issue, anyway. Weiner's lying is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
52. Apparently, its ok to bang prostitutes while in Congress, but you better keep your shirt on.
Oh brother ...

And the folks who do the moralizing are the ones on the RIGHT side of the aisle in Congress.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chrisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
56. Well, unfortunately your fears came true.
Edited on Mon Jun-06-11 04:55 PM by chrisa
Doh! :crazy:

It was pretty obvious there was more to this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. And I am so sad, disgusted and angry....
It seems as soon as we get a person so willing to fight for us this happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
62. it's more a question about simply adhering to the values one speaks of.
"but our side too often tries to claim the upper-morality hand..."

Actually, I don't think our side doesn't make sex or family values a platform advertisement. From where I sit, it's not a questions about gaining an upper hand, it's more a question about simply adhering to the values one speaks of and runs on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC