|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
rsmith6621 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:40 PM Original message |
Weiner......With Certitude He Just Lost all Credibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. pictures of weeners are to distracting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalLoner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Okay, this is totally inappropriate and I will be flamed (rightly so) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:46 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. lol, wonder what the circumcision-shouter thinks now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. Beg to differ. I think he's on the way back to regaining the credibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalLoner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. I do give him credit for that. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 05:47 PM Response to Reply #2 |
34. After playing a game of chicken where he called someone's bluff and lost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalLoner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yes. He made some terrible mistakes, all right. I don't know if he will even be able to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
4. He didn't lose credibility with many of us. We're moving on, albeit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 07:15 PM Response to Reply #4 |
47. Some, apparently, are neither shocked nor dismayed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
5. Definitely. He deliberately and callously played his loyal liberal base for fools. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:49 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. Emotional problems apparently, maybe he can address them now.. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:52 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Yeah, I hope so, for his poor bride's sake. It's ironic that Huma is Hillary's personal aide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 05:43 PM Response to Reply #17 |
32. And now Nancy Pelosi is on the warpath threatening an ethics review |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
6. I really felt he could have been the one to take over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalLoner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Yeah it is. :( n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. The BIG PLUS is that we know now not later when he's presidential.. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 04:11 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. Really sad to allow your manhood to get the better of you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 04:13 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. +1000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 04:12 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. Yep, unlike Edwards who "confined" the field too late in the game when his secret came out! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 04:15 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. The difference between Edward and Weiner is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 04:30 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Certainly not trying to equivalence what Weiner did in terms of the actual event... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
11. This whole "scandal" is a sham and a distraction - nobody cares, quite rightly, except |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
12. Wouldn't that be "credibilitude"? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawson Leery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
13. Now that piece of horse manure Breitbart will have some credibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 04:01 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Drudge had Bubba. National Enquirer had Edwards. Breitbart has Weiner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erose999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 06:31 PM Response to Reply #13 |
46. The only thing Breitbart has is syphilis from fucking farm animals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zookeeper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
14. There's still more to the story. Funny, how this came up two... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Enough with the baseless conspiracy theories. Haven't we seen enough of them here lately? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zookeeper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 04:03 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. The timing was just a little too convenient, considering.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 04:10 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Not interested in yet another ludicrous conspiracy theory. Peddle that nonsense to someone else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zookeeper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 04:12 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Then put me on "ignore." n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 05:49 PM Response to Reply #14 |
37. If it wasn't now, it would have been some other time..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lbrtbell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
19. I wanted to say this before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 04:18 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. I really thought it might be that he might have had some personal communication to his wife hijacked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
24. no he didn't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
29. Now he joins the Scott Ritter club for me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
33. Not with me, he didn't. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
35. Damned If He Did, Damned If He Didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 05:49 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. he sure as shit did lie about it. repeatedly. he said over and over that he was hacked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 06:07 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. We Don't Know How The Pictures Became Public... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
36. He lost it with regard to sex. But my problem is with his judgment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
39. Quoting a comment from a FB post: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erose999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
41. He never said the pics weren't his. He might not have been straight up, but would you be if you were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bighart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
42. Lying tends to make that happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TygrBright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
43. On what subject? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
44. don't agree - he will survive this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-06-11 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
45. I don't care if he lied about the photos. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC