Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If I was a Congressman, you were my wife or girlfriend, and you were interested in BDSM...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:34 PM
Original message
If I was a Congressman, you were my wife or girlfriend, and you were interested in BDSM...
...I can't say that I wouldn't at least try a little something involving handcuffs or a playful spanking. We're all human beings here, and when it comes to sexual expression, everyone is different. I accept that. We all have limits, but we all have fantasies, too.

As long as it stays between the two of us, then it doesn't belong on anyone else's radar, especially if our little diversions do not affect either my performance as a legislator or her performance at her chosen calling. Even if it's building dog houses with fluffy cushions for rescues from abusive or neglectful homes.

But this is where Weiner made his big mistake. He involved others in his little escapade. His wife, I'm certain, would not have approved of this behavior had she known. And that means his business became our business, whether we wanted it to be or not. And that also affects his ability to represent the folks who entrusted him with that office in the first place.

Public office, like a BDSM session, requires trust. If that trust gets broken either way, people get hurt. And that's just downright unacceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't it more like someone peeped in his window
and filmed his "scene"? In my nek of the woods, we don't like the peepers much either. It aint no one's biddiness what happens under the covers until you make it our biddiness as Andy B. decided to do.

Can't wait to see when that asshole's day comes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. since Weiner now admits sending the pictures out,
It's not like a peeping tom saw him; it's more like he just went and flashed someone for all the world to see.

His career ain't going to survive this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Does the National Inquirer have a right to publish your e-mail photos because you
Edited on Mon Jun-06-11 07:48 PM by leveymg
"sent them out?"

It was sent to designated private recipients, not posted on his public page.

You are being a peeping tom, so long as you feed the meme that this hack was somehow legit and anything other than an invasion of privacy.

The last thing that Weiner should do is apologize (except to his wife).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillowTree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Ummmm.......yes, it was posted on his public Twitter page.
That's how it got out. Screen grabs before he hastily pulled it down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Umm . . . if that's true, he really likes living on the edge.
Edited on Mon Jun-06-11 08:05 PM by leveymg
Hard to believe, really.

It's going to take a generation for the rules of New Media to really sink in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. It wasn't email, it was Twitter.
Everybody could have potentially seen it, had the photos not been pulled down.
And if he did it from government computers,he will double his trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Brietbart should have been shut down a long time ago
He is a blight, and left unchecked, the blight is only going to spread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillowTree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Then it would have been someone else. That's 21st century politics and everyone knows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. More like he put it on a virtual billboard.
Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillowTree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. He was standing in front of that window in his drawers with a spotlight shining right at him.
Stop trying to pretend that he didn't bring this upon himself. Shit, even HE admits that he brought this on himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Exactly - I think this picture sums it up brilliantly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. You're making assumptions about his wife
Maybe she approved of this. Maybe she encourages this.

The point is, until someone makes a formal complaint, this is STILL a personal matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yes, it is an assumption - based upon previous experiences
Edited on Mon Jun-06-11 07:47 PM by derby378
Such experiences being Bill Clinton, Eliot Spitzer, Ohio AG Marc Dann, etc. Sorry, I can't help it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Strange how you pigeonhole all Dems
But it seems Weiner has bitten the big granite cookie, Washington-style.

One day, this kind of stuff won't matter. Until then, he's toast, it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. SIX random women he didn't know and couldn't really trust.
I agree 100%. And I think he's a fucking idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Stupid doesn't get censured in the US Congress. But, it should. Still, nobody's business
and the MSM shouldn't even pass this on - this is just serial Peeping Thomism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I am not saying he should be censured.
Edited on Mon Jun-06-11 07:54 PM by PeaceNikki
Or that he should step down or lose his seat. But it's the ONLY thing we're talking about. And we wouldn't be if he hadn't been such a fucking fool. His credibility is shot. He clearly has ZERO sense of judgement if he thought his actions would not get out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. We'll be talking about this for about 15 minutes, and then on to the next manufactured
scandal or controversy. Anything to keep people from talking about the really bad stuff that's been done with true malice by real sociopaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. So let's not hand them Weiners on a silver platter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. OK I missed the part abnout 6 random women!
Where have I been all day? Uh. Work? We don't peep at anyone's junk there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC