Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Republican Strategy to Smear Democrats as a Bunch of Druggies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 11:01 AM
Original message
The Republican Strategy to Smear Democrats as a Bunch of Druggies
First in Florida, now in Wisconsin and elsewhere, Republicans are trying to make drug testing a requirement for anyone receiving unemployment and other benefits. Why?

There's little evidence that such testing would accomplish anything. But there's only one group of People willing to fight against this further invasion of civil liberties - Democrats.

And you can bet than any and all Democrats who speak out against these invasions will be smeared as a drug addicts, drug dealers, drug whatevers by the right. And it'll scare Grandma.

OK, Scott owns the drug testing firm in Florida, so he's got that going for him too, but I can see no other reasons for pushing this legislation except pandering and smear tactics.



Am I missing something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Or they could take it one step further and say ALL who take federal money must be tested. That
includes all federal workers including congress critters, the pres, and vice prez, everyone who take one thin dime of taxpayer (ie federal) money, must be drug tested.I would also include any and all government contract & grant recipients.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Recipients of Farm Subsidies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yes, everyone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Almost all new employees must submit to a drug test. I'm just saying...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Midway Rebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Who pays for the pre-employment piss check?
Just asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Maybe Where You Work They Do, Not Around Here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Only Nixon could go to China..
And only Republicans can end the drug war..

But they won't, it's far too useful for hippie punching..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's a total win-win-win for the Republicans.
Even if they lose passage of the legislation, it will be - as you say - because of the Democrats, so the Dems will come out looking like they're "soft on crime" and "fiscally irresponsible" and "pro having the government financially support the drug usage of the unemployed". Even though unemployment isn't government money, they spin it that way.

And if the bill passes, then the Republicans win again by further marginalization and shitting on the poor and unemployed.

And the last win is the increased use of expensive drug testing supplies will line the coffers of the already rich (who probably use more drugs than any of the folks getting unemployment).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. What needs to be pointed out is the cost of testing all of those people
versus the return for that testing.

The idea is fiscally irresponsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Works! It works!
GOPers like to pretend they were not smoking dope and dropping out in the 60s and 70s...which is bullshit because they were in droves! Then they became greedy asshole yuppies and started destroying America from the inside. Now we have criminals in charge of making decisions about crime!!!

Fucking down is up and night is day...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. K and R
to get some coverage on this.

Just another step toward a fascist state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Midway Rebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. We MUST all think alike and behave alike.
The governmnet will facilitate it by looking into your wee-wee.

The future is bright.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. Although I don't neccessarily disagree with the premise..
Drug testing isn't going to save tax payers any money.. it's going to cost them more.

What happens when a drug test comes back positive? Is that recipient then put into jail? Rehab? How much do either of those cost vs. the amount of welfare money they were going to recieve?

Second, what happens to the kids of druggy welfare reciepents? Now they're even further up a shit-creek. Yes - technically the drugged up parent can deem another adult to recieve the money on behalf of the child.. but who is going to make that choice? The drugged up parent. And they're more likely to choose another adult who will give the money to THEM instead of making sure it goes to their kids.

Frankly - at this point, the kids of welfare recipients are the ones i'm most concerned about.. but that's not the Republicans target here. So screw 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. But those kids will make the best soldiers in the Republicans new constant warfare plan.
Send the parents to jail, put the kids in "foster camps" to train them to hate, be angry, fight (hmmm.... maybe 10% make it to age 18 in the constant fighting in the barracks...), survive on little, then turn them into the super warriors needed for the constant war economy for the fuedal lords, which is the only kind of government or economy that Republicans get a boner about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. We're a country of druggies - they just disapprove of the drug choice of progressives
May as well get it out in the open. It's still the case that the common tests are much more sensitive to marijuana than other drugs.

So no, you're not really missing anything.

It's a divisive issue among Democrats. Sure win for the Republicans there.
It's a direct attack on progressives. Sure win for the Republicans there.
It's another addition to the MIC. Sure win for the Republicans there.
It's another systematic violation of liberty to get used to. Sure win for the Republicans there.
It's another example of ignoring problem behavior and dividing people up into castes instead. Sure win for the Republicans there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC