NYTimes Whitewashes Stalking Behavior Of Far Right Porn Freaks Who Preyed On Young Women

If you were following the diaries on DKOS, the Far Right freaks STALKED young women who followed Weiner. To the point, several parents terminated their daughters' twitter accounts. Not because of Weiner, who they all say didn't do anything inappropriate, but because of the Far Right Freaks.

Here is how the NYTimes refers to these stalkers:


Ethics Case for Weiner? Maybe One of Psychiatry
The New York Times
June 8, 2011


In fact, conservative bloggers, led by an individual identified as @PatriotUSA76, were tracking his Twitter account so carefully that they sent warnings to women who were being followed online by Mr. Weiner to be wary of him.

this is Weiner's mess. He created it. he kept on with it despite knowing that people were on to his sleazy gambit and he lied about it. No amount of obfuscating or indignation changes that.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Whatever. You apparently didn't follow this part of the story or you did and prefer to ignore the facts.

Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Well, neither have his "stalkers."

Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

and now blocked from my tweet feed...

He has... shall we say... a reputation. We crossed swords over Wisconsin... he is not the only one either. There is a group of them that are off the top.

Talk about a freakish behavior. He's the one who tweeted the pic to Cordova and lied about it. He should've stopped when he got those copied warnings. Now, because of the media circus he's created, the NY-26 victory and the Dem pushback on Medicare is a dim memory to the public.

What a colossal FUBAR.

is beyond me.\

did patriotusa76 put a gun to weiner's neck and make him send the pic?

so stupid.

So either you didn't follow the story, or prefer to ignore the facts or are happy the NYTimes is twisting the story to make a bunch of porn freaks who stalk young girls into heros who warned them.

ETA- I think you didn't see all the information about these freaks. I should have added the links etc to the OP to make it more clear.

There are screen shots and quotes from the girls' parents. There is a website that tracks rightwing hatemongers and extremists and these guys were on that site.

Sorry...there's nothing there.

Having never had any online discussions on the topic of sex, nor any inappropriate actions with women in my life, I figure the situation is different for different people.


But I do know that when I defended due process for a person, and defended various constitutional rights, there were people that did that very thing as smear. They told people lies about me for smear purpose.

They went around telling lies about me to people, to isolate me becuase I was calling them on there extrajudicial, anarchy based, non justice approach to using smear not justice for political, or personal monetary gain.

I know I never did things like some others, but know lies were told about me to smear me. Or anyone can be smeared, so smear merchants are the problem, as are those that give them any credibility or quarter. And it is a smear also if it is used by targeted justice against someone.


Or to make it simpler, I was smeared and did not do what the smearers said I did, as they went around to various people passing on smears.

Why did they smear me? Because I was defending due process and justice for someone, that might, and might not have been guilty.


And if they want the battle, They are actually probably guilty, although I agree there should be trials, and I know I am not guilty. So bring it on, I can defend on any battle field just fine.





http://vimeo.com/1764428

Billy Idol - Eyes Without A Face
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OFpfTd0EIs




Brothers in Arms - Dire Straits
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5JkHBC5lDs

Bonnie Raitt - I Can't Make You Love Me
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nW9Cu6GYqxo

Bonnie Raitt - Nick Of Time
http://www.123video.nl/playvideos.asp?MovieID=407128

Dire Straits - Walk of Life
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CknuCTRAW_I



Constantine - Bring me to life (Evanescence)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dx8d3K_hngw


And for the context challenged. Heel is Heal. many errors in that film.

That seems to be the standard applied to Weiner's behavior. If they didn't, what exactly is your problem?

The whistle blowers are the perverts approach.

Not sure if anyone will buy that, but more power to you if you can sell it.

stop making shit up. It's silly.

people.

Upthread I apologized for not including that info in the OP.

That said, you are wrong. They didn't "warn" anyone.

Otherwise, you are losing this argument.

try again.

Granted they may not be great guys but I no one ever thought they were.

Everything else is "this person is friends with this other asshole, so..."

knows it.

Those things are private!

:rofl:

It's a bit of a long-shot approach branding the whistle blowers the perverts instead of Weiner, but good luck, maybe it'll work.

Stalking? Porn freaks? Preyed?

So far it looks like only one person has proven he stalked young women, sent them porn and had visions of preying on them. And he lied about it as long as he could.

where's the link?

screenshots? knock knock....

and I am open enough to change my opinion when info warrants, so I would love to see that info.

Sounds like they were performing a valuable public service.

Interesting

when it comes to the behavior of the stalkers.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/06/05/982318/-WeinerGate-Ends-When-Mike-Stack-et-al-Are-Investigated

Stack's online BFF is into incest porn? guilt by association? fuck me i can't believe i'm defending these assholes, but that dkos post could find a real nice home in the 9/11 forum ffs.

thats what this link is
dont picture the (D) after wieners name and see if you can admit he is a sexually sick stalker then

i'll do it for her. can someone point out where the PARENTS stated that their daughters were being stalked, cuz i can't find that part. hmmmmnn....

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/08/nyregion/punishment-or-therapy-for-a-fool-in-queens.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/08/nyregion/punishment-or-therapy-for-a-fool-in-queens.html

The NYT is a mouthpiece for the govt.

does that mean these guys get a free pass because Weiner cheated on his wife?