......................


LIE #2. Jim Norton Promised Me There Were No Cameras In the Studio

Despite the plain evidence that there was a camera recording him, Breitbart also claimed to Van Susteren that co-host Jim Norton specifically and affirmatively told him there were no cameras, an assurance that lowered Breitbart's guard and induced him to share the image: "I said make sure you don't show it to anyone, and Jim Norton said, 'There aren't any cameras here.' It's very troubling for an employee of Sirus XM to say, 'there are no cameras here,' and then you find out that there are cameras here and they're going against their word and taping it, it's deeply problematic."

According to the Breitbart standard, by which the failure of a video camera to capture an event is definitive evidence that the event did not happen and that anyone claiming the event did happen is a liar, Breitbart is lying. Watch the video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9itMNwHIWIc&feature=player_embedded Do you hear Norton telling him there are no cameras? That means Norton did not tell him there are no cameras. Nor did Breitbart say, "Don't show it to anyone." What he did say was, "If I were to title this, and I'm like a photo editor at the AP, I would call it two-balls-one-shaft.jpg," and "Oh, he's an excited chap," and "unless he has that hair disease where you don't have any hair," Weiner's been shaving his pubic hair.

.....................

As you can see, Breitbart's idea of treating Weiner's family decently is flashing around Weiner's cock to his drinking buddies for shits and giggles. If only I could somehow burn it publicly!

Of course, the right thing to do in this instance would have been to simply publish the photo immediately and not try to pose as some sort of dignified messenger. Because no one believes that you are, Andrew.


MORE LIES FROM THIS PIECE OF SHIT HERE:
http://gawker.com/5810425/the-three-lies-of-andrew-breitbart

and Breitbart is ecstatic having it on his phone...

they act like 10yr olds.

But as for Breitbart...you know what they say about the scorpion.

Maybe the Clinton's thought he had presidential potential.

Or Chip, or Ted. I forgot Uncle Paul.

decency in him? Larry Flynt, otoh, does. Once he exposed the hypocrisy of Breitbart's party, Livingston's wife called him and asked that the not reveal anything more about her husband. He said he felt for her and promised her he would not. And to this day, he has kept his promise.

Breitbart was hired by whoever is funding him BECAUSE he has no decency.


And Democrats just keep helping him earn his keep by throwing anyone he targets, overboard.

It's painful to watch how Democrats jump to his tune every single time.

IMO, we should be out with pitchforks and torches running garbage like Breitbart back to the holes they climbed from. But throw some sex into the equation and the noses go up and righteous indignation rules. Make that self-righteous indignation.
I'm not happy that Weiner stonewalled this thing, as it turns out, with the same faux-passion he exhibits in his personal life, but I digress. I posted a few days ago - before the big lie was uncovered (or is that the big whatever?) - that lots of people do this kind of thing. Lots of people - gasp - cheat on their spouses! Isn't that their problem? Is this really that stupid? It may not be my thing, but who am I to criticize?
Our problem, as if we didn't already know this, is that our government is full of people like us: flawed, emotional insecure, greedy, evil, stupid/smart, aggressive, and way too conciliatory people.
We can sniff and huff and puff that our elected reps can't be as stupid as we are, or we can keep looking for people who effectively eliminate at least one of the traits above - whichever one appeals to us most at the time; and hope they don't fuck up.
Bottom line is that we may end up losing one of the most passionate (genuine or not) voices for liberalism that we have, and we loss him to a worthless piece of garbage who contributes absolutely nothing to society.

Why AREN'T we out with pitchforks to go after this contemptible excuse for a human being? It's beyond belief that there are actually people on the left who have the pitchforks out for Weiner, but give this vile piece of human excrement a pass.

On his worse day, Weiner doesn't come close to doing the harm to others that Breitbart has done throughout his miserable life. But where is the outrage here against him? Or in the media?

They can all be proud. They joined him once again in his latest stunt to destroy some more lives. Now that they succeeded, I wonder if they feel it was wroth it?

Dana Bash, Anderson Cooper, Wolf blitzer, instead of telling Breitbart 'there's no story here, this is a personal matter' they salivated and sunk to his level over the prospect of ruining another life. I despised them before, and didn't think I could despise any more than that but they succeeded in proving to me that there was an even lower level for them to go.

The whole thing was disgusting to watch and if for no other reason than to defeat them, I hope he riese above this and goes on to become Mayor of NYC.

Not to mention, he should never go on camera anywhere because the camera hates him.

He might not be telling the truth, but I don't want to rush to judgement. He may have syphilis, but he is a decent man.