2 million fish found dead in MD

http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/01/06/maryland.fish.kill/index.html?hpt=T2

Here we go again! 40,000 Crabs in the UK. 100,000 fish in Arkansas. Pretty soon there won't be plenty of fish in the....nevermind.

oh, it's all OK.

It's not like they have any connection to anything else on earth. :silly:

http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&hl=en&oe=UTF8&msa=0&msid=201817256339889828327.0004991bca25af104a22b



To me, it seems like sort of omen. Mother Nature has had it.

population and use 25% of her resources....that might be it.

Just looking at that map....lots of clusters around the fault line of New Madrid. If that blows, well, at least Monsanto's HQ in St. Louis will be gone.

all those points in the US seem to follow the BP spill trail. Up the East Coast and Mississippi river.

I seem to remember a lot of scientists who were very concerned about the food chain during the BP spill and subsequent dispersants released. The microbials eat the oil/chemicals, little fish eat the microbials, big fish and other animals eat the little fish, we eat everything...

the dispersant may be worse than the oil.

the ability to change/control the weather, they may be testing other applications or new technology.

It sounds so :tinfoilhat: but we know for a fact that the technology is out there -- and worse.

I can't think of any other way so many animals would be found dead at one time -- :shrug:

We know that do we?


We know conspiracy theorists make those claims, I have yet to see proof.

to respond with a snarky tone when disagreeing with a post.

Would a "I don't think that there has been any proof of these claims, gateley, I disagree with your statement and you might want to research it.:" be so hard? A civil, friendly response? Sheesh.

Regardless, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Do you have any evidence to back up your claim? I'd be very interested in seeing some if you do.

wouldn't have mentioned it.

How it seems to you isn't a factor as it wasn't addressed to you.

If I had proof I'd post it, but I don't. I've only heard of the Russians and Chinese making claims, and have heard Nick Begich speak a lot about HAARP -- here's a quote from his book:

"Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device."

And I don't necessarily believe if we had proof we'd be privy to it. So many times "proof" is dismissed by mainstream science then eventually it's accepted.

But sorry, no, I don't have the proof you're asking for. Maybe someday, or maybe not. :shrug:

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

http://www.naiwmc.org/

Maybe it's because I went to school in Texas, but we learned about weather modification in first year Physics, Engineering, Chemistry and even Astronomy.

More background here:

http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2011/01/humans-have-been-modifying-weather-for.html

some talk of climate change. These fish were frozen to death, along with the crabs in the UK. Changing weather patterns? Hmmmm.

Underwater near freezing cold currents could be a reason.

so heating up small areas of the ionosphere can kill fish? Go figure!

Round up the usual suspects. Anytime anything weird happens HAARP is blamed.

everything is touching everything else, including my brain, thus anything I think of must b e true!! see!@!!

terminology/technology to use.

besides a scientific tool designed to bounce high frequency radio waves off the Ionosphere? Is it a generic excuse used to explain things that have no obvious cause?

associated with the gubmint.

later. I'm not saying it's HAARP, but I am saying I wouldn't be surprised to see some type of interconnectivity on the deaths. The Taos hum eventually went away after all of the noise about it - the sonic booms from underwater testing around Monterey Bay eventually went away. Other examples too - stuff that goes on, some factual, some not, but stuff goes on.

Didn't see those. Just thought it was par for the course. ( Animal kills and Michael Vick ).
Seriously though, if these do turn out to be grossly unusual kills, I would like to know WTF is causing it.

especially as it relates to the other similar events around the globe this week..

where the local fish are more sensitive to colder water. Haven't seen any fish deaths in New England so far.

"This fish die off and bird thing is common, I wish they would quit wasting headlines on it. Get over it."

I hear this shit from him on FB constantly, and not to mention at family functions (which I am now avoiding).

for no apparent reason ain't that common.

but apparently it is all some conspiracy theory to the righties even though several species of birds and fish are dead in large numbers throughout the world.

at night. They roost in trees until morning. AND, they don't fly during storms; they stay in the shelter of the trees.

And regardless that large die-offs of birds and fish may be "common", isn't anyone concerned or curious about why it's common?