Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Treasury Burns 90 Billion (Pension Fund $'s) in 8 Days, $270 Billion by August 2nd

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 03:57 AM
Original message
US Treasury Burns 90 Billion (Pension Fund $'s) in 8 Days, $270 Billion by August 2nd
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/us-treasury-burns-90-billion-8-days

More scary stuff from the US Treasury which has resumed living auction to auction, even as it has plundered over $80 billion in G and CSRD retirement fund money http://www.zerohedge.com/article/quantifying-treasurys-plunder-retirement-accounts-80-billion-between-g-and-csdr-funds-debt-c to provide cap under the debt ceiling, a number which will eventually rise to $270 billion by August 2nd at which time all bets are off unless the politicos in DC finally relent with their soap opera and allow the inevitable $2 trillion debt ceiling hike (which probably won't happen.

Instead Congress will start voting on incremental $200 billion debt ceiling hikes month to month in order to keep the public glued to their TV in a demonstration of just how fiscally prudent Congress is). In the meantime, here's the math: in the first 8 days of the month of June, the Treasury has seen its cash balance decline from $112.6 billion to $23.5 billion: a solid burn rate of $90 billion in just over a week. But lest readers think that this is due to paying down debt, it isn't: total US debt was flat (at the ceiling), while intragovernmental holdings declined by $20 billion to accomodate another $20 billion in marketable debt (see the plunder of retirement accounts discussed above). So how does one reconcile this data? Simple - in June the Treasury has collected $44 billion in withheld individual income taxes (and a whopping $400 million in corporate tax), while spending double that, or $89 billion. Fiscal prudence? Rhetorical.



June Cash:



June Debt:



snip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R.... I will have to read this a few times to understand the
enormity of what this means....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. U.S. ran a $222.5 Billion deficit in February alone, and that was pre Libya/Yemen empiric strikes
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704823004576192791330273986.html

Plus, interest rates are still basically zero for short term Treasury notes, wait till the bond market jacks these up to 4% or 6% (and potentially whole lot more), you are staring at over a $1 Trillion plus a year easy in debt service alone.

But hey, can't touch that $1.2 trillion+ a year defense/black ops/homeland security war machine!


http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/03/real-us-national-security-budget-1-trillion

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. Republicans are trying to kill us all.
Oddly, they don't believe any of this will affect them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. And they will never replace it
It is grand theft by Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oh but deficits are no problem. Nothing to see here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The defict would stop being an issue tommorrow if
we put a Republican in the White House.

Both the GOP and the media would stop talking about it in an instant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The rating agencies wouldn't though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. What were the ratings agencies saying about it when Bush
was driving up the deficit?

Nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well when you consistently spend more than you take in there comes a breaking point.
And let's not fool ourselves. Pulling the economy from the abyss was expensive and it hurt revenues significantly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Exactly! Why do you think they didn't mention it when Bush was spending money?
And started the second a Democrat came into office. They know the way of our economic problems, and they will not let any Democrats solve the problems they created.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC