Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are Republicans Intentionally Sabotaging Economy For Political Gain?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:34 PM
Original message
Are Republicans Intentionally Sabotaging Economy For Political Gain?
Source: Daily Ticker (Wall Street publication)

Basically, <according to the argument>, Republicans are doing everything they can to ensure that the economy remains a mess when it comes time for the 2012 election. The Republican hope here, Dan explains, is that Americans will vote with their wallets in 2012--and, in so doing, vote more Democrats out of office.

Now, there's no question that voters do vote with their wallets: The deteriorating economy in 2008 helped President Obama get elected. And there's nothing wrong with stumping for policies that you honestly believe will help the country over the long term, even if you think they will cause some short-term pain.

But there's a big difference between that and intentionally doing things that will sabotage the economy over the next 12 months just to influence the next election.

If this is actually what some Republicans are doing, Americans of both parties should be outraged. The first loyalty of any elected representative should be acting in the best interests of the country., and advocating policies that you know will hurt the country--or stonewalling ones that will help it--is a gross dereliction of professional and civic responsibility.



Read more: http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/republicans-intentionally-sabotaging-economy-political-gain-164843992.html;_ylt=AtVR9wua9FDJMDQes08CcO67YWsA;_ylu=X3oDMTFjbXQxOTQwBHBvcwMzBHNlYwNGUERhaWx5VGlja2VyQmxvZwRzbGsDYXJlcmVwdWJsaWNh



f'rinstance by refusing to restore Big Corporate Money tax rates to those
of the Clinton era and before when we were prosperous. Trickle down never
worked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do dems by signing off on austerity schemes?
Edited on Thu Jun-09-11 08:38 PM by xchrom
The answer is yes - for both parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
60. They haven't had any choice but to compromise. They never held
a filibuster proof majority. Lieberman wasn't a Democrat; he was an Independent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. dems leadership (if there is any) needs 2 attack + offer solutions worth voting for nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
75. Definitely need to attack their propaganda
Edited on Sat Jun-11-11 06:19 PM by ShockediSay
How many jobs did Bushy-Cheney tax cuts create?

ANS: they created our long term Great Depression for US
which spread globally.

Obama needs to grow a pair and fight cut, cuts, cuts, cuts
& put what's left our our wealth to work
at least as much as Clinton did.

Why are Dems saying it's going to take time, just wait.
Tax the Top Two Percent, put the money to work creating
jobs and an economy instead of bubbles!

WE ARE APOLOGIZING FOR THE SHIT THEY HANDED US!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #75
79. We can't fight cuts because we allowed Republicans to take the House!
That's why. And Bill Clinton didn't fight cuts. He went along with Republicans on welfare. On NAFTA, and on a host of deregulatory initiatives. He even admitted as much. But, Clinton's problems were not just handed to him by Republicans; many Democrats went along with the Republicans on a host of issues.

It has been the same with Obama, but much worse given the economy that he faces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #79
83. We lost the election because
two crypto-fascists on the Supreme Court, who under oath said
they would observe precedent, turned us one big step closer to
fascism when they turned Big Corporate Greed Money loose for
Right Wing Propaganda ads in the election. It was this money that
funded the Tea Potty and the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. This should be obvious to any Dem!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
78. Why isn't it obvious to most here on DU? We have all these threads condemning
Obama and very few pointing the finger at Republicans who are deliberately trying to destroy this country to get back into power.

Jim DeMint told us the truth right to our faces! And so did Mitch McConnell!

Why can't we Democrats open our eyes and see what's happening?!??!

*so frustrating!*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Doh!
I've been screaming this all along. WHY in the world would republicon politicians and small business owners want to hire anymore employees or support any jobs bills that might make this President look like more than a failure? Wonder why the banks aren't lending? Wonder why the big companies have the largest surplus of cash in history? Because they simply are NOT going to invest in this country so long as we have a Democrat, and one by the name of Barack Obama, in the White House.

Jesus....did you just figure this out? As long as this President has been in office, he has done NOTHING right. Even the clown, w, is trying to be credited with killing OBL. This is a nation of complete morons...and sore losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Anyone who has not been wondering about this has not been paying attention
They will do anything ANYTHING to bring down Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftFist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. EXACTLY!
I've been wondering the same thing for a while now. This is probably the most anti-American thing that could be done and I have a feeling the GOP made a secret deal with corps (who are holding historic record profits) to do this very thing. Probably some BS promises of lower taxes and healthcare repeals. It's disgusting and it shows how anti-American the GOP and corporations can be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Legislative treason.
I'd love to see this framing used by Democrats and progressives. it's simple and to the point. The agenda is to bring down this country from the inside. We don't need an outside Al Qaeda boogyman when we have a whole Party of kleptocrats willing to do the bidding of the top 3%. When the rubes that vote Republican finally wake up and connect the dots, these people are going to have to make a very quick exit out of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
51. Yes, very good point. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
47. They don't want to bring down Obama.
He's giving them everything they want AND providing a way for them to blame the Dem party for all the damage the pukes cause.

They're wrecking the economy in order to take all the money.

Think of it as economic fracking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #47
80. Your reasoning doesn't make sense. Surely Obama knows that if the economy falters,
he'll be blamed, no? Why would he deliberately sabotage his own chances at reelection? It makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
54. It's not really about Obama
It's about anyone who in any way impedes their imperialist designs, even in the smallest way. "They" want to destroy both the knowledge base and the working class itself, with all the money going to the top. They are willing to destroy our economy because they have enough to live well, screw everyone else, more power to them and only power to them. Rick Scott is the perfect epitome of the Repug politician - a complete liar and theif who gives a damn about no one other than himself and the other ultra rich power brokers.

Of course the fact that the person who doesn't give them EVERYTHING they want is black, certainly riles them even more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Of course they do.
Just have to let the sheep know not to buy any extras until the election is past. Also, the rich can just go overseas if they want to buy cars. Delay purchasing a house or redecorating. It's really simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. I know it's counter-intuitive, but the answer is getting more and better Democrats elected to Congre
The 2010 results rewarded the Party of No for their hard work in killing a recovery. Will a majority of voters double down on the dumb and give them the whole government in 2012? Stay tuned!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Of course they are. That was the 2010 strategy and it worked well for them
It has been the Republican plan since Obama took office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timbuk3 Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
66 dmhlt Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
66. Yep - You're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George Wythe Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. It would be funny (the circle) if it weren't so incredibly damaging to people...
Party first, people 2nd, or 3rd or...

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/are-democrats-talking-down-the-economy

George Bush and Dick Cheney did it in late 2000 when they started talking about how weak the economy was. The Democrats in the lame-duck Clinton administration squawked that the incoming leaders were talking down the economy, making things worse just by talking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. But voters DON'T gain anything when they vote for Republicans
I mean, what did they gain when they held the House, Senate, White House AND Supreme Court?

:crazy:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
81. ...and governorships, and state legislatures, and lower-court judgeships...
Democrats really need to wake the fuck up and start pointing the finger in the right direction or this country is DOOMED!

Republicans want us to blame the president. That was always the plan. Change wouldn't come quickly enough because they blocked EVERYTHING in the Congress. So, what happened? Impatient voters went to the polls and put Republicans back in power. Now we wonder why we can't get anything done. Why is it that the president can't be MORE progressive? DUH!! He can't because the House is now in the hands of the Rethugs!!!!!!!

WAKE UP, DEMOCRATS!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. A slight deviation from their usual route: sabotaging it for financial gain n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yes, yes, yes! Absolutely!
I've been saying that for a couple years now. ReThugs haven't passed one bill that would help the economy or stimulate jobs. Everything they vote for is detrimental to the economy. A bad economy is their only chance to win back the WH. Corp. are also in cahoots as they won't hire because it will mean more jobs...bad move! That's why the banks won't lend out small business loans. No loans...No jobs! The last thing Corp. want is have Obama continue in office. They will do everything they can to help Rethugs regain the WH and their doing it! Then if a Rethug wins the election... wallah...there will be a gazillion new jobs and the ReThugs will claim it's their corrupt policy that created all those jobs. That has been my greatest fear for a long
time. Why aren't the Dems and MSNBC pointing this out. They need to start calling Rethugs unpatriotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oNobodyo Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. They've always been this way...
As far back as I can remember the adage has been "republicans break it and democrats fix it" but now the republicans want it broken permanently and too large a number of dems are just like Walkers fake dems...fake dems.

To be a republican means self above community and party above country.

You need to understand that in their minds they aren't our servants...we're theirs.

Washington DC. has the highest average income per capita of any "country" with the rest of this country coming in at less than half that average...

Is it really a mystery that policy is being shaped for millionaires almost exclusively?

They really just don't care what happens to the rest of us so long as they gain total control.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. Yes, which is why Obama and other dems should never have played ball with them
The Repuk's are the most anti-patriotic group of jerks in the country. They are also the most hypocritical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. no, they're intentionally sabotaging the economy for financial gain.
they represent a narrow slice of the population -- the ultra-rich and their agents (themselves included).
they have taken the view that the economy is a zero-sum game and they want to take more than their fair share at the expense of the rest of us.

will a bad economy benefit them politically? only modestly, most likely, as most people continue to blame shrub for the mess and see obama on their side, more or less. at least most people these days think democrats are better than republicans when it comes to the economy.

in any event, it's a side benefit to them at best. if they thought they could profit from a better economy, they'd do it. but in their narrow little pea-brains, they think that jump-starting the economy will cost them and benefit poor people, and they just can't for the life of them figure out how giving poor people jobs translates to more profit for rich people.

it's as if their attention span is so short they fell asleep after the first word of "supply and demand".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
on point Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
19. Fact is Supply-side economics doesn't work. Hard to tell if they are delusional or repugnant!
They are certainly trying to kill off any real measures that might help, like a jobs bill or funding needed infrastructure building. But then they don't get economics. They are stuck believing that supply-side economics works, even though the empirical evidence is in and it doesn't.

So while they are absolutely trying to prevent Obama and the dems from doing what they know is right, it is hard to tell if the repukes are economic simpletons, or so ideologically partisan that they intentionally tanking te economy in order to prevent OBama re-election.

They may also just be stuck on still giving ever more to their corporate benefactors and the wealthy.

In either case, they are playing with fire. If they push the country too far over the edge, then history says the wealthy risk a new revolution where instead of a simple reasonable tax rate, they will have ALL their wealth taken from them and they will be lucky to only be removed from their gated communities.

I am inclined to believe they are delusional and ignorant, as all their other pronouncements seem to be disconnected from reality and this is no different. That doesn't make them any less dangerous to yhe country and the world though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #19
77. Supply side works like a charm
It is an increadibly effective tool for taking money from the middle/working class and handing it to the rich without any of them going to prison.

Part of its mechanism is to convince people that it has an entirely different purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. Must be the Bill Bennett Double Down strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roci Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
21. That
would be a "Yes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. As opposed to?
For the economic gain of their benefactors? :shrug:

For shits and giggles because they like watching the poor suffer? :shrug:

Because they can? :shrug:

I don't even think they are doing it intentionally, they can sabotage it without even trying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #23
44. unfortunately, it was way screwed before he took office
how soon do some people forget that it was Little Boots who basically announced before the election "ooh, we're screwed, y'all better do something before everything goes down." There were DUers who saw how initiating a bogus war in Iraq while shoveling our money to war profiteers while giving even more tax breaks to the rich and infamous was having a deleterious affect on our infrastructure and labor. I remember when Little Boots wanted to count burger flippers as manufacturing jobs. Unemployment was already going up and they attempted to "fudge" the figures.

What was needed after Obama got into office (and was not heeded) was what Krugman, Stiglitz and other economists suggested--they needed to pour money into public works (create jobs) and offer major incentives to businesses for hiring (and I don't mean slave wages). Instead, most of the rich and infamous took their tax breaks over seas or are sitting on it.

Maybe more people should have paid attention to Little Boot's businesses (how daddy's friends helped him), alleged insider trading and how deregulation screwed Texas. Also, the possibility that two of his choices (Dept of Labor and Housing) were going through a federal investigation before he was selected. Apparently, both investigations just disappeared. But no, all wanted to have a beer with him. Right?

My own belief, is that many repugs are sociopathic at heart-they wanted to "drown" any form of safety net, and that includes one for grandma. They want to corporatize every fekkin thing which brings about even more corruption, no accountability and will cost us even more. After all, a corporation is profit based. Repugs can wave the flag all they want-but most only believe in the golden rule of profit, power and greed.

You think Little Boots actually had concern about sending our soldiers to Iraq, into harms way or do you think he thought how KBR, Halliburton and the oily corporations could make more moolah?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lobodons Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
24. 6 months and no Job Bills
Hey Speaker Boner, where are the Job Bills!!??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
25. I've been thinking for a long time that this has been the MO of Republican businessmen & bankers n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yes, a cynical strategy.
What they've been doing in Washington and in multiple states is giving red meat to the base, and advantages to the top 1 percent, while trying to disenfranchise everyone below the top 1 percent.

Remember when Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said the top priority was making Obama a one-term president? Michele Bachmann reiterated that last Friday. Nothing in there about jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kashka-Kat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
27. No, come on it's a lot bigger than that - it's all classic "shock doctrine"
You've read the book - now see the movie! Coming soon to a theatre near you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. Exactly. Screw things up beyond recognition, so that the Republicans...
can come to our rescue with their "solutions".

As Exhibit A, I'd like to present this comprehensive list of job-creating legislation that has come out of the House since the GOP took over:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #35
45. actually, they started screwing everything up
for eight long years. Now they're worried about the deficit, now they say they have a solution. Unfortunately, their solution may shovel even more money into the hands of the "have mores", while screwing us-of course after we're completely decimated then we don't have to worry about the leeches feeding us BS anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
28. I wrote a thread here on the subject May 14th
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1104652

I was extremely disappointed that so few actually agreed with my premise. I wanted people to pick up the ball and run with it because I truly believe the Republicans are hindering economic recovery for political gain.

Today I heard a couple of thoughts on this subject starting to surface in the mainstream news. I think this is a very important topic which should be constantly brought to the forefront. Questions need to be asked, and Republicans need to be held accountable. Some things are more important than politics, and the well-being of the citizens of this Country should come first.

I hope this continues to be a subject of great (and frequent) conversation in the days ahead.

Sam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #28
38. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #28
62. sorry your thread got little response
I didn't see it back then - I agree, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Populist_Prole Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
29. Depends on just whose economy we mean.
1st off, great posts so far. All of them.

Anyway, of course their own fanatical support of supply-side economics makes sense to them in that it enriches their plutocratic base...useful idiot "values" voters notwithstanding.

Didn't Bush snidely remark in some gathering of supporters about how people say they're rich and out of touch...but Bush proudly called them "my base"?

It aint like they're bashful about it anymore. Gotta pillage what they can before they're put in check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
30. Do fish swim? Do birds fly?
Of course they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Second Stone Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
31. Republicans are bought by the already super rich
and want everyone else desperate to take low wages. They always try to screw everyone but the richest 2 percent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
32. Yes, yes & yes....its in the memo "defeat the black guy"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
An American in Paris Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
33. "Strategic deficit"
That's what Grover Norquist (Americans for Tax Reform) has long called it. Keep the country so far in the red that social programs HAVE to be slashed or everybody goes under.

Permanent untenable deficit & economic hardship also keeps the citizenry riled up against government.

Molly Ivins used to say something similar about how Shrub ran the economy in Texas: 1. Don't fund it. 2. It breaks. 3. Blame government. 4. Eliminate public regulation.

The GOP, it's where underachievers find their calling!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nossida Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
34. no
They are Intentionally Sabotaging the Economy
for 'Both' Political, and Financial Gain. Tax
Cuts and Breaks for Corporations are handouts
from The US Treasury, all made legal thanks to
republican policy. Of course Profits are up for
Big Business. When Raiding the US Treasury is
your only function, how could it be otherwise?

The Rich are paying the least Tax in History,
so it isn't their money being pilfered. The
Taxes of the Masses legally given to a Wealthy
Few. A working Man who Votes Republican, is
the same as a chicken Voting for Colonel Sanders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
36. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
37. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
39. We have to destroy the economy in order to save it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disillusioned73 Donating Member (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
40. Libs/progressives were yelling this from day one...
and what were they/we told?? STFU - we got this...

Unfortunately, the "I told you so's" that are justified won't fix the economy.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
41. of course they are.
what else matters? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
42. does keef richards do drugs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
43. I think they have been since before Bush left town.
It's the only chance they have of beating Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
46. Such is no more certain than the sun will rise in the east
Edited on Fri Jun-10-11 01:35 PM by indepat
tomorrow. :patriot:

Edited for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
48. If so, it is traitorous.
At such a fragile time, we can ill afford political gamesmanship. It's almost like people who try to sell water for five bucks a gallon after a hurricane has hit-- only it's much, much worse, because these guys are causing the hurricane in addition to trying to profit from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
49. Yes. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
50. Yes.
On the other hand, maybe not. Maybe this is the best they can do. The Teabaggers are dangerous idiots who do not understand the forces they are dealing with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
52. YES
OF COURSE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSpartan Donating Member (736 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
53. Is water wet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #53
71. Can GEICO save you 15% or more on car insurance? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
55. Republicans openly want Obama to fail
They have been saying so since the day he took office. Every move they have made has been to undermine the present administrations efforts to improve the economy. First they made sure the stimulus was heavy on tax breaks instead of being targeted to communities, they block efforts to extend unemployment, they have actively sought to slash medicaid and any social program that benefits the poor and most vulnerable, they are trying to un-do HCR by voucherizing medicare, challenging HCR in courts, and trying to defund it.

Republicans desperately want the economy to falter and fall further in the hopes they can: push to privatize as much as possible and roll back all remnants of the New Deal and hopefully score more seats as voters become so desperate, and so confused they vote for someone else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livingonearth Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. I agree!
They are getting very good at it, doing much of their undermining on the state level.

I still believe that health care could have been a real boost to the economy. My plan, if we had gotten a good single- payer health system, would have been to start my own business. That would have opened my current job to someone else looking for employment. As it is, I am forced to stay at my current job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
willhe Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
56. Ummm... of course they are
Republicans are worst than what AlQueda. Always has been. They are evil to the core. But the lame stream media dont show just how evil they are. Dems dont call them out on it. Just like the bs with medicare. They dont have to sign on to that crap but they will. The stupid freaking dems forgot their plans was in "Obamacare". One party is evil the other party are its minions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BulletproofLandshark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
57. Why wouldn't they?
They all know they're going to land on their feet no matter how bad things get here. The way they see it, we're all just collateral damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
58. If Social Security is an "Entitlement"....
..then we are ENTITLED to every penny back that we paid in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
61. I've been saying that for over 2 years now - when the economy sucks
the president gets most of the blame. Republicans know this, and they also know Americans and the American media won't pay attention to the inner workings of Washington and how Republicans are working to sabotage Obama. It's a coordinated plan between Republicans at the state level (Walker, Scott, Kasich, etc) and in Washington to tank the economy & not do anything to create jobs. I mean, why would any governor turn down hundreds of millions of dollars in federal rail money - it would create thousands of jobs that would likely last them through their re-election (3-4 years) - unless they wanted Obama to fail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
63. Isn't that their religion?
From a Limbaugh sermon:

If I wanted Obama to succeed, I'd be happy the Republicans have laid down. And I would be encouraging Republicans to lay down and support him. Look, what he's talking about is the absorption of as much of the private sector by the US government as possible, from the banking business, to the mortgage industry, the automobile business, to health care. I do not want the government in charge of all of these things. I don't want this to work. So I'm thinking of replying to the guy, "Okay, I'll send you a response, but I don't need 400 words, I need four: I hope he fails." (interruption) What are you laughing at? See, here's the point. Everybody thinks it's outrageous to say. Look, even my staff, "Oh, you can't do that." Why not? Why is it any different, what's new, what is unfair about my saying I hope liberalism fails? Liberalism is our problem. Liberalism is what's gotten us dangerously close to the precipice here. Why do I want more of it? I don't care what the Drive-By story is. I would be honored if the Drive-By Media headlined me all day long: "Limbaugh: I Hope Obama Fails." Somebody's gotta say it.


http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_011609/content/01125113.guest.html



My apologies for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
64. It comes rather "natural" to them, having such disdain for anything to do with guv-mint ~nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
65. That "Pope" guy... is he Catholic?
Does an ursine mammal defecate in dense timberland?

Is Sarah Palin cognitively challenged?

Will tomorrow morning's sunrise occur on an oriental horizon?

Tune in for the answers to these exciting mysteries!

sarcastically,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maineman Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
67. Republicans are willing to do that. I am quite sure. On the other hand,
Republicans are to stuck in their idiological bubble, that they can act in the most amazingly stupid ways. It is possible that they are just being stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
68. No - they are purposefully making government fail because they believe all government is bad
Even if it succeeds, it's BAD

BAD BAD BAD

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Slit Skirt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
69. I thought this was a no brainer....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulka38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
70. Inadequate stimulus and Hooveresque policies
are primarily to blame for our economic woes at this point, imo. Republicans are going to continue to obstruct and just be the supply siders that they are. No big surprise. Democrats should have been much bolder when they swept into power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCollar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
72. yes...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
73. Don't look at the man behind the curtain, instead LOOK AT REP. WEINER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-11 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
74. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-11 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
76. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
82. No - what you see is the expected result of DEMOCRATIC and Fed actions
The Fed's spate of easy money lacked a diffusion mechanism onto Main Street, so it drove up asset prices, and most especially commodity prices.

Congress and the President (both Democratic, btw) decided last December to do away with the MWP tax credit and substitute the FICA 2% employee side rollback. This did two things - it overtly raised taxes on the lowest income earners compared to 2010, and it gave an absolutely HUGE tax break to the high earners.

So a couple each earning 15K a year, net 30K, ended up paying $200 more in federal taxes, but a law professor and a doctor couple, each earning over 100K, got a $4,000 tax cut. Naturally, the professors and many government employees really favored this! Why any Democratic politician should have is another question....

Because of the inflationary effect of the Fed's actions, the real income of the 30K couple fell much more than just the cost of the tax increase, although why the hell we are increasing taxes on the lowest earners in an economy like this is beyond me!!!

However the inflationary cost of basics for the higher income couple were relatively minor, because they spend much less of their incomes on transportation, food and utilities, plus they got a 4K tax cut. So they went out and spent it. This made everything look hunky dory for a while, so delusional Fed bankers, delusional Congressmen, and yes, a delusional president could tour the country talking about the great recovery.

But now, when the slow erosion of lower income earners has started to bleed through the economy to the higher earners (doctors, lawyers, business owners), we are left standing like idiots wondering what happened, and trying to blame it on the Republicans.

Success requires taking responsibility for your actions. The Democratic party will not win the next election unless it realizes what it did wrong and why it hurt the economy. Anyone who cares about Democratic principles should be pointing out why what is happening was doomed to happen.

Giving tax breaks to business owners isn't going to help. The problem is the loss of jobs and incomes for the lower end earners, and until we get serious about the problem and stop beating people over the head the economy is going to continue to degenerate.

YOU CANNOT FIX AN ECONOMY AFTER A WHACK LIKE THIS BY POURING MONEY INTO THE TOP. IT WILL ALWAYS FAIL AND DO MORE HARM.

Yes, I AM shouting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC