Osborne is making a speech on Wednesday but it will be at the Mansion House in the City of London. The place will be filled with big wigs, but they will be the grandees of Britain's financial services sector. There is no equivalent of the Mansion House speech for manufacturing.
Does this matter? One school of thought says that it doesn't. Britain, so the argument goes, has a comparative advantage in financial services, so it makes sense to specialise in securities trading, insurance, foreign currency dealing and investment banking. The City is a centre of excellence that creates well-paid jobs in spin-off trades such as corporate law, accountancy and management consultancy. It also pays large amounts that would otherwise be unavailable to the exchequer. Banker bashing is a classic example of cutting off your nose to spite your face.
It has proved mightily difficult for successive governments to challenge this argument, yet unless Osborne is prepared to do so, it is hard to see the coalition achieving the longer-term economic goals it has set itself. Beyond the short-term priority of deficit reduction, these are to build up Britain's productive capacity, to move people off welfare and into work and to ensure that there is no repeat of the financial crisis of 2007-08.
These are all worthy aims. The problem is that the economy has been moving in precisely the opposite direction for at least two decades and perhaps longer. The decline in manufacturing has made the regions relatively poorer compared to London and the south-east. Employment growth has been weak and heavily reliant on publicly-funded jobs. Meanwhile, the City has grown bigger and immensely more powerful politically. A paper published last week by the Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change (Cresc) compares the City to a mediaeval Italian city-state – an economy within the economy.
/...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/jun/13/coalition-revive-regions-manufacturing-financial-services