Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Delaware Black Caucus rips Democratic party leaders over proposed boundaries

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 12:10 PM
Original message
Delaware Black Caucus rips Democratic party leaders over proposed boundaries
DOVER -- The Delaware Black Caucus is accusing Democratic legislative leaders of "racial gerrymandering" in the redistricting process and is threatening to appeal its case for more heavily minority districts to the U.S. Department of Justice.

The group of black elected leaders have called on lawmakers to reconfigure House and Senate districts with large racial minority populations in Bear, Dover, New Castle and Wilmington to make the populations more dominated by racial minorities.

"It is our view that the proposed redistricting plans violate the spirit and the intention of the federal Voting Rights Act. We cannot and will not accept the status quo," Delaware Black Caucus chairman Jea Street wrote in a letter to House Speaker Robert Gilligan and Senate President Pro Tem Anthony DeLuca.

The strife between black Democrats and their white party leaders has triggered suggestions that blacks consider leaving the state's ruling party.

Read more: http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20110615/NEWS02/106150363/Black-Caucus-rips-Democratic-party-leaders-over-proposed-boundaries
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LoveIsNow Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't know about Delaware,
but in Florida, whenever they make a majority-black district it makes the four seats around it safe for white, rich, stodgy Republicans who will vote opposite the one safe black representative, and if you want to talk about neutralizing the black vote, there you go. I don't think gerrymandered majority-minority districts are a real path to integration in the government for minorities. There has to be some middle ground between gerrymandering the black vote into oblivion by scattering it and by hyper-concentrating it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Here's the secret: the so-called "equality" groups don't care, just as long as they have "their"
Edited on Wed Jun-15-11 01:03 PM by FLAprogressive
representative. It's really the most self-defeating shit imaginable. They'd rather have 4 racist white Republicans and a black democrat than 3 non-racist white Democrats and 2 racist Republicans (or whatever).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. True.. Districting needs to be strictly by GEOGRAPHY
and let the chips fall where they may.

What really needs to happen is for us to have MORE reps, and to stop the insanity that we have now.. We do nothing but play musical chairs every 10 years, as if we have the same number of people we had in 1911, when the top number was set..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives
Each state, however, is entitled to at least one Representative.

The only constitutional rule relating to the size of the House says: "The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand."<4> Congress regularly increased the size of the House to account for population growth until it fixed the number of voting House members at 435 in 1911.<1> The number was temporarily increased to 437 in 1959 upon the admission of Alaska and Hawaii (seating one representative from each of those states without changing existing apportionment), and returned to 435 four years later, after the reapportionment consequent to the 1960 census.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Without black congressmen or women there will be no representation for black people.
Edited on Wed Jun-15-11 01:23 PM by ej510
Chicago and New York are prime examples of having large populations without black representation, and blacks tax payers aren't awarded any government contracts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Women are 51% of the population, and they are not fairly represented either
Our system is not really set up for "fairness", or we would have a parliament
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. True, but black male unemployment is higher than any other racial group by a wide margin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I agree wholeheartedly, but
as long as we have the limited system we have , things will always be unfair...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. As long as black men as perceived to be ,lazy, a threat, unintelligent, criminals it will be this
way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. We can all "thank" the media for that conundrum
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Of course and on TV when black men are always playing the role of the con or ex-con it keeps
the myth alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. If that damages Democrats, then it should absolutely not be done
There is a lot of selfishness among s'tome legislators when it comes to minority-majority districts. If they can't get elected in a district that isn't minority-majority, then that is their problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. At the end of the day black people are still at the bottom of the barrel all over the world.
We are the last one hired and the first one fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC