Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clarence Thomas Can Breathe a Sigh of Relief with Weiner Downfall

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 09:28 PM
Original message
Clarence Thomas Can Breathe a Sigh of Relief with Weiner Downfall
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Clarence-Thomas-Can-Breath-by-earl-ofari-hutchin-110616-550.html

Every Democrat from the White House down screamed loudly for New York Representative Anthony Weiner to resign, and he finally did. But it's not a Democrat that's breathing the biggest sigh of relief at Weiner's downfall. It's Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. There was much talk a year ago that Weiner would be the point man on the House Judiciary Committee if it decided to go after Thomas for his long trail of financial manipulations, abuse, and duplicity. Weiner gave some hope that he'd be the go to guy against Thomas because he had been hammering him publicly on his dealings and demanding that he recuse himself from any high court deliberations and ruling on the constitutionality of the health care reform law that conservative's loathe.

Weiner certainly had a lot of ammunition to make Thomas's misdoings a prima facie legal and political embarrassment for the GOP. This stemmed from Thomas's wife Ginni's mini-king ransom earnings she received from assorted right wing foundations and think tanks. The Heritage Foundation, was a prominent funder of Ginni as well as the ultraconservative Koch brothers, the Coors family and Richard Mellon Scaife, all of which have a major interest in any number of Supreme Court rulings.


Thomas did disclose her earnings. He did not disclose speaking fees and perks he got from a bevy of the same conservative groups that his wife worked for and had close political ties to. And then he refused to acknowledge her involvement with Liberty Central.
Then there was the strong hint that Thomas perjured himself in his testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee during his court confirmation hearings in 1991 and that he compounded that by lying under oath to Congress during the hearings.

(snip)

Now Thomas and the GOP doesn't have to worry about that. Thomas's potential tormentor is out of the House and Democrats seem pretty much content to put the Weiner and the Thomas matter behind them. Thomas can now safely breathe a big sigh of relief at that.

(end snip)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, because he was THAT CLOSE to being impeached.
:sarcasm:

You do realize it takes Republican votes, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. And republicans can't be shamed or manipulated by the Dems...
Just watch how this Boehner thing goes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Public opinion is rather important as well.
The bus runs both ways.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Did Anthony Weiner call for Clarence Thomas' impeachment?
Did he call for his indictment?

If not, then the worst you can say is "he said mean things".

A sign of relief, indeed...

If you haven't noticed, Republicans don't generally care if people say mean things about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Exactly. That's what this was all about
and the pickle faced moralists played right into their hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yep. They stalked Weiner for months
and they got lucky. The same will happen to the next person that challenges Beltway corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nothing was ever going to happen to Thomas. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Prob
Sure enough Obama has said more about Weiner's little mistakes than he has about the real crimes Thomas is accused of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. +100000. No shit. Weiner talked "mean" but never played hardball. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Agree -- Weiner did pervert Clarence Thomas a HUGE favor -- !!
Edited on Thu Jun-16-11 10:06 PM by defendandprotect
And evidently we all recognized the dangers in attacking the right wing's

"ace in the hole" vote that gave them W and other rightwing decision, but

that didn't occur to Weiner?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. that's for sure; K&R eta: doubt Thomas was *that* concerned, though; he's protected
Edited on Thu Jun-16-11 10:37 PM by amborin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
la la Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-11 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. clarence-
the pubic hair king ---remember all that?

and---not to divert here---but what's the deal with bill o'reilly being so upset about what weiner did---when he was basically guilty of the same type of thing--ala the falafel? i'm just waiting for alan colmes or juan williams ( yeah, i know- they're wimps) to bring that up--billo would shut them up in a nanosecond!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC