Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Former President Jimmy Carter: Call Off the Global Drug War

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:28 AM
Original message
Former President Jimmy Carter: Call Off the Global Drug War
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/17/opinion/17carter.html?_r=1&ref=opinion

IN an extraordinary new initiative announced earlier this month, the Global Commission on Drug Policy has made some courageous and profoundly important recommendations in a report on how to bring more effective control over the illicit drug trade. The commission includes the former presidents or prime ministers of five countries, a former secretary general of the United Nations, human rights leaders, and business and government leaders, including Richard Branson, George P. Shultz and Paul A. Volcker.

The report describes the total failure of the present global antidrug effort, and in particular America’s “war on drugs,” which was declared 40 years ago today. It notes that the global consumption of opiates has increased 34.5 percent, cocaine 27 percent and cannabis 8.5 percent from 1998 to 2008. Its primary recommendations are to substitute treatment for imprisonment for people who use drugs but do no harm to others, and to concentrate more coordinated international effort on combating violent criminal organizations rather than nonviolent, low-level offenders.

These recommendations are compatible with United States drug policy from three decades ago. In a message to Congress in 1977, I said the country should decriminalize the possession of less than an ounce of marijuana, with a full program of treatment for addicts. I also cautioned against filling our prisons with young people who were no threat to society, and summarized by saying: “Penalties against possession of a drug should not be more damaging to an individual than the use of the drug itself.”

These ideas were widely accepted at the time. But in the 1980s President Ronald Reagan and Congress began to shift from balanced drug policies, including the treatment and rehabilitation of addicts, toward futile efforts to control drug imports from foreign countries.


...Carter's message noted here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=439&topic_id=1249126
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Smart man
Always has been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed.
And I'm glad he has the courage to stand up and speak the truth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. another disaster from the Reagan administration
These recommendations are compatible with United States drug policy from three decades ago. In a message to Congress in 1977, I said the country should decriminalize the possession of less than an ounce of marijuana, with a full program of treatment for addicts. I also cautioned against filling our prisons with young people who were no threat to society, and summarized by saying: “Penalties against possession of a drug should not be more damaging to an individual than the use of the drug itself.”

These ideas were widely accepted at the time. But in the 1980s President Ronald Reagan and Congress began to shift from balanced drug policies, including the treatment and rehabilitation of addicts, toward futile efforts to control drug imports from foreign countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. It's useful to look back and read what the 1972 Commission had to say
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/library/studies/nc/ncmenu.htm

this is specifically about cannabis - but definitely worth reading - and note this final comment:

We have carefully analyzed the interrelationship between marihuana the drug, marihuana use as a behavior, and marihuana as a social problem. Recognizing the extensive degree of misinformation about marihuana as a drug, we have tried to demythologize it. Viewing the use of marihuana in its wider social context, we have tried to desymbolize it.

Considering the range of social concerns in contemporary America, marihuana does not, in our considered judgment, rank very high. We would deemphasize marihuana as a problem.

The existing social and legal policy is out of proportion to the individual and social harm engendered by the use of the drug.
To replace it, we have attempted to design a suitable social policy, which we believe is fair, cautious and attuned to the social realities of our time.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. our greatest living president
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harmony Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Absolutely
He seems to understand the bigger picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. He also left the Southern Baptist Convention
because of the sexist views of females.

He not only thinks about issues - he has the courage of his convictions to do things that indicate the importance of discrimination against entire groups of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunasun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. that is why he didnt get to stick around long @WH by some powers that be....too truthful!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sad sally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. President Carter, faced with the hostage crises, did not start a war
Edited on Sat Jun-18-11 04:26 PM by sad sally
in order to get re-elected, and in 1976 he campaigned for president on a platform that included decriminalizing marijuana and ending federal criminal penalties for possession of up to 1 ounce of the drug.

The best President in my lifetime. He understood what peace in the world meant, he knew we needed to take care of Planet Earth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Carter understands the importance of policies that work
and the importance of long term planning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuntcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. yah
for lotsa reasons too :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. i love jimmy carter
always have...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dokkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
31. so true
a second Carter term would have changed the course of this country in a positive way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. btw, h/t to DUer "Harry Anslinger" for the link
from a thread in editorials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry J Asslinger Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Thank you for posting it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. oops. kind of got your name wrong
it's such a scary name... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry J Asslinger Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. haha
Yes, it is :P

It's great to see the increased coverage on the WOD since the Global Commission on Drug Policy. It certainly sets the stage nicely for action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. this is also the 40th anniversary of the failed drug war
so it's getting lots of coverage at the moment for that reason - but the reality that people are getting more and more fed up with wasting time, money and lives on victimless crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. No, it's an awesome name!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry J Asslinger Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Thank you.
I must say that I also like your name. It meshes especially well with the Linux penguin for some reason!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. kicking to note Carter, a TN rep and a Drug Policy advisor all call for an end
to the real "reefer madness."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. "in the 1980s President Ronald Reagan"
declared war on anybody who was open-minded enough to experiment with drugs, i.e. liberals.

Like terrorism, you don't make "war" on drugs but on the people who are somehow involved with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. thank you Mr. President
Edited on Fri Jun-17-11 07:37 PM by spanone
you can bet the privatized prison lobby is rising up at the mere thought
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. during the run up to the election on Prop. 19 in CA in 2010
the beer industry kicked in funds to the opposition.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. Agree -- it's certainly one of the many RW programs ripping the nation apart ... insane!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
24. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QuintanarooBoy Donating Member (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
25. Easy K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogmoma56 Donating Member (329 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
26. drug war 2011 will cost $23.44 billion for 2011, 1.3 Trillion so far, prisons will cost $32 billion
a year, it is a drug war and prison complex, both force feeding each other our TAXES.

but i have always thought, since my hippie days, that weed would only be legalized when the Revolution actually happened and everyone went into the streets. then they would legalize weed and the revolution would immediately end. everyone would go home get stoned, and eat a bag of potato chips while watching the revolution on TV with the sound off.
:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. I think the revolution is happening at the state level
in states where people can put initiatives on ballots and in states that have enough rational people to vote for sane laws.

the special interests that benefit from prohibition are powerful, tho, and have more politicians in their pockets than not, seems to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogmoma56 Donating Member (329 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. yea, the ripoff hooks go pretty deep into $55 billion a year, and have made over a Trillion already.
i think the prison cost estimate is pretty low, i have heard that with all the support, probably courts and lawyers it is more like $65 billion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry J Asslinger Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Lot of money and jobs floating around there
Those special interests will fiercely fight any change in this matter right to the very end.

Nothing even seems remotely near changing at the federal level. It'll have to go the way of alcohol prohibition, it seems - jury nullification and states giving the finger to the federal drug laws. From the citizens right to up the upper echelons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. here is a list of states in which citizens can place initiatives on ballots
http://www.iandrinstitute.org/statewide_i%26r.htm

24 states:

Alaska | Arizona | Arkansas | California | Colorado | Florida | Idaho | Illinois | Maine | Mass. | Michigan | Mississippi | Missouri | Montana | Nebraska | Nevada | North Dakota | Ohio | Oklahoma | Oregon | South Dakota | Utah | Washington | Wyoming

The following states have decriminalized cannabis possession:

Alaska | California |Colorado | Maine | Massachusetts | Minnesota | Mississippi |Nebraska | Nevada | New York | North Carolina | Ohio | Oregon

The following states have active medical marijuana programs - and those programs are operated differently, based upon the state:

Alaska | Arizona | California | Colorado | Delaware | District of Columbia | Hawaii | Maine | Maryland | Michigan | Montana | Nevada | New Jersey | New Mexico | Oregon | Rhode Island | Vermont | Washington

If people in Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Utah, Washington and Wyoming wanted to put an initiative on the ballot for 2012 to decriminalize, seems like they could if they follow the link, above, and find out their state's processes for doing so.

that would be a great thing to see, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC