Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

75 Percent Of Nuke Sites Have Leaked Tritium

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 06:44 PM
Original message
75 Percent Of Nuke Sites Have Leaked Tritium
75 Percent Of Nuke Sites Have Leaked Tritium

GazetteNET.com
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Staff Writer
Friday, June 17, 2011



BRACEVILLE, Ill. - Radioactive http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium">tritium* has leaked from three-quarters of U.S. commercial nuclear power sites, often into groundwater from corroded, buried piping, an Associated Press investigation shows. The number and severity of the leaks has been escalating, even as federal regulators extend the licenses of more and more reactors across the nation.

Tritium, which is a radioactive form of hydrogen, has leaked from at least 48 of 65 sites, according to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission records reviewed as part of the AP's yearlong examination of safety issues at aging nuclear power plants. Leaks from at least 37 of those facilities contained concentrations exceeding the federal drinking water standard - sometimes at hundreds of times the limit.

While most leaks have been found within plant boundaries, some have migrated offsite. But none is known to have reached public water supplies.

At three sites - two in Illinois and one in Minnesota - leaks have contaminated drinking wells of nearby homes, the records show, but not at levels violating the drinking water standard. At a fourth site, in New Jersey, tritium has leaked into an aquifer and a discharge canal feeding picturesque Barnegat Bay off the Atlantic Ocean.

    * - Tritium is potentially dangerous if inhaled or ingested. It can combine with oxygen to form tritiated water molecules, and those can be absorbed through pores in the skin. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium#Decay">link

http://www.gazettenet.com/2011/06/17/75-percent-of-nuke-sites-have-leaked-tritium">MORE


- What is there to say that hasn't already been said??? - At some point we must realize that words alone will no longer suffice.....

DeSwiss




"A human being is part of the whole, called by us 'universe' a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his
thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest -- a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness." ~Albert Einstein







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. That Keynes quote nails. Un-effing-believeable. nt
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. ...and the other 25% are lying about their lack of tritium releases
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Vermont Yankee nuclear plant continues monitoring groundwater for tritium (125 times safe levels)
http://www.gazettenet.com/2011/06/21/vt-reactor-continues-tritium-cleanup

Tuesday, June 21, 2011



AP Photo The Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant on the banks of the Connecticut River in Vernon, Vt., is seen in April.


The Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant continues to monitor groundwater for tritium after the radioactive isotope was discovered in high amounts in a test well on its property near the Connecticut River last year.

The leak was followed by a series of other positive readings for tritium and other radioactive substances on the plant's grounds. The most recent tritium leak was reported in a test well in January and its source is not definitely known, though the plant took a discharge line out of service as a result.

"They haven't fully been able to demonstrate cause and effect," said Neil Sheehan, a spokesman for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

snip

The Vermont Senate was so troubled by tritium leaks - as high as 2.5 million picocuries per liter at the reactor, or 125 times the EPA drinking-water standard - that it voted to block relicensing. The Senate vote also followed admissions by the plant that it misled Vermont regulators and lawmakers about whether the plant had the kind of underground piping that carries radioactive material.

In March, the NRC granted the plant its 20-year license extension, despite state opposition. Weeks ago, Entergy sued Vermont in federal court, challenging its authority to force the plant to close. The plant's permit expires in March 2012.

Tritium is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen and a product of nuclear fission. It is a carcinogen when ingested, inhaled or absorbed in large amounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. This information about the "bathtub curve" should cheer you right up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. K & R
Amazing what we find when we start paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. I can think of far worse things leaking from a reactor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Greatest threat to us is Global Warming -- nukes not far behind -- !!!
In fact, because no one can say how all of this will compound --

i.e., floods/droughts -- storms, hurricanes -- cyclones, tornados --

and earthquakes --

all in increasing numbers and severity --


Common sense would tell us that we need to shut down all nuclear reactors --

those in US take 6 months to properly shut down --

Evidently those at Fukushima take 1 year to properly shut down -- provided they're

not already FU'd by an earthquake and a tsunami!!


And what about those oil rigs in the Gulf -- how many hundreds of them?

How insane are we to let capitalists get away with this BS?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC