Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

i think all political candidates need mental evaluations and brain scans to eliminate Psychopaths

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
dogmoma56 Donating Member (329 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 09:45 PM
Original message
i think all political candidates need mental evaluations and brain scans to eliminate Psychopaths
i have been reading Dr Hare's book, "Without Conscious".. describes a lot of the GOP.

Psychopaths are a single digit minority but commit the vast majority of serious crime. the laws are quickly changing to identify them and imprison them for life to keep them from breeding


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kurska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. "the laws are quickly changing to identify them and imprison them for life
to keep them from breeding"

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bingo.
Edited on Sun Jun-26-11 10:12 PM by RandomThoughts
Psychopaths are a single digit minority but commit the vast majority of serious crime. the laws are quickly changing to identify them and imprison them for life to keep them from breeding

And guess what, it is the psychopaths that believe and do that in many cases, not understanding justice. They litterally think by 'science' they will make the world better by people without conscious fucking becuase they are better. by there bias of what is better, not being able to see the vision of those 'poor' people that did not steal and kill to get money, that have only a little money and much compassion.

It is so messed up, but easy to understand, declare your 'attributes' as that which should define what all humanity should be, then keep anyone else that does not have that from 'having children' It is absurd.

The supernatural exists, therefore that concept is proven wrong.


The idea that life is about procreation, that all that 'is' is some better effect generations down the line, many years from now. Nobody matters today, only that better people are born for tomorrow, the very doctrine of the 1930s.

That people mean nothing, except for those that are 'better' having children, and those worse not having children. Even to the point of making it difficult to be secure in money and health, to lower the amount of people having children. And only the worst of people think they should decide that, and use many methods to try to control who should have families.


I know that idea, it is the defense that the 'worldly actions of isolation or theft, are done to stop procreation of bad people. And I know some of you think that about me, but you know so little.



The entirety of the universe your soul, your being, and all reason for existence, reduced to one thing.

Fucking people.



Those people have a knife in their head.


And for some of the really messed up 'heredity' people out there.
I am due beer and travel money, not so I can fuck, although I probably will continue to do that in life. But if that was the reason, guess what, I would be out there fucking people right now, not trying to explain how messed up that doctrine is. Ah but posting here, is to keep me from 'fucking, that is why they would say I post' They say the 'talking to the troll till turned to stone' is what happens to people being 'cut off'

Really you should here what they think.

But circular logic says, if I am not having children every year, then that is becuase I am not suppose to. The condition defining the reason for the condition. Because that is really easy to do.


The pinnacle of there society. Although that might be a made up news story about some other women that does much fine work. And an attempt to smear her.



But I know some think it is all about fucking, and I try to explain things from many different perspectives, so even those with knives in there head can agree within an idea.


Some don't see the great story of someone that made it past life in this movie. They only see something else.

Annie Lennox Don't let it bring you down
http://www.trilulilu.ro/Deathangel81/a2d2daf02f1633
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And one more thing.
Edited on Sun Jun-26-11 10:29 PM by RandomThoughts
How do I know so many great things said by so many people that did not have children, or are not directly in any hereditary linkage with me.

How could that be, how could their thoughts, maybe even their very spirit live on, even when all of history told a different story.

Why didn't you know this is a statue

Honoring Medusa.

Constantine - Bring me to life (Evanescence)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dx8d3K_hngw







Brothers in Arms - Dire Straits
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5JkHBC5lDs

Bonnie Raitt - I Can't Make You Love Me
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nW9Cu6GYqxo

Bonnie Raitt - Nick Of Time
http://www.123video.nl/playvideos.asp?MovieID=407128

Dire Straits - Walk of Life
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZxVC0GB838



yea I know your argument, you say that the mortal and immortal do not every cross over to each others existence, that is the only argument there is for it all being about 'fucking'. If there is any actual movement of spirit to the immortal, or from the immortal to mortal, then your entire case is wrong. Why also they don't like some of the older text stories, and why they try to scorch the sky.



Will I be there? I don't have to promise, nor need promises.

TheRE.
Robert Eastwood
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. The only candidate in the last 40 years that we know about was Eagleton.
He's the only one that was evaluated, treated and released.

none of the rest we are sure about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Absolutely not.
Resist *every* effort to involve psychiatry in government. It is far too subjective and far too easily used as an authoritarian tool. We are seeing now that the creep of fascism in this country comes when the government says, "I will protect and take care of you." The Soviet Union mastered the use of psychiatry and mental institutions to control people and silence voices they did not like.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC